Skip to main content

Assessment of the National Curriculum in England

  • Chapter
International Handbook of Educational Evaluation

Part of the book series: Kluwer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 9))

Abstract

Outlining the key features of the national assessment system in England might seem a fairly straightforward task, but the story is a complicated one, and the parameters of the system are constantly changing. The system has its origins in a highly devolved and entirely voluntaristic system of school examinations; has been driven by differing political priorities over a period of 15 to 20 years; and is still evolving as differing priorities interact with implementation difficulties. Moreover, although national assessment was conceived of in the context of a United Kingdom-wide government for implementation across the UK, and at various points in this chapter I shall refer to the UK as if it were a single administrative unit, implementation has differed across England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. Scotland and Northern Ireland have always had separate systems of education from England and Wales and, recently, constitutional devolution has placed even more decision making power with the regional parliament in Scotland and regional assemblies in Wales and Northern Ireland. Thus, although the broad thrust of policy is similar across the UK, implementation has differed across the four countries, and hence the detail of the chapter refers only to England. These variations derive at least in part from variation in the strength of the ideological debate underlying national assessment and, although the development of policy has been broadly similar across the UK, it has been implemented in the regions with rather less visceral hatred of the teaching profession than has been manifested by central government in London. Indeed, one of the main tasks in a review such as this is to try to identify what principles of national assessment might be appropriately discussed as policy options elsewhere, shorn of the particular ideological battles which pervaded invention and implementation in England.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 749.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Becher, T., Eraut, M., & Knight, J. (1981). Policies for educational accountability. London, Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5, 7–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (1988). Issues in formulating and organising attainment targets in relation to their assessment. In H. Torrance (Ed), National assessment and testing: A research response, (pp. 15–25). London: British Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, S. (1995). Educational objectives and national assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croll, P. (Ed.). (1996). Teachers, pupils and primary schooling: Continuity and change. London, Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullingford, C. (Ed.). (1999). An inspector calls. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daugherty, R. (1995). National curriculum assessment: A review of policy 1987-1994. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing, R. (1993). The national curriculum and its assessment: Final report. London: School Curriculum and Assessment Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • DES (Department of Education and Science). (1977). Education in schools. A consultative document. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, (cmnd: 6869)

    Google Scholar 

  • DES (Department of Education and Science). (1987). The national curriculum 5-16. A consultation document. London: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • DES (Department of Education and Science). (1990). English in the national curriculum (No. 2). London: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFE (Department for Education). (1992). Testing 7-year olds in 1992: Results of the national curriculum assessments in England. London: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFEE (Department for Education and Employment). (1996). Statistics of education: Public examinations: GCSE and GCE in England 1995. London: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFEE (Department for Education and Employment). (1999). The national curriculum for England. London: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFEE (Department for Education and Employment). (2001). Statistics of education: National curriculum assessments of 7, 11 and 14-year olds in England, 2000. London: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFES (Department for Education and Skills). (2001). Statistics of education: Public examinations GCSE/GNVQ and GCE/AGNVQ in England 2000. London: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J., Bridges, D., Ebbutt, D., Gibson, R., & Nias, J. (1981). School accountability. London: Grant McIntyre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirtz S., Ball J., & Bowe, R. (1995). Markets, choice and equity in education. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gipps C., Brown, M., McCallum, B., & McAlister, S. (1995). Intuition or evidence? Teacher and national assessment of seven-year olds. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. (1984). Improving secondary schools. London: Inner London Education Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillgate Group. (1987). The reform of British education. London: Claridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons. (1999). Education and Employment Select Committee Fourth Report. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Retrieved from www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cml99899/cmselect/cmeduemp/62/6202.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khattri N., Reeve, A., & Kane, M. (1998). Principles and practices of performance assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon M., & Stobbart G. (1988). GCSE examined. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, R.L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29(2), 4–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, B. (1979). Hard times — Accountability in England. Educational Analysis, 1(1), 23–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, J. (1991). Standards in schools: Assessment, accountability and the purpose of education. London: Social Market Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNess, E., Triggs, P., Broadfoot, P., Osborn, M., & Pollard, A. (2001). The changing nature of assessment in English primary classrooms. Education 3-13, 29(3), 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R. (1986). The emperor has no clothes: Grade criteria and the GCSE. In C. Gipps (Ed.), The GCSE: An uncommon examination. London: Institute of Education Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R., & Torrance, H. (1988). The changing face of educational assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, L., & Nuttall, D. (1983). Determining standards in the proposed single system of examining at 16+. London, The Schools Council, Comparability in Examinations: Occasional Paper 2, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, M., McNess, E., Broadfoot, P., Pollard, A., & Triggs, P. (2000). What teachers do: Changing policy and practice in primary education. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, A., Broadfoot, P., Croll, P., Osborn, M., & Abbott, A. (1994). Changing English primary schools. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • QCA (Qualifications and Curriculum Authority). (2001). Annual report. Retrieved December 2001 from: www.qca.org.uk/annual_report/resourcing.asp.

  • Reich, R. (1991). The work of nations. London: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L. (1990). Inflated test score gains: Is the problem old norms or teaching to the test? Educational Measurement: Issues and practice, 9(3), 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TGAT (Task Group on Assessment and Testing). (1987). National curriculum: Task Group on Assessment and Testing: A report. London: DES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, H. (1981). The origins and development of mental testing in England and the United States. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 2, 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, H. (1993). Combining measurement driven instruction with authentic assessment: The case of national assessment in England and Wales. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, H. (Ed.) (1995). Evaluating authentic assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D. (2001). Reliability, validity and all that jazz. Education 3-13, 29(3), 17–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Torrance, H. (2003). Assessment of the National Curriculum in England. In: Kellaghan, T., Stufflebeam, D.L. (eds) International Handbook of Educational Evaluation. Kluwer International Handbooks of Education, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_51

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0849-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0309-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics