Skip to main content

Mobility and Sustainability

  • Chapter
Sustainability Science

Abstract

Urban practices such as automobile dependence result from webs of institutions, from citizens and neighborhoods to city and state governments to federal policies. Effective action for achieving sustainability begins with understanding these institutions and how they respond to and resist change. In this chapter, we review those institutions involved with creating and preserving automobile use. This investigation illustrates that it is not enough to have a “right answer” be it a certain technology or a certain urban design proposal. The importance is in how these answers are implemented by citizens and governments – how visions are translated into interventions by real communities in various experiments and pilot projects which can help to illustrate pieces of those future states – today. In this chapter we review several cases of such proactive planning and policy which have been successful in enacting long-term visions for sustainable transportation. These include new urban planning paradigms based on transit-oriented design and accessibility, systems to facilitate sharing cars and to encourage cycling, and innovations in technology to improve the management of existing infrastructure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The sources highlighted with an asterisk (*) are recommended as further readings.

References

The sources highlighted with an asterisk (*) are recommended as further readings.

  • Black WR (2005) Sustainable transport: definitions and responses. In: Transportation Research Board (ed) Integrating sustainability into the transportation planning process. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp 35–43

    Google Scholar 

  • *Black WR, Nijkamp P (eds) (2002) Social change and sustainable transport. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • *Bullard R, Johnson G, Torres A (eds) (2004) Highway robbery: transportation racism and new routes to equity. South End Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero R (1996) Paradigm shift: from automobility to accessibility planning. Working paper. IURD, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero R (1998) The transit metropolis: a global inquiry. Island press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero R, Golub A, Nee B (2007) City Carshare: longer-term travel demand and car ownership impacts. Trans Res Record J Trans Res Board 1992:70–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis S, Diegel S, Boundy R (2010) Transportation energy data book, 29th edn, ORNL-6985. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge. http://info.ornl.gov/sites/publications/files/pub24318.pdf

  • Delucchi M, McCubbin D (2010) External costs of transport in the U.S. In: de Palma A, Lindsey R, Quinet E, Vickerman R (eds) Handbook of transport economics. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2010) Our nation’s air – status and trends through 2008. http://www.epa.gov/airtrends/2010/index.html

  • EPA (2011) Draft U.S. Greenhouse Gas Inventory report. http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/usinventoryreport.html

  • Etkin D (2001) Analysis of oil spill trends in the United States and Worldwide. Presentation to 2001 International Oil Spills Conference. http://www.environmental-research.com/publications/pdf/spill_statistics/paper4.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • *Featherstone M, Thrift N, Urry J (eds) (2005) Automobilities. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth A, Krizek K (2010) Promoting walking and bicycling: assessing the evidence to assist planners. Built Environ 36:4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster M (1981) From streetcar to superhighway. Temple University Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank LD, Sallis JF, Conway TL, Chapman JE, Saelens BE, Bachman W (2006) Many pathways from land use to health: associations between neighborhood walkability and active transportation, body mass index, and air quality. J Am Plann Assoc 72(1):75–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frumkin H (2002) Urban sprawl and public health. Public Health Rep 117(3):201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Geels F, Kemp R, Dudley G, Lyons G (2012) Automobility in transition? A socio-technical analysis of sustainable transport. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Golub A (2012) Sustainable transportation (Chap 7). In: Pijawka D, Gromulat M (eds) Understanding sustainable cities: concepts, cases, and solutions. Kendall-Hunt, Dubuque

    Google Scholar 

  • Golub A, Henderson J (2011) The greening of mobility in San Francisco (Chap 6). In: Slavin M (ed) Sustainability in America’s cities: creating the green metropolis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Golub A, Marcantonio R, Sanchez T (2013) Race, space and struggles for mobility: transportation impacts on African-Americans in Oakland and the East Bay. Urban Geogr 34(5):699–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2003) Bus rapid transit offers communities a flexible mass transit option. United States General Accounting Office, GAO-03-729T, 24 June 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • *Hanson S, Giuliano G (eds) (2004) The geography of urban transportation. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson JM (2013) Street fight: the politics of mobility in San Francisco. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP) (2013a) Sustainable Transport Award – 2013: Mexico City, Mexico. http://www.itdp.org/get-involved/sustainable-transport-award/previous-award-recipients/user-nominee-submission32

  • Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP) (2013b) Sustainable Transport Award – 2005: Bogotá, Colombia. http://www.itdp.org/get-involved/sustainable-transport-award/previous-award-recipients/bogota-colombia

  • Intelligent Transportation Society of America (ITSA) (2013) ITS America Government Affairs Brochure. http://www.itsa.wikispaces.net/file/view/ITSA+Govt+Affairs+Brochure_1.5.pdf/419564912/ITSA%20Govt%20Affairs%20Brochure_1.5.pdf

  • Keegan O, O’Mahony M (2003) Modifying pedestrian behaviour. Trans Res Part A Policy Pract 37(10):889–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine J (2005) Zoned out: regulation, markets, and choices in transportation and metropolitan land use. Resources for the Future Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine J, Inam A (2004) The market for transportation-land use integration: do developers want smarter growth than regulations allow? Transportation 31:409–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas K (2012) Transport and social exclusion: where are we now? Trans Policy 20:105–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machler L, Golub A, Wiek A (2012) Using a “sustainable solution space” approach to develop a vision of sustainable accessibility in a low-income community in Phoenix, Arizona. Int J Sustain Trans 6(5):298–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin E, Shaheen S, Lidicker J (2010) Carsharing’s impact on household vehicle holdings: results from a North American shared-use vehicle survey. Trans Res Record J Trans Res Board 2143:150–158

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlinden S, Hill K, Swiecki B (2003) Economic contribution of the automotive industry to the U.S. economy – an update. Center for Automotive Research. http://www.cargroup.org/?module=Publications&event=View&pubID=57

  • Millard‐Ball A, Schipper L (2011) Are we reaching peak travel? Trends in passenger transport in eight industrialized countries. Trans Rev 31(3):357–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson A (2009) The new urbanity: the rise of a New America. ANNALS, AAPSS 626:192–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry IW, Walls M, Harrington W (2007) Automobile externalities and policies. J Econ Lit 45:373–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Paterson M (2007) Automobile politics - ecology and cultural political economy. Cambridge Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) (2009) 2008 San Francisco State of cycling report. San Francisco Bicycle Program, Department of Parking and Traffic, Municipal Transportation Agency, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen S, Cohen A, Chung M (2009) Carsharing in North America: a ten-year retrospective. Trans Res Record J Trans Res Board 2110:35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor BD, Ong P (1995) Spatial mismatch or automobile mismatch? An examination of race, residence and commuting in US metropolitan areas. Urban Stud 32:1453–1473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2009) Access to affordable and nutritious food measuring and understanding food deserts and their consequences – report to congress. http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/242654/ap036_reportsummary_1_.pdf

  • United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) (2010) The national bicycling and walking study: 15-year status report. USDOT, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban Land Institute (ULI) (2010) Growing cooler: the evidence on urban development and climate change (Executive summary). http://www.smartgrowth.umd.edu/pdf/GrowingCooler-Ch1Overview.pdf

  • Wachs M (1995) The political context of transportation policy. In: Hanson S (ed) The geography of urban transportation, 2nd edn. Guilford Press, New York, pp 269–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiek A, Iwaniec D (2014) Quality criteria for visions and visioning in sustainability science. Sustain Sci 9(4):497–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiek A, Ness B, Brand FS, Schweizer-Ries P, Farioli F (2012) From complex systems analysis to transformational change: a comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects. Sustain Sci 7(Suppl 1):5–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron Golub .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Golub, A. (2016). Mobility and Sustainability. In: Heinrichs, H., Martens, P., Michelsen, G., Wiek, A. (eds) Sustainability Science. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7242-6_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics