Skip to main content

Rural Development in China: Review and Reflections

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
China’s Rural Development Road

Abstract

Progress and accomplishments have been made in rural development reforms in China over the past three decades and a red line is running throughout the whole process: protecting the material rights of rural population, respecting the democratic rights of rural population, liberating and developing the productivity of agriculture and rural areas. In this chapter, we look back on rural development in China and the course of reforms in the two areas of economics and politics, summarize experience which may provide lessons, explain the current state of rural development and reforms, and lay out the prospects for future development trends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The word nongmin carries several meanings. It is composed of two characters, nong, which means both “rural” and “agricultural,” and min, which means “people.” Previously the term was almost translated as “peasant” in English, as China was formally a feudal society, in which nongmin means peasants as we conceive of the term in the Western sense. The term “peasant” is also applicable in the early history of the PRC, with political classes such as “poor peasants” and events such as “peasant’s movements.” The term now has a distinctly different institutional connotation to it, as under the current household registration system, all citizens are assigned either an “agricultural” or a “non-agricultural” registration. Those with “agricultural” registrations are allotted rural plots of land for farming and homesteading, belong to the rural social system, and were previously subject to very strict controls on movement and employment, which are being gradually relaxed. Those with “non-agricultural” household registrations live in cities and are subject to urban social systems. People with “agricultural” registrations are still referred to as nongmin, even in this book, although such people are no longer necessarily farmers, but may be entrepreneurs or work in cities as nongmingong, or “rural migrant workers.” As such, the English term “peasant” is no longer appropriate for the modern connotation of nongmin, and so in this book I translate the term almost exclusively as “rural population,” except when discussing historical periods when the term “peasant” is more appropriate—translator’s note.

  2. 2.

    The “three rural issues” or “san nong” in Chinese are issues of agriculture (nongye), rural areas (nongcun), and rural population (nongmin)—translator’s note.

  3. 3.

    Sometimes translated as “moderately prosperous society” or “well-off society,” this term, originally a Confucian ideal, refers to a society with a large, functioning middle class—translator’s note.

  4. 4.

    The traditional unit of land area in China, one mu is approximately equal to 0.06667 ha, so 6.69 billion mu ≈ 446 million hectares—translator’s note.

  5. 5.

    “New Rural Construction” is short for the undertaking of “Construction of a New Socialist Countryside”—translator’s note.

  6. 6.

    It refers to the four municipalities directly under the central government rather than under the jurisdiction of a province: Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin, and Chongqing—translator’s note.

  7. 7.

    The term refers to the houses built by rural population on collective land that are tacitly permitted, but have no legal standing at all—translator’s note.

  8. 8.

    Please see chapter “Reforms and Development of the Rural Financial System”.

  9. 9.

    Chen, Xiyuan. “Three Focuses Must Be Grasped to Implement the Spirit of No. 1 Central government document,” http://www.farmer.com.cn/wszb06/nzh/ge/201602/t20160227_1184161_1.htm. 27 February 2016.

  10. 10.

    Ibid.

  11. 11.

    Townships, towns, and ethnic townships are all of equal status—tier four—in China’s five-tier hierarchy of administrative divisions below the central level, which goes: (1) province, (2) prefecture, (3) county, (4) town/township, and (5) village. Townships are generally located in more rural, less populated areas, while towns are in more urban, populous areas. Ethnic townships are located in areas of mostly ethnic minority population—translator’s note.

  12. 12.

    Zhao, Shukai. (2008). “Study of the Historical Process of Reforms to Towns and counties.” Review of Economic Research, 32, 44–47.

  13. 13.

    Tong, Zhihui. (2008). “Thirty Years of Self-Governance by Villagers.” Review of Economic Research, 32, 54–56.

  14. 14.

    To charge additional fees which should not be paid by taking advantage of the government’s power—translator’s note.

  15. 15.

    Here “lines” refer to commands from a high-level authority that proceed directly downward to subordinate bureaus of the same department, for example orders from the Ministry of Public Security in Beijing that are issued to all public security bureaus in the country. “Blocks” are commands from a local authority that affect all authorities of all stripes in a given region, such as orders from a provincial governor or a county or town chief—translator’s note.

  16. 16.

    Xu, Chenggang. (2008). China’s Economic Growth and Regional Decentralization. In Masahiko Aoki & Jinglian Wu (Eds.), From Authoritarian Developmentalism to Democratic Developmentalism (pp. 185–203). Beijing: China CITIC Press.

  17. 17.

    Liu, Wenhai. (2008). “The Fiscal ‘Center of Gravity’ should be Appropriately Sent Downward, and the Government Should Spend Fiscal Budgets Well.” http://politics.people.com.cn/GB/30178/8116529.html. 24 September 2008.

  18. 18.

    Sheng, Hong. (1994). Transitional Economics in China. Shanghai: Shanghai Joint Publishing Company & Shanghai People’s Publishing House.

  19. 19.

    This phrase commonly refers to less investment, high profits, low risk and quick return usually in technological development. It is also used to describe the action to spike volleyball—translator’s note.

  20. 20.

    Marx, Karl, & Engels, Friedrich. (1848). The Communist Manifesto.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoshan Zhang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. and Social Sciences Academic Press

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zhang, X., Li, Z. (2018). Rural Development in China: Review and Reflections. In: China’s Rural Development Road. Research Series on the Chinese Dream and China’s Development Path. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5646-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics