Abstract
The number and diversity of criminology undergraduates is growing, increasing the need to scaffold students’ transition into the discipline, especially in the first year. Although embedding academic skills in the curriculum is now a routine in many disciplines, it is relatively new in criminology. This chapter provides insights from a project to embed academic skills in the two first-year criminology subjects at a large metropolitan university. We present preliminary findings based on statistical and thematic analysis of student surveys and thematic analysis of qualitative interviews with the teaching team. These preliminary findings illuminate the disparities in the perceptions, expectations and experiences of academics and students around the importance of student engagement with academic skills, for academic success and belonging in the discipline. Academics’ perceptions and expectations about academic engagement, preparation and attendance were sometimes also misaligned with the dispositions and behaviours that students appeared to demonstrate. However, over time some students showed skill development and growing awareness of the importance of academic skills for successful study. We offer some insights into inclusive learning and teaching, prompted by questions about the expectations and responsibilities that constitute successful learning and disciplinary belonging. Our aim is to share practices that can make learning and teaching academic skills ‘worthwhile for both student and teacher’, to quote an academic participant in the study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bartels, L., McGovern, A., & Richards, K. (2015). Degrees of difference? A preliminary study of criminology degrees at Australian universities. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 48(1), 119–146. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.rmit.edu.au/10.1177/0004865814523437.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. What the student does. Berkshire and New York: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Bovill, C., Morss, K., & Bulley, C. J. (2009). Should students participate in curriculum design? Discussion arising from a first year curriculum design project and a literature review. Pedagogic Research in Maximising Education, 3(2), 17–26.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Burr, V. (2003). Social constructionism (2nd ed.). London, New York: Routledge.
Carless, D. (2007). Learning-oriented assessment: Conceptual bases and practical implications. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 44(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290601081332.
Carless, D. (2019). Feedback loops and the longer-term: Towards feedback spirals. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5), 705–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1531108.
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
Chamberlain, J. (2012). Grades and attendance: Is there a link between them with respect to first year undergraduate criminology students? Educational Research and Reviews, 7(1), 5–9.
Cook-Sather, A. (2018). Listening to equity-seeking perspectives: How students’ experiences of pedagogical partnership can inform wider discussions of student success. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(5), 923–936.
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Devlin, M., Kift, S., Nelson, K., Smith, L., & McKay, J. (2012). Effective teaching and support of students from low socioeconomic status backgrounds: Practical advice for teaching staff. Retrieved from http://www.lowses.edu.au/assets/Practical%20Advice%20for%20Teaching%20Staff.pdf.
Finnane, M. (2006). The ABC of Criminology: Anita Muhl, JV Barry, Norval Morris and the making of a discipline in Australia. British Journal of Criminology, 46(3), 399–422.
Gale, T., & Mills, C. (2013). Creating spaces in higher education for marginalised Australians: Principles for socially inclusive pedagogies. Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences, 5(2), 7–19.
Goldingay, S., Hitch, D., Ryan, J., Farrugia, D., Hosken, N., Lamaro, G., & Macfarlane, S. (2014). “The university didn’t actually tell us this is what you have to do”: Social inclusion through embedding of academic skills in first year professional courses. International Journal of The First Year Experience, 5(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.5204/intjfyhe.v5i1.194.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Hockings, C. (2010). Inclusive learning and teaching in higher education: A Synthesis of research. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/resources/detail/evidencenet/Inclusive_learning_and_teaching_in_higher_education.
Hockings, C. (2011). Hearing voices, creating spaces: The craft of the ‘artisan teacher’ in a mass higher education system. Critical Studies in Education, 52(2), 191–205.
Howes, L. M. (2017). Critical thinking in criminology: Critical reflections on learning and teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(8), 891–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1319810.
Kift, S., Nelson, K., & Clarke, J. (2010). Transition pedagogy: A third generation approach to FYE—A case study of policy and practice for the higher education sector. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 1(10), 1–20.
Lea, M., & Street, B. (2006). The ‘academic literacies’ model: Theory and applications. Theory into Practice, 45(4), 368–377.
Lubicz-Nawrocka, T. (2018). From partnership to self-authorship: The benefits of co-creation of the curriculum. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3207.
Molesworth, M., Nixon, E., & Scullion, R. (2009). Having, being and higher education: The marketisation of the university and the transformation of the student into consumer. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(3), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510902898841.
Moreau, M. P., & Leathwood, C. (2006). Balancing paid work and studies: Working (-class) students in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31(1), 23–42.
Norton, A. (2016). Equity and markets. In A. Harvey, C. Burnheim, & M. Brett (Eds.), Student equity in Australian higher education: Twenty-five years of a fair chance for all (pp. 183–206). New York, NY: Springer.
O’Shea, S., & Delahunty, J. (2018). Getting through the day and still having a smile on my face! How do students define success in the university learning environment? Higher Education Research & Development, 37(5), 1062–1075.
Palmer, L., Levett-Jones, T., & Smith, R. (2018). First year students’ perceptions of academic literacies preparedness and embedded diagnostic assessment. Student Success, 9(2), 49–61. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.lib.rmit.edu.au/10.5204/ssj.v9i2.417.
Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2011). Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.483513.
Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Montgomery, C. (2012). Assessment for learning in higher education. New York, NY: Routledge.
Sikes, P. J., & Potts, A. (2008). Researching education for the inside. Investigations from within. London, New York: Routledge.
Sloan, J. J., & Buchwalter, J. W. (2017). The state of criminal justice bachelor’s degree programs in the United States: Institutional, departmental, and curricula features. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 28(3), 307–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2016.1240212.
Thies, L., Wallis, A., Turner, A., & Wishart, L. (2014). Embedded academic literacies curricula: The challenges of measuring success. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 8(1), A43–A59.
Thomas, L., & May, H. (2010). Inclusive learning and teaching in higher education final report. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/inclusivelearningandteaching_finalreport.
Wagers, S., Pate, M., Turmel, S., & Burke, J. (2018). What motivates today’s criminal justice student to become an engaged learner? Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 29(1), 18–38.
Wimhurst, K. (2011). Applying threshold concepts theory to an unsettled field: An exploratory study in criminal justice education. Studies in Higher Education, 36(3), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903556063.
Wingate, U. (2015). Academic literacy and student diversity: The case for inclusive practice. Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.
Yang, M., & Carless, D. (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.719154.
Funding
This work was funded in 2018 by small grants from the RMIT University Belonging initiative and from the Criminology and Justice Studies discipline in the School of Global, Urban and Social Studies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ryan, J., McLean, H., Hamilton, G., Liston, R., Stratton, G., Hiscock, R. (2019). Embedding Academic Literacies for Belonging in First Year Criminology. In: Tynan, B., McLaughlin, T., Chester, A., Hall-van den Elsen, C., Kennedy, B. (eds) Transformations in Tertiary Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9957-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9957-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9956-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9957-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)