Abstract
Researching youth violence raises difficult questions about normative assumptions and the ethical problems of universalising and relativistic epistemologies. Furthermore, the study of youth as not simply an abstract concept, but as an idea that concerns real, feeling and conscious subjects, raises questions for violence studies about the focus of the research and its participatory nature. In this chapter, I examine these issues and raise the possibility of ‘epistemological violence’ (Teo, 2010) when studying youth violence. I begin the chapter with by clarification my use of the terms ‘subjective’ and ‘objective’ concerning violence and epistemologies. Having clarified these terms, I turn to examine the strengths and weaknesses of universalising and relativising epistemologies for studying youth violence. Subsequently, I argue that Political Fractionality offers a framework that avoids synergistic solutions and requires researchers to examine the effects of their political and ethical orientations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be?. Frenchs Forrest, NSW: Pearson.
Becker, H. S. (1967). Whose side are we on. Social Problems, 14(3), 239–247.
Bufacchi, V. (2005). Two concepts of violence. Political Studies Review, 3(2), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9299.2005.00023.x.
Butler, J. (2010). Performative agency. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3(2), 147–161.
Davies, B. (1991). The concept of agency: A feminist poststructuralist analysis. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice (30), 42–53.
Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: SAGE.
Farrugia, D. (2013). The possibility of symbolic violence in interviews with young people experiencing homelessness. In K. Te Riele & R. Brooks (Eds.), Negotiating ethical challenges in youth research (pp. 111–121). Taylor and Francis.
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (1986). The foucault reader. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (1988). Politics philosophy, culture; interviews and other writings 1977–1984 (A. Sheridan & L. D. Kritzman, Trans.). London: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1997). Ethics, subjectivity and truth (Vol. 1). New York: The New Press.
Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace and peace research. Journal of peace research, 6(3), 167–191.
Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural violence. Journal of peace research, 27(3), 291–305.
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis (Vol. 241). Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Giddens, A. (1982). Sociology: A brief but critical introduction. London: The Macmillan Press LTD.
Gillies, V., & Robinson, Y. (2012). Developing creative research methods with challenging pupils. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2012.649407.
Kelly, P., & Kamp, A. (2014). An ‘untimely’ youth studies? In P. Kelly & A. Kamp (Eds.), A critical youth studies for the 21st century (pp. 526–533). Boston: Brill.
Latour, B. (1999). On recalling ANT. The Sociological Review, 47(S1), 15–25.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
Law, J. (2008). Sociology and STS. The Sociological Review, 56(4), 623–627. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.2008.00808.x.
Law, J., & Urry, J. (2004). Enacting the social. Economy and Society, 33(3), 390–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/0308514042000225716.
Lomax, H. (2005). Contested voices? Methodological issues in visual research with children. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15(2), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2012.649408.
MacDonald, R. (2006). Social exclusion, youth transitions and criminal careers: Five critical reflections on ‘risk’. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 39(3), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1375/acri.39.3.371.
MacDonald, R. (2009). Precarious work: Risk, choice and poverty traps. In A. Furlong (Ed.), Handbook of youth and young adulthood: New perspectives and agendas (1st ed., pp. 167–175). Oxon, UK: Taylor and Francis.
MacDonald, R. (2016). Precarious work: The growing precarité of youth. In A. Furlong (Ed.), Routledge handbook of youth and young adulthood (2nd ed.). Oxon: Routledge.
Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics. A word and some questions. The Sociological Review, 47(1), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.1999.tb03483.x.
Nico, M. (2014). Beyond ‘biographical’ and ‘cultural illusions’ in European youth studies: Temporality and critical youth studies. A critical youth studies for the 21st century (pp. 53–69). Boston: Brill.
Powell, J. L., & Edwards, M. (2003). Risk and youth: A critical sociological narrative. International Journal of Sociology and Social policy, 23(12), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330310790417.
Scott, S. (2014). Making sense of everyday life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Sercombe, H. (1992). Youth theory: Marx or Foucault response to Tait. Youth Studies Australia, 11(2), 51–54.
Sercombe, H. (2010). Youth work ethics. London: SAGE Publications.
Shildrick, T., MacDonald, R., & Furlong, A. (2016). Not single spies but in battalions: A critical, sociological engagement with the idea of so-called ‘troubled families’. The Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954x.12425.
Strega, S. (2005). The view from the poststructural margins. In L. A. Brown & S. Strega (Eds.), Research as resistance (pp. 199–235). Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press.
Teo, T. (2010). What is epistemological violence in the empirical social sciences? Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(5), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00265.xC.
Walsh, L., & Black, R. (2014). The ambiguous mobilities of young Australians. In P. Kelly & A. Kamp (Eds.), A critical youth studies for the 21st century. Brill: Leiden, Boston.
White, R., & Wyn, J. (2011). Youth and society: Exploring the social dynamics of youth experience (2nd ed.). South Melbourne, Victoria: Oxford University Press.
Wieviorka, M. (2005). Violence: A New Approach (D. Macey, Trans.). London: SAGE.
Wieviorka, M. (2014). The sociological analysis of violence: New perspectives. The Sociological Review, 62(S2), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12191.
Woodman, D., & Threadgold, S. (2011). The future of the sociology of youth. Youth Studies Australia, 30(3), 8–12.
Woodman, D., & Threadgold, S. (2014). Critical youth studies in an individualized and globalized world: Making the most of Bourdieu and Beck. A critical youth studies for the 21st century (pp. 552–566). Brill: Leiden, Boston.
Wyn, J., & White, R. (1997). Rethinking youth. London: SAGE.
Youth Affairs Council of Western Australia. (2003). Code of ethics for youth work. West Leederville, Perth, Australia: Youth Affairs Council of Western Australia.
Zizek, S. (2008). Violence: Six sideways reflections. London, UK: Profile Books LTD.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lohmeyer, B.A. (2020). Political Fractionality and Epistemological Violence. In: Youth and Violent Performativities. Perspectives on Children and Young People, vol 11. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5542-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5542-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-5541-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-5542-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)