Abstract
Young children are increasingly engaging with digital technologies in their homes and in pre-schools around Australia, however there is a lack of understanding about the type of early years pedagogy needed to support children’s play and learning with digital technologies. This chapter examines research in three preschool settings in which educators introduced digital technologies to their children. In the three case studies, we are reporting on the actions, dispositions and behaviours of the children as captured by the chosen moments informed by our observations (field notes and observational templates) and teachers’ comments (in response to interviews). Our research questioned how robotic devices such as Beebots could support and complement children’s STEM learning. Data were analysed using a deductive thematic approach and an instructional embodiment framework that considered how physical and imaginary embodied cognition were apparent in the children’s interactions and experiences with tangible coding technologies such as Beebots. We found that embodied cognition was embedded in a variety of STEM play situations and was integral to the development of children’s learning. Children’s pretend play aligned with imagined embodiment and was influential in a variety of play situations, enabling digital learning. We found that Beebots did afford embodied learning and the research demonstrates the potential for facilitating imaginative embodiment in the context of play-based learning. Beebots can form part of a rich teaching and learning technologies environment and must be considered as part of the physical makeup of the educational context. Digital technologies in play-based learning should be considered as part of teachers’ planning and designing of the learning environment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anwar, S., & Menekse, M. (2021). A systematic review of observation protocols used in postsecondary STEM classrooms. Review of Education, 9(1), 81–120.
Baccaglini-Frank, A. E., Santi, G., Del Zozzo, A., & Frank, E. (2020). Teachers’ perspectives on the intertwining of tangible and digital modes of activity with a drawing robot for geometry. Education Sciences, 10(12), 387–408.
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617–645.
Bers, M. (2008). Blocks to robots: Learning with technology in the early childhood classroom. Teachers College Press.
Berson, I. R., Murcia, K., Berson, M. J., & Damjanovic, V. (2019). Tangible digital play in Australian and US preschools. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 55(2), 78–84.
Black, J. B., Segal, A., Vitale, J., & Fadjo, C. (2012). Embodied cognition and learning environment design. In D. Jonassen & S. Lamb (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of student-centered learning environments (pp. 198–223). Routledge.
Blatter, J. K. (2008). Case study. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 68–72). SAGE Publications.
Borghi, A., Scorolli, C., Caligiore, D., Baldassarre, G., & Tummolini, L. (2013). The embodied mind extended: Using words as social tools. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00214
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
Brenner, M. E. (2006). Interviewing in educational research. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 357–370). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Campbell, C., Speldewinde, C., Howitt, C., & MacDonald, A. (2018). STEM practice in the early years. Creative Education Journal Special Edition Preschool Education Research, 9(1).
Campbell, C. (2020). Learning about STEM. In A. Kilderry & B. Raban (Eds.), Strong foundations: Evidence informing practice in early childhood. Publisher ACER (Australian Council for Educational Research). https://research.acer.edu.au/strong-foundations/13/
Campbell, C., & Speldewinde, C. (2020). Affordances for science learning in ‘Bush Kinders.’ International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 28(3), 1–13.
Çetin, M., & Demircan, H. Ö. (2020). STEM education in early childhood. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 21(1), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.437445
Chan, K. K. (2020). Using tangible objects in early childhood classrooms: A study of Macau pre-service teachers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48, 441–450.
Crawford, B. (2015). Authentic science. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2150-0_144
Department of Education (DET). (2017). Practice principle guide—Integrated teaching and learning approaches. https://www.education.vic.gov.au/childhood/professionals/learning/Pages/veyldfproflearn.aspx
Edwards, S. (2016). New concepts of play and the problem of technology, digital media and popular-culture integration with play-based learning in early childhood education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(4), 513–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2015.1108929
Edwards, S. (2017). Play-based learning and intentional teaching: Forever different? Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 42(2), 4–11.
Edwards, S., & Bird, J. (2015). Observing and assessing young children’s digital play in the early years: Using the digital play framework. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 15(2), 158–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X15579746
Ferguson, J. P., Aranda, G., Tytler, R., & Gorur, R. (2019). Video research—Purposeful selection from rich data sets. In L. Xu, G. Aranda, W. Widjaja, & D. Clarke (Eds.), Video-based research in education—Cross-disciplinary perspectives (pp. 124–139). Routledge.
Final BOTSTEM 01A1 Report. (2017). Written for the European Commission and Erasmus. https://www.botstem.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/FINAL-BOTSTEM_O1A1_report.pdf
Flannery, L., & Bers, M. (2013). Let’s dance the “Robot Hokey-Pokey!” Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2013.10782614
Fleer, M. (2011). ‘Conceptual Play’: Foregrounding imagination and cognition during concept formation in early years education. Contemporary issues in Early Childhood 12(3) https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2011.12.3.224
Fleer, M. (2017). Digital pedagogy: How teachers support digital play in the early years. In J. Bowen (Ed.), Digital technologies and learning in the early years (pp. 114–126). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Fleer, M. (2018). Conceptual playworlds: The role of imagination in play and learning. Early Years. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2018.1549024
Fleer, M. (2019). Play in the early years (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Fugate, J. M. B., Macrine, S. L., & Cipriano, C. (2019). The role of embodied cognition for transforming learning. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 7(4), 274–288.
Gibson, M., & Gunn, L. (2020). The early childhood professional. In A. Kilderry & B. Raban (Eds.), Strong foundations: Evidence informing practice in early childhood. Publisher ACER (Australian Council for Educational Research). https://research.acer.edu.au/strong-foundations/13/
Greenbank, P. (2012). Implementing an action research project: A case study in making decisions and managing challenges. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 36(2), 145–161.
Hachey, A. C., An, S. A., & Golding, D. E. (2021). Nurturing kindergarteners’ early STEM academic identity through makerspace pedagogy. Early Childhood Educational Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01154-9
Hayes, J. C., & Kraemer, D. J. M. (2017). Grounded understanding of abstract concepts: The case of STEM learning. Cognitive Research: Principles & Implications, 2(7). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0046-z
Hedges, H. (2012). Teachers’ funds of knowledge: A challenge to evidence-based practice. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 18(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2011.622548
Hedges, H., & Cooper, M. (2016). Collaborative meaning-making using video footage: Teachers and researchers analyse children’s working theories about friendship. European Early childhood Education Research Journal, 398–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2016.1252153
Ioannou, M., & Ioannou, A. (2020). Technology enhanced embodied learning: Designing and evaluating a new classroom experience. Educational Technology & Society, 23(3), 81–94.
Jiang, Y., & Zheng, C. (2021). New methods to support effective collaborative reflection among kindergarten teachers: An action research approach. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49, 247–258.
Kang, J., Diederich, M., Lindgren, R., & Junokas, M. (2021). Gesture patterns and learning in an embodied XR science simulation. Educational Technology & Society, 24(2), 77–92.
Kermani, H., & Aldemir, J. (2015). Preparing children for success: Integrating science, math, and technology in early childhood classroom. Early Child Development and Care, 185(9), 1504–1527.
Keune, A., & Peppler, K. (2019). Materials-to-develop-with: The making of a makerspace. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50, 280–293.
Levy, D., & Mioduser, S. T. (2010). Making sense by building sense: Kindergarten children’s construction and understanding of adaptive robot behaviors. International Journal of Computers for Mathematics Learning, 15, 99–127.
Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. E. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: A systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(11). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6
Ljunggren, A. (2016). Multilingual affordances in a Swedish preschool: An action research project. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44, 605–612.
Mathayas, N., Brown, D. E., & Lindgren, R. (2021). “I got to see, and I got to be a part of it”: How cued gesturing facilitates middle-school students’ explanatory modeling of thermal conduction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21718
Milford, T., & Tippett, C. (2015). The design and validation of an early childhood STEM classroom observational protocol. International Research in Early Childhood Education, 6, 24–37.
Moomaw, S. (2013). Teaching STEM in the early years: Activities for integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Redleaf Press.
Murcia, K., Campbell, C., & Aranda, G. (2018). Trends in early childhood education practice and professional learning with digital technologies. Pedagogika, 68(3), 249–264.
Murcia, K., & Tang, K. S. (2019). Exploring the multimodality of young children’s coding. Australian Educational Computing, 34(1), 1–15.
Newhouse, C. P., Cooper, M., & Cordery, Z. (2017). Programmable toys and free play in early childhood classrooms. Australian Educational Computing, 32(1), 1–15.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13.
Phillippi, J., & Lauderdale, J. (2018). A guide to field notes for qualitative research: Context and conversation. Qualitative Health Research, 28(3), 381–388.
Pyle, A., & Danniels, E. (2017). A continuum of play-based learning: The role of the teacher in play-based pedagogy and the fear of hijacking play. Early Education and Development, 274–289. Published online: 12 Sept 2016
Reinhold, F., Hoch, S., Werner, B., Richter-Gebert, J., & Reiss, K. (2020). Learning fractions with and without educational technology: What matters for high-achieving and low-achieving students? Learning & Instruction, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101264
Roessingh, H., & Bence, M. (2018). Embodied cognition: Laying the foundation for early language and literacy learning. Language & Literacy, 20(4), 23–39.
Speldewinde, C., Kilderry, A., & Campbell, C. (2020). Beyond the preschool gate: Pedagogical opportunities in the Australian ‘bush kinder’. International Journal of Early Years Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2020.1850432
Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2016). Robotics in the early childhood classroom: Learning outcomes from an 8-week robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten through second grade. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9304-5
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Weisberg, S. M., & Newcombe, N. S. (2017). Embodied cognition and STEM learning: Overview of a topical collection in CR:PI. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0071-6
Wellsby, M., & Paxman, P. M. (2014). Developing embodied cognition: Insights from children’s concepts and language processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–10.
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636.
Wilson, R. A., & Foglia, L. (2017). Embodied cognition. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/embodied-cognition/
Wood, E. (2007). Play policy and practice-direction of travel or collision course? Education, 3–13, 35(4), 309–320.
Yıldırım, B. (2021). Preschool STEM activities: Preschool teachers’ preparation and views. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49, 149–162.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aranda, G., Campbell, C., Ferguson, J., Speldewinde, C. (2022). Introducing Digital Technologies into Play-Based Learning in Early Childhood. In: Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M. (eds) STEM, Robotics, Mobile Apps in Early Childhood and Primary Education. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0568-1_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0568-1_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0567-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-0568-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)