Abstract
The third sector is one of the main partners for European governments in policy development and implementation. However, the relationship has often been a delicate one, touching on issues of autonomy and legitimacy. In this chapter, we give an overview of different theoretical reasons for and types of collaboration between the third sector and the state. We also describe the different traditions of collaboration that have emerged across Europe. Finally, we discuss the risks associated with this kind of relationship.
References
Baring Foundation. (2013). Independence under threat: The voluntary sector in 2013. London: The Baring Foundation.
Bell, S., Hindmoor, A., & Mols, F. (2010). Persuation and governance: A state-centric relational perspective. Public Administration, 88(3), 851–870.
Beller, A., & Haß, R. (2014). New challenges for the cooperation between civil society and the public sector—The Federal Volunteer Service in Germany. In T. Brandsen, W. Trommel, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Manufactured civil society: Practices, principles and effects (pp. 116–135). Palgrave.
Bode, I., & Brandsen, T. (2014). State—Third sector partnerships: A short overview of key issues in the debate: Introduction to the special issue on state—Third sector partnerships. Public Management Review, 16, 1055–1066.
Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2010). Governance without a state: Can it work? Regulation and Governance, 4, 113–134.
Brandsen, T., & Pape, U. (2015). The Netherlands: The paradox of government non profit partnership. Voluntas, 26, 2267–2282.
Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2016). Distinguishing different types of co-production: A conceptual analysis based on the classical definitions. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 427–435.
Brandsen, T., van de Donk, W., & Putters, K. (2005). Griffins or chameleons? Hybridity as a permanent and inevitable characteristic of the third sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 749–765.
Brandsen, T., Trommel, W., & Verschuere, B. (2015). The state and the reconstruction of civil society. International Review of Administrative Sciences. Published on November 4. doi:10.1177/0020852315592467.
Brinkerhoff, J. (2002). Government-nonprofit partnership: A defining framework. Public Administration and Development, 22, 19–30.
Brinkerhoff, J., & Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2002). Government-nonprofit relations in comparative perspective: Evolution, themes and new directions. Public Administration & Development, 22, 3–18.
Cornforth, C. H. (2015). Nonprofit-public collaborations: Understanding governance dynamic. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44, 775–795.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Evers, A. (2005). Mixed welfare systems and hybrid organizations: Changes in the governance and provision of social services. International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 737–748.
Evers, A., & Laville, J. L. (2004). Defining the third sector in Europe. In A. Evers & J. L. Laville (Eds.), The third sector in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Fenwick, J., Miller Johnston, K., & McTavish, D. (2012). Co-governance or meta bureaucracy: Perspectives of local governance “partnerships” in England and Scotland. Policy and Politics, 40, 405–422.
Gazley, B. (2010). Linking collaborative capacity to performance measurement in government-nonprofit partnerships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39, 653–673.
Guo, C. A. (2005). Understanding collaboration among nonprofit organizations: Combining resource dependency; institutional, and network perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34, 340–361.
Henriksen, L. S., Smith, R., & Zimmer, A. (2012). At the eve of convergence? Transformations of social service provision in Denmark, Germany and the United States. Voluntas, 23, 458–501.
Hill, C., & Lynn, L. E. (2003). Producing human services: Why do agencies collborate? Public Management Review, 5, 63–81.
Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (1996). Working together: Key themes in the management of the relationship between public and non-profit organizations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 9, 5–17.
Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2000). Ambiguity, complexity and dynamics of membership of collaboration. Human Relations, 53, 771–806.
Jenei, G., & Kuti, E. (2007). The third sector and civil society. In S. Osborne (Ed.), Third sector in Europe: Prospects and challenges (pp. 9–25). London: Routledge.
Jessop, B. (2004). Multi-level governance and multi-level meta-governance. In I. Bache & M. Flinders (Eds.), Multi-level governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnston, K. (2015). Public governance: The government of non-state actors in “partnerships”. Public Money and Management, 35, 15–22.
Keast, R., & Mandell, M. (2012). The collaborative push: Moving beyond the rhetoric and gaining evidence. Journal of Managing Governance, 18, 9–28.
Kramer, R. (1981). Voluntary sector in the welfare state. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Milbourne, L., & Cushman, M. (2013). From the third sector to the big society: How changing UK government policies have eroded third sector trust. Voluntas, 24, 485–508.
O’Flynn, J. (2009). The cult of collaboration in public policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68, 112–116.
Osborne, S. (2009). Delivering public services: Are we asking the right questions? Public Money and Management, 29, 5–7.
Osborne, S. P. (Ed.). (2010) The new public governance? New perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. New York: Routledge.
Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., et al. (1981). Consumers as co-producers of public services: Some institutional and economic considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9, 1001–1011.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. NewYork: Harper and Row.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (2000). Governance in public administration. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance: Authority, steering and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (2011). The governance narrative: Key findings and lessons from the ESRC’s Whitehall Programme. In R. A. W. Rhodes (Ed.), Public administration 25 years of analysis and debate. Chichester: Wiley.
Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Salamon, L. M., & Sokolowski, S. W. (2016). Beyond nonprofits: Re-conceptualizing the third sector. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(4), 1515–1545.
Salamon, L. M., Sokolowski, S. W., Haddock, M. A., & Tice, H. S. (2013). The state of global civil society and volunteering: Latest findings from the implementation of the UN nonprofit handbook. Baltimore, MA.: Johns Hopkins University Center for Civil Society Studies.
Skelcher, C., Mathur, N., & Smith, M. (2005). The public governance of collaborative spaces: Discourse, design and democracy. Public Administration, 83, 573–596.
Smith, S. R., & Lipsky, M. (1993). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2005). Network governance and post-liberal democracy. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27, 197–237.
Sowa, J. (2009). The collaboration decision in nonprofit organizations: Views from the front line. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38, 1003–1025.
United Nations. (1994). Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Partnership with the Non-Governmental Sector. Retrieved October 26, 2015, from UN programme of action. http://www.iisd.ca/cairo/program/p15001.html.
Van Eijk, C., & Steen, T. (2015). Why engage in co-production of public services? Mixing theory and empirical evidence. Retrieved October 27, 2015, from International Review of Administrative Sciences: www.ras.sagepub.com.
Wijkström, F., & Zimmer, A. (Eds.). (2011). Nordic civil society at the crossroads: Transforming the popular movement tradition. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Zimmer, A. (1999). Corporatism revisited. The legacy of history and the German non-profit-sector. Voluntas, 10, 37–49.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brandsen, T., Johnston, K. (2018). Collaborative Governance and the Third Sector: Something Old, Something New. In: Ongaro, E., Van Thiel, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55268-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55269-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)