Skip to main content

Parting Ways: The German-American Relationship after Iraq

  • Chapter
Germany’s Uncertain Power

Part of the book series: New Perspective in German Studies ((NPG))

Abstract

The US–German relationship was an especially close one during the Cold War, culminating in President George H.W. Bush’s call in 1989 for Germany to join America as a partner in leadership. The rapid deterioration that occurred because of differences over the Iraq war has lead many on both sides of the Atlantic to attribute the conflict to the leaders involved. Both the German leadership and the public believe that George W. Bush and his group of radicals are to blame for this friction and that, once he is gone, things will return to some semblance of normalcy. On the American side, there is also a sense that a change in leadership will heal the wounds. Many conservatives share the view of two of the most vocal American neoconservatives, Richard Perle and David Frum, who wrote, “We are optimistic that once Chancellor Schröder leaves the scene, Germany will revert to its accustomed friendliness.”1 During the 2004 presidential campaign, Democrats argued that a John Kerry administration would have facilitated the return to a more allianceoriented foreign policy and a rapprochement with Germany.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  • David Frum and Richard Perle, An End to Evil: How to Win the War on Terror (New York: Random House, 2003), p. 248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuel R. Berger, “Foreign Policy for a Democratic President,” Foreign Affairs, 83: 3 (May/June 2004): 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James Sperling, “The Foreign Policy of the Berlin Republic: The Very Model of a Post-Modern Major Power?,” German Politics, 13: 1 (2004): 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. W. DePorte, Europe Between the Superpowers: The Enduring Balance (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • David Calleo, The German Problem Reconsidered (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sebastian Harnisch and Hanns W. Maull, eds, Germany as a Civilian Power? The foreign policy of the Berlin Republic (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanns W. Maull, “Zivilmacht Bundesrepublik Deutschland,” Europa Archiv, 47: 10 (1992): 269–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanns W. Maull, “Germany and Japan: The New Civilian Powers,” Foreign Affairs, 69 (winter 1990/91): 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich August Winkler, Der lange Weg nach Westen: vom Dritten Reich bis zur Wiedervereinigung, vol. II (Munich: Beck Verlag, 2000), p. 655.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey S. Lantis, Strategic Dilemmas and the Evolution of German Foreign Policy since Unification (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2002), pp. 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen M. Walt, “Two Cheers for Clinton’s Foreign Policy,” Foreign Affairs, 79 (March/April 2000): 64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John Ikenberry, ed., America Unrivaled: The Future of the Balance of Power (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2002), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ted Galen Carpenter, Peace and Freedom: Foreign Policy for a Constitutional Republic (Washington: The Cato Institute, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quentin Peel, “Caught in the Web of Nation Building,” Financial Times, October 16, 2002, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frances Fitzgerald, “George Bush and the World,” The New York Review of Books, September 26, 2002, pp. 80–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • James Mann, The Rise of the Vulcans: The History of Bush’s War Cabinet (New York: Viking, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst Teltschik, 329 Tage: Innenausichten der Einigung (Berlin: Siedler, 1991), p. 222.

    Google Scholar 

  • George Szamuely, “Clinton’s Clumsy Encounter with the World,” Orbis, 38 (summer 1994): 373–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronald D. Asmus, Opening NATO’s Door: How the Alliance Remade Itself for a New Era (New York: Columbia University Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Daalder and James M. Lindsay, America Unbound: The Bush Revolution in Foreign Policy (Washington: The Brookings Institution Press, 2003), especially Chapters 1 and 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Parker, “A Nation Apart: A Survey of America,” The Economist, November 8, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter Steinfels, The Neoconservatives: The Men Who Are Changing America’s Politics (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1979), p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen Fidler and Gerald Baker, “America’s democratic imperialists,” Financial Times, March 6, 2003, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas E. Ricks, “Holding Their Ground,” The Washington Post, December 23, 2003, pp. C 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter Russell Mead, “The Jacksonian Tradition and American Foreign Policy,” The National Interest (winter 1999/2000): 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaus Larres, “Mutual Incomprehension: US–German Value Gaps Beyond Iraq,” The Washington Quarterly, 26: 2 (spring 2003): 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anja Dalgaard-Nielsen, “Gulf War: The German Resistance,” Survival, 45: 1 (spring 2003): 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunther Hellman, “Deutschland in Europa: eine symbiotische Beziehung,” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 48 (2002): 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edward Pilkington and Ewen MacAskill, “Europe lacks moral fibre says US hawk,” The Guardian, November 13, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles Krauthammer, “Don’t Go Back to the U. N.”, The Washington Post, March 21, 2003, p. A 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmut Schmidt, “Europa braucht keinen Vormund,” Die Zeit, August 5, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen F. Szabo, Parting Ways: The Crisis in German-American Relations (Washington: The Brookings Institution Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel S. Hamilton and Joseph P. Quinlan, Partners in Prosperity: The Changing Geography of the Transatlantic Economy (Washington: The Center for Transatlantic Relations, Johns Hopkins University, SAIS, 2004), pp. 108–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Parker, “A Nation Apart: A Survey of America,” The Economist, November 8, 2003, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, “The 2004 Political Landscape: Evenly Divided and Increasingly Polarized,” November 5, 2003, pp. 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis Fukuyama, “The Neoconservative Moment,” The National Interest (summer 2004): 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. John Ikenberry, “The End of the Neo-conservative Moment,” Survival, 46 (spring 2004): 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2006 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Szabo, S.F. (2006). Parting Ways: The German-American Relationship after Iraq. In: Maull, H.W. (eds) Germany’s Uncertain Power. New Perspective in German Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504189_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics