Skip to main content

The Reluctant Ally? Germany, NATO and the Use of Force

  • Chapter
NATO’s European Allies

Abstract

Germany’s behaviour in the run-up of NATO’s 2011 Operation Unified Protector (OUP) in Libya came as a surprise to many allies since Germany did not participate in a military operation which fulfilled the criteria of a right cause (a ‘responsibility to protect’) and proper authority (a UN Security Council mandate), and which was supported by its most important European allies, France and Germany. Consequently, Germany was accused by the international media of moving away from ‘European unity’ while German commentators explained this decision with the country’s pacifist preference, immaturity in foreign and security policy and a preoccupation with domestic politics (Erlanger and Dempsey, 2011). German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle also pointed to his country’s ‘tradition of [military] restraint’ as an explanation for Germany’s abstention (Der Spiegel, 2011).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Asmus, R. (1994) German Strategy and Public Opinion after the Wall, 1990–1993 (Santa Monica, CA: RAND).

    Google Scholar 

  • Atlantic Council (2012) Anchoring the Alliance (Washington, DC: Atlantic Council).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, R. and Hellmann, G. (2001) ‘Germany and the Use of Military Force: “Total War”, the “Culture of Restraint” and the Quest for Normality’, German Politics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 61–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, T.U. (1998) Cultures of Antimilitarism. National Security in Germany and Japan (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertram, C. (2008) ‘Afghanistan ist kein Bündnisfall’, Die Zeit, 16 February, http://www.zeit.de/online/2008/08/nato-kolumne-bertram, accessed 26 September 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brössler, D. (2011) ‘Wir woollen nicht Kriegspartei warden’, Süddeutsche Zeitung, 17 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buras, P. and Longhurst, K. (2004) ‘The Berlin Republic, Iraq, and the Use of Force’, European Security, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 215–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalgaard-Nielsen, A. (2003) ‘Gulf War: The German Resistance’, Survival, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demmer, U. and Schult, C. (2012) ‘Unreliable Partners? Germany’s Reputation in NATO Has Hit Rock Bottom’, Der Spiegel, 17 May, http://www.spiegel.de (homepage), date accessed 2 July 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Der Spiegel (2011) ‘Spiegel Interview with German Foreign Minister’, 21 March, http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,752164,00.html, date accessed 26 September 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dettke, D. (2009) Germany Says ‘No’: The Iraq War and the Future of German Foreign and Security Policy (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, J.S. (1999) ‘Political Culture and State Behavior: Why Germany Confounds Neorealism’, International Organization, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 765–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erlanger, S. and Dempsey, J. (2011) ‘Germany Steps away From European Unity’, New York Times, 23 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Ministry of Defence (2003) Verteidigungspolitische Richtlinien (Berlin: Federal Ministry of Defence).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Ministry of Defence (2004) Konzeption der Bundeswehr (Berlin: Federal Ministry of Defence).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Ministry of Defence (2006) German Security Policy and the Future of the Bundeswehr (Berlin: Federal Ministry of Defence).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Ministry of Defence (2011) Defence Policy Guidelines 2011 (Berlin: Federal Ministry of Defence).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Ministry of Defence (2012a) Neuausrichtung der Bundeswehr (Berlin: Federal Ministry of Defence).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Ministry of Defence (2012b), TodesfälleimAuslandseinsatz, http://www.bundeswehr.de (homepage), date accessed 15 May 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haftendorn, H. (2008) ‘The View from Berlin: Germany as a Self-assured European Middle Power’, in Peter Schmidt (ed.) A Hybrid Relationship: Transatlantic Security Cooperation Beyond NATO (Frankfurt: Peter Lang), pp. 213–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallams, E. and Schreer, B. (2012) ‘Towards a Post-American Alliance? NATO Burden-sharing after Libya’, International Affairs, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellmann, G. (2011) ‘Berlin, Great Power Politics, and Libya’, Commentaries, American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, 22 September, http://www.aicgs.org/issue/berlin-great-power-politics-and-libya/, accessed 26 September 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde-Price, A. (2001) ‘Germany and the Kosovo War: Still a Civilian Power?’, German Politics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • icasualties.org (2012) http://icasualties.org (homepage), date accessed 15 May 2012.

  • International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) (1992) The Military Balance, 1992–1993 (London: International Institute for Strategic Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Institute for Strategic Studies (2012) The Military Balance 2012 (London: International Institute for Strategic Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Joffe, J. (2011) ‘Der neue deutsche Sonderweg’, Handelsblatt, 30 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, P. (2012) ‘Germany and NATO: The Status Quo Ally’, Survival, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundnani, H. (2011) ‘Germany as a “Geo-economic” Power’, Washington Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maull, H.W. (1990) ‘Germany and Japan: The New Civilian Powers’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maull, H.W. (1992) ‘Zivilmacht Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Vierzehn Thesen-füreineneue deutsche Auβenpolitik’, Europa Archiv, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 269–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maull, H.W. (2000) ‘Germany and the Use of Force: Still a Civilian Power?’, Survival, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 56–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. (1990) ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War’, International Security, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 5–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New York Times News Service (1999) ‘Schroeder Signals Shift, Calls Germany a “Great Power” ‘, 12 September, http://articles.baltimoresun.com/1999-09-12/news/9909120181_1_germany-german-foreign-policy-chancellor

    Google Scholar 

  • Noetzel, T. and Schreer, B. (2008) ‘All the Way? The Evolution of German Military Power’, International Affairs, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noetzel, T. and Schreer, B. (2009a) ‘NATO’s Vietnam? Afghanistan and the Future of the Atlantic Alliance’, Contemporary Security Policy, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 529–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noetzel, T. and Schreer, B. (2009b) ‘Does a “Multi-tier” NATO Matter? The Atlantic Alliance and the Process of Strategic Change’, International Affairs, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 211–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, W.E. (1996) ‘Beyond Semi-sovereignty: The New Germany in a New Europe’, German Politics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 167–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarotte, M.E. (2001) German Military Reform and European Security, Adelphi Paper no. 340 (London: International Institute for Strategic Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreer, B. (2009) ‘A New “Pragmatism”: Germany’s NATO Policy’, International Journal, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 383–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, G. (1999) ‘Deutsche Sicherheitspolitik an der Schwelle des 21. Jahrhunderts’, Rede auf der 35. MünchenerSicherheitskonferenz, 6 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, K. (2012) ‘Germany Urged to Pay More on Defence’, Financial Times, 4 May 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockholm Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) (2012) Military Expenditure Database, http://milexdata.sipri.org (homepage), date accessed 9 May 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabo, S.F. and Hampton, M.N. (2003) ‘Reinventing the German Military’, AICGS Policy Report 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Thadden, R. (2011) ‘Woist das deutsch-französischePaar?’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 29 March 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, W. (1995) ‘Germany as the Leading Power in Europe’, The World Today, vol. 51, no. 8/9, pp. 162–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelikow, P. (2003) ‘The Transformation of National Security’, The National Interest, 1 March, pp. 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 B. Schreer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schreer, B. (2013). The Reluctant Ally? Germany, NATO and the Use of Force. In: Matlary, J.H., Petersson, M. (eds) NATO’s European Allies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137035004_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics