Abstract
The philosophical debate about the possibility of authentic a priori knowledge, that is, non-stipulative, non-trivial knowledge of the way the world necessarily is, obtained sufficiently independently of any and all sense-experiential episodes and/or contingent natural facts, is no less important today than it was when Plato posited in the Meno that we are able to have such knowledge owing to a pre-natal close encounter that our disembodied souls had with the Forms, and when Descartes posited in the Meditations on First Philosophy that such knowledge is infallible because guaranteed by a non-deceiving God. Of course, neither the platonic story nor the Cartesian story about our purported a priori abilities has many adherents today. Nevertheless, a large majority of philosophers (71.1 percent, according to a recent PhilPapers survey1) do indeed believe that a priori knowledge is really possible.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Andrew Chapman, Addison Ellis, Robert Hanna, Tyler Hildebrand, HenryW. Pickford
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chapman, A., Ellis, A., Hanna, R., Hildebrand, T., Pickford, H.W. (2013). Introduction: The Old Rationalism and the New Rationalism. In: In Defense of Intuitions. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137347954_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137347954_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46756-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-34795-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)