Abstract
There have been several claims that neuroscience will inform, and even transform, morality and, more precisely, ethics as a discipline. In this chapter, I first briefly review such claims and underscore how they are often supported by a positivist (or strong naturalistic) epistemology.1 I argue that this epistemology is at odds with the evolution of practical ethics and its integration of empirical research, as exemplified in the field of bioethics and the sub-field of neuroethics. One likely explanation for these prevailing positivist claims is that interpretations of neuroscientific knowledge are founded on a ubiquitous belief in the epistemic supremacy of neuroscientific explanations and their ability to provide ‘foundations’ for ethics. Such positivist claims, however, have triggered a strong backlash by raising assertions against the relevance of neuroscience in ethics. Taking a middle-ground perspective, I posit that a critical assessment of the contribution of neuroscience to ethics should not necessarily lead to a flat-out rejection of the potential for neuroscience to make important contributions to ethics, that is, anti-naturalism. One caveat is that neuroscience’s role in ethics may need to be situated within a comprehensive framework that underscores the role of interdisciplinary and empirical research as well as the ways evidence informs practical judgment in ethics. Thus, the second part of this chapter is dedicated to exploring a moderate form of naturalism inspired by the thinking of American philosopher John Dewey, in particular his views on the role and nature of evidence in ethics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Eric Racine, ‘Which Naturalism for Bioethics? A Defense of Moderate (Pragmatic) Naturalism’, Bioethics 22 (2008): 92–100.
Jean-Piene Changeux, ‘Le point de vue d’un neurobiologiste sur les fondements de l’éthique’, in Cerveau et psychisme humains: Quelle éthique?, ed. Gérard Huber (Paris: John Libbey Eurotext, 1996), pp. 97–109.
Jean-Pierre Changeux, ‘Les progrès des sciences du système nerveux concernent-ils les philosophes?’, Bulletin de la Société française de Philosophie 75 (1981): 73–105.
Michael S. Gazzaniga, The Ethical Brain (New York/Washington, D.C.: Dana Press, 2005).
Anonymous, ‘Does Neuroscience Threaten Human Values?’, Nature Neuroscience 1 (1998): 535–536.
Gérard Huber, ed. Cerveau et psychisme humains: Quelle éthique?, Collection Éthique et Sciences (Paris: John Libbey Eurotext, 1996).
Eric Racine, ‘Pragmatic Neuroethics: ImprovingTreatment and Understanding of the Mind-Brain’, Basic Bioethics, ed. Glen McGee and Arthur Caplan (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2010).
Michael Hagner, ‘Cultivating the Cortex in German Neuroanatomy’, Science in Context 14 (2001): 541–563.
Antonio R. Damasio, The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness (San Diego: Harvest Book Harcourt, 1999).
P.D. MacLean, ‘The Brain in Relation to Empathy and Medical Education’, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 144 (1967): 374–382.
Tristram Jr Engelhardt, ‘Splitting the Brain, Dividing the Soul, Being of Two Minds: An Editorial Concerning Mind-Body Quandaries in Medicine’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2 (1977): 89–100.
Adina Roskies, ‘Neuroethics for the New Millenium’, Neuron 35 (2002): 21–23.
William D. Casebeer, ‘Moral Cognition and Its Neural Constituents’, Nature Neuroscience 4 (2003): 841–846.
John Dewey, Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology (New York: Holt, 1922).
John Dewey, and James H. Tufts, Ethics (New York: Holt, 1932).
Glenn McGee, ed. Pragmatic Bioethics 2nd ed. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Eric Racine
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Racine, E. (2014). Pragmatism and the Contribution of Neuroscience to Ethics. In: Solymosi, T., Shook, J.R. (eds) Neuroscience, Neurophilosophy and Pragmatism. New Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137376077_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137376077_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47758-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37607-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)