Abstract
May 11, 2001 marked an important step toward protecting individual reproductive rights in Japan. On that day, after a legal struggle that began in 1998, the Kumamoto District Court ruled that the segregation of Hansen’s disease patients in state-run sanatoriums, which had gone on for over half a century, was unconstitutional. The lawsuit was in large part due to the need for a clear statement of state responsibility in a serious infringement of human rights–the violation of individuals’ reproductive rights through sterilization and abortion, mostly forced upon them in state sanatoriums.1 In one example, the head of a plaintiff’s group in western Japan, aged 82, acted to hold the state responsible for his forced sterilization. Hospitalized at 23 years of age in 1941, he married a woman at the facility and she became pregnant in 1943. When the pregnancy was discovered, she was forced to have an abortion and he was sterilized.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Mitsuda Kensuke, ‘Rai kyūsai no kokka teki kyūmu’, in Fujino (ed.), hansenbyō mondai siryō shūsei, hokan 16, pp. 1–4; Mitsuda Kensuke, ‘Taiwan rai yobō ho seitei ni kansuru ikensho’, in Tōfū kyōkai (ed.), Mitsuda Kensuke to nihon no rai yobō jigyō (Tōkyō: Tōfū kyōka, 1958), pp. 145–8.
Mitsuda Kensuke ‘Kantan naru yuseikan setsujo jutsu’, Hifuka hinyōkika zasshi 25, No. 5 (May 1925): 422–534;
Nojima Taiji, ‘Rai kanja ni okonaheru yuseikan setsujo jutsu rei ni tsuite’, Hifuka hinyōkika zasshi 31, No. 5 (May 1931): 174;
Nojima Taiji, ‘Rai no danshu mondai ni tsuite’, Hifuka hinyōkika zasshi 40, No. 4 (October 1925): 718;
Kawakami Yutaka, ‘Rai kanja ni hodoko-seru danshujutsu ni tsuite’, Hifuka hinyōkika zasshi 46, No. 2 (August 1939): 181.
Aoki Enshun, ‘Yūsei shujutsu ni tsuite’, Jinkō mondai kenkyū 1, No. 5 (August 1940): 9–14.
Arakawa Goro, ‘Yūsei hogo hōan’, in Matsubara Yuko (ed.), Sei to seishoku no jinken mondai siryō shūsei, Vol. 18 (Tōkyō: Fuji shuppan, 2001), pp. 2–4; ‘Yūsei danshu toha nani ka’, in Matsubara (ed.), Sei to seishoku, Vol. 26 (2002), pp. 279–81.
Matsubara Yuko, ‘The Enactment of Japan’s Sterilization Laws in the 1940s: A prelude to postwar eugenic policy’, Historia Scientiarum , 8 (1998): 187–201.
Tokotsugi Tokuji, ‘Kokumin yūsei hō ni tsuite’ Minzoku eisei 9, No. 1 (May 1941): 58–66.
Miwa Ryoichi, Nihon senryō no keizai seisaku shiteki kenkyū (Tōkyō: Nihon keizai hyōron sha, 2002), pp. 23–7.
CF Sams, ‘Medic’: The mission of an American military doctor in occupied Japan and wartorn Korea (New York: ME Sharpe, 1998), pp. 183–4.
Sugiyama Akiko, Senryō ki no iry ō kaikaku (Tōkyō: Keisō shobō, 1995), p. 228.
C Aldous and A Suzuki, Reforming Public Health in Occupied Japan, 1945–52: Alien prescriptions? (London: Routledge, 2012), p. 177.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Maho Toyoda
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Toyoda, M. (2015). State, Sterilization, and Reproductive Rights: Japan as Occupier and Occupied. In: de Matos, C., Caprio, M.E. (eds) Japan as the Occupier and the Occupied. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137408112_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137408112_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-68115-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40811-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)