Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in European Culture and History ((SECH))

  • 108 Accesses

Abstract

In the wake of the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the spontaneous invocation and rapid popular acceptance of this freighted term mark a specific and potent return of repressed American history. While no critic or analyst has directly confronted this return, the genealogy of the term makes clear that the civilian victims and spectacular destruction of “9/11” triggered an unconscious discursive reenactment of the problem of U.S. guilt for the 300,000, mostly noncombatant victims of the first use of nuclear weapons against the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The first use of the term by the NY Times was in a photo caption (“Ground zero: the skeleton of the World Trade Center”). In the following days, the term spread quickly to reports and commentaries. NY Times, September 16, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd edn, vol. 6 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989), pp. 879–80. The OED cites Hanson W. Baldwin, “Atom Bomb Is Proved Most Terrible Weapon,” NY Times, July 7, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See J. Samuel Walker, “The Decision to Use the Bomb: A Historiographical Update,” in Michael J. Hogan, ed., Hiroshima in History and Memory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 11–37.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Paul Boyer, “Exotic Resonances: Hiroshima in American Memory,” in Hogan, ed., Hiroshima in History and Memory, pp. 149–50. See also Boyer’s Fallout: A Historian Reflects on America’s Half-Century Encounter with Nuclear Weapons (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1998), pp. 41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Edward T. Linenthal, “Anatomy of a Controversy”; and Richard K. Kohn, “History at Risk: The Case of the Enola Gay,” both in Edward T. Linenthal and Tom Engelhardt, eds., History Wars: The Enola Gay and Other Battles for the American Past (New York: Henry Holt, 1996), pp. 9–62 and 140–70.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Robert Jay Lifton and Greg Mitchell, Hiroshima in America: A Half-Century of Denial (New York: Avon, 1995), pp. 307–13.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Christopher Hitchens, The Trial of Henry Kissinger (London: Verso, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Richard Minear, “Atomic Holocaust, Nazi Holocaust: Some Reflections,” Diplomatic History 19 (Spring 1995): 347–65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2005 Gene Ray

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ray, G. (2005). Ground Zero: Hiroshima Haunts “9/11”. In: Terror and the Sublime in Art and Critical Theory. Studies in European Culture and History. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403979445_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics