Skip to main content

Professionalization: Archaeology as an “Expert” Knowledge

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology

Introduction

Archaeology as a professionalized practice – with accredited specialists, institutional support, defined methodologies, and a coherent knowledge base – has a convoluted history. By some accounts, that history extends back no more than a half century, to the post-World War II era and, in particular, to the 1960s and 1970s. By other accounts, it stretches across multiple centuries (if not millennia), with a range of interested individuals and materials converging at various times and places in the making of archaeological expertise. Typical reviews of such disciplinary development tend to emphasize intellectual progression or the role of a select number of notable people in creating a professional archaeological environment. Iconic publications such as Trigger’s (2006) A History of Archaeological Thought and Daniel’s (1981) A Short History of Archaeologybear witness to these tendencies, compiling the rise of different modes of thinking at the hands of a series of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 5,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Browman, D. L. 2002. Frederic Ward Putnam: contributions to the development of archaeological institutions and encouragement of women practitioners, in D.L. Browman & S. Williams (ed.) New perspectives on the origins of Americanist archaeology: 209-41. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E.S. 2010. Enactments of expertise. Annual Review of Anthropology 39: 17-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christenson, A.L. 2011. Who were the professional North American archaeologists of 1900? Clues from the work of Warren K. Moorehead. Bulletin of the History of Archaeology 21: 4-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Andreu, M. 2007. A world history of nineteenth-century archaeology: nationalism, colonialism, and the past. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerick, K. 2003. From frozen monuments to fluid landscapes: the conservation and presentation of ancient monuments from 1882 to the present. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosden, C. & F. Larson. 2007. Knowing things: exploring the collections at the Pitt Rivers Museum 1884-1945. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinsley, C.M. 1999. Frederic Ward Putnam, in T. Murray (ed.) Encyclopedia of archaeology, part 1: the great archaeologists. 2:141-74. Santa Barbara: ABC-Clio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaeser, M.-A. 2006. The first establishment of prehistoric science: the shortcomings of autonomy, in J. Callmer, M. Meyer, R. Struwe & C. Theune (ed.) The beginnings of academic pre- and protohistoric archaeology (1890-1930) in a European perspective: 149-60. Stellerloh: Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, M.S. 1977. The rise of professionalism: a sociological analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozny, L.R. (ed.) 2011. Comparative archaeologies: a sociological view of the science of the past. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, G. 2001. Critical approaches to fieldwork: contemporary and historical archaeological practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • - 2012. Understanding the archaeological record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, S. 1995. Archaeology and its disciplinary culture: the professionalisation of Australian prehistoric archaeology. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • - 2013. Making expert knowledge through the image: connections between antiquarian and early modern scientific illustration. Isis: In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, T.C. 1999. The political economy of archaeology in the United States. Annual Review of Anthropology 28: 155-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, S. 1990. Archaeological curatorship. London: Leicester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • - (ed.) 2007. Visions of antiquity: the Society of Antiquaries of London 1707-2007. London: Society of Antiquaries of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S.E. 2011. The archaeological eye: visualisation and the institutionalisation of academic archaeology in London. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Southampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskams, S. 2001. Excavation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnapp, A. 2002. Between antiquarians and archaeologists--continuities and ruptures. Antiquity 76: 134-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P.J. 2009. Asplendid idiosyncrasy’: prehistory at Cambridge 1915-50 (British Archaeological Reports British series 485). Oxford: Archaeopress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweet, R. 2004. Antiquaries: the discovery of the past in eighteenth-century Britain. London: Hambledon and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B.G. 2006. A history of archaeological thought, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Adadia, O.M. 2010. Beyond externalism. Exploring new directions in the history of archaeology. Archaeological Dialogues 17: 215-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, C.S. 2011. Some notable British excavations before 1900, in J. Schofield (ed.) Great excavations: shaping the archaeological profession: 12-24. Oxford: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, W. 1989. The organizational context in the history of archaeology: Pitt Rivers and other British archaeologists in the 1860s. Antiquaries Journal 69: 23-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chester, H.L. 2002. Frances Eliza Babbitt and the growth of professionalism of women in archaeology, in D.L. Browman & S. Williams (ed.) New perspectives on the origins of Americanist archaeology: 164-84. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. & T. Yarrow. 2012. The age of innocence: personal histories of the 1960s digging circuit in Britain. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 16: 300-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, G. 1981. A short history of archaeology. London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskildsen, K.R. 2012. The language of objects: Christian Jürgensen Thomsen’s science of the past. Isis 103: 24-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. 1994. Professional vision. American Anthropologist 96: 606-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gräslund, B. 2006. Academic archaeology in Sweden up to 1930, in J. Callmer, M. Meyer, R. Struwe & C. Theune (ed.) The beginnings of academic pre- and protohistoric archaeology (1890-1930) in a European perspective: 179-84. Stellerloh: Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtorf, C. 2007. An archaeological fashion show: how archaeologists dress and how they are portrayed in the media, in T. Clack & M. Brittain (ed.) Archaeology and the media: 69-88. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, K. 1981. A social history of archaeology: the British experience. London: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaeser, M.-A. 2002. On the international roots of prehistory. Antiquity 76: 170-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, S. 2007. On disciplinary culture: archaeology as fieldwork and its gendered associations. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 14: 235-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickstone, J.V. 2000. Ways of knowing: a new history of science, technology and medicine. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlanger, N. 2003. The Burkitt affair revisited. Colonial implications and identity politics in early South African prehistory research. Archaeological Dialogues 10: 5-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, J. 2012. The best degree? Current Archaeology 270: 48-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheperd, N. 2003. State of the discipline: science, culture and identity in South African archaeology, 1870-2003. Journal of Southern African Studies 29: 823-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soffer, R.N. 1982. Why do disciplines fail? The strange case of British sociology. English Historical Review 97: 767-802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speight, S. 2002. Digging for history: archaeological fieldwork and the adult student 1943-1975. Studies in the Education of Adults 30: 68-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. 1995. Professionals and the knowledge of archaeology. British Journal of Sociology 46: 499-508.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Perry .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Perry, S. (2014). Professionalization: Archaeology as an “Expert” Knowledge. In: Smith, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1002

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1002

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0426-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0465-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics