Skip to main content

Empathy and Offending

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice
  • 383 Accesses

Overview

Empathy is an individual difference that has been theoretically linked with an increased likelihood of offending, particularly serious offending. In contrast to the strong theoretical relationship, however, the empirical evidence of the relationship between empathy and offending is lacking. This is problematic as many offender treatment programs are designed to address this supposed “lack of empathy.” In order to further knowledge about empathy and offending, the measurement of empathy should be improved and studies should attempt to use more sensitive measures of offending (e.g., self-reports). Prospective longitudinal studies are needed to establish whether a lack of empathy is a correlate, a risk factor, or a causal risk factor for offending. Only if empathy is the latter would empathy enhancement be expected to reduce the likelihood of future offending.

Introduction

Empathy is an elusive construct, and as a result, clarifying its association with offending has challenged...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 4,350.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 4,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading and References

  • Albeiro P, Matricardi G, Speltri D, Toso D (2009) The assessment of empathy in adolescence: a contribution to the validation of the Italian version of the basic empathy scale. J Adolesc 32:393–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport GW (1985) The historical background of social psychology. In: Lindzey G, Aronson E (eds) Handbook of social psychology. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair RJR (2007) Empathy dysfunction in psychopathic individuals. In: Farrow T (ed) Empathy in mental illness. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cale EM (2006) A quantitative review of the relations between the “Big 3” higher order personality dimensions and antisocial behaviour. J Res Personal 40:250–284

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ambrosio F, Oliver M, Didon D, Besche C (2009) The basic empathy scale: a French validation of a measure of empathy in youth. Personal Individ Diff 46:160–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis MH (1983) Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 44:113–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg N, Fabes RA (1990) Empathy: conceptualization, measurement, and relation to prosocial behavior. Motiv Emot 14:131–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg N, Strayer J (1987) Critical issues in the study of empathy. In: Eisenberg N, Strayer J (eds) Empathy and its development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis L, Walsh A (1999) Criminologists’ opinions about causes and theories of crime and delinquency. Criminologist 24:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis L, Cooper JA, Walsh A (2008) Criminologists’ opinions about causes and theories of crime and delinquency. Criminologist 33:23–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington DP (2003) Key results from the first 40 years of the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. In: Thornberry TP, Krohn MD (eds) Taking stock of delinquency: an overview of findings from contemporary longitudinal studies. Kluwer/Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Feshbach ND (1975) Empathy in children: some theoretical and empirical considerations. Counsel Psychol 5:25–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Feshbach ND (1987) Parental empathy and child adjustment/maladjustment. In: Eisenberg N, Strayer J (eds) Empathy and its development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher D, Beech A, Browne K (1999) Comparison of sex offenders to nonoffenders on selected psychological measures. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 43:473–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein H, Higgins-D’Allessandro A (2001) Empathy and attachment in relation to violent vs. nonviolent offense history among jail inmates. J Offender Rehabil 32:31–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson MR, Hirschi T (1990) A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson KR (2003) Empathy deficits of sexual offenders: a conceptual model. J Sex Aggress 9:13–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashino DS, Wurtele SK, Klebe KJ (1995) Child molesters: an examination of cognitive factors. J Interpers Violence 10:106–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman ML (2000) Empathy and moral development: implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan R (1969) Development of an empathy scale. J Consult Clin Psychol 33:307–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe D, Farrington DP (2004) Empathy and offending: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggress Viol Behav 9:441–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe D, Farrington DP (2006) The development and validation of the basic empathy scale. J Adolesc 29:589–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe D, Farrington DP (2007) The relationship between low empathy and self-reported offending. Legal Criminol Psychol 12:265–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe D, Farrington DP (2011) Is low empathy related to bullying controlling for other factors? J Adolesc 34:59–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe D, Murray J, Farrington DP, Vanneck C (2012) Testing the Cambridge Quality Checklists on a review of disrupted families and crime. Crim Behav Mental Health 22:303-314

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer HC, Lowe KK, Kupfer DJ (2005) To your health: how to understand what research tells us about risk. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeber Rl, Farrington DP, Stouthamer-Loeber M, White HR (2008) Violence and Serious Theft: Development and Prediction from Childhood to Adulthood. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall WL, Marshall LE, Serran GA, O’Brien D (2009) Self-esteem, shame, cognitive distortions and empathy in sexual offenders. Psychol Crime Law 15:217–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian A, Epstein N (1972) A measure of emotional empathy. J Pers 40:525–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray J, Farrington DP, Eisner MP (2009) Drawing conclusions about causes from systematic reviews of risk factors: The Cambridge Quality Checklists. J Exp Criminol 5:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirtcliff EA, Vitacco MJ, Graf AR, Gostisha AJ, Merz JL, Zahn-Waxler C (2009) Neurobiology of empathy and callousness: implications for the development of antisocial behavior. Behav Sci Law 27:137–171

    Google Scholar 

  • White JL, Moffitt TE, Bartusch A, Caspi JD, Needles DJ, Stouthamer-Loeber M (1994) Measuring impulsivity and examining its relationship to delinquency. J Abnorm Psychol 103:192–205

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darrick Jolliffe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Jolliffe, D. (2014). Empathy and Offending. In: Bruinsma, G., Weisburd, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_508

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_508

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5689-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5690-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics