Skip to main content

Complex (Jung)

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Introduction

A complex is an unconscious organized set of memories, associations, fantasies, expectations, and behavior patterns or tendencies around a core element which is accompanied by strong emotions. It is derived from early developmental experiences which have a problematic or even traumatic character circling around unresolved needs and topics. The complex can be triggered in later life by structurally similar cues, e.g., situations or relationships. In this case, the complex takes hold of the person or better to say of the ego; this is accompanied by strong emotions and typical behavior patterns influenced by the complex. Complexes can also be described as personality parts which, as an organized entity, have a certain autonomy from the ego as the center of the personality. When the complex is at work, it has a strong impact on the state of mind and the person, under its control, feels and behaves differently, e.g., strongly irrational, compared to his or her normal and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research and clinical implications. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G. (1992). Experimental researches (Collected works, Vol. 2). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, E. R. (2008). Principles of neural science (5th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kast, V. (1992). The dynamics of symbols: Fundamentals of Jungian psychology. New York: Fromm International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehyayan, A., Best, K., Schmeing, J. B., Axmacher, N., & Kessler, H. (2013). Neural activity during free association to conflict–related sentences. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 705. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00705.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Noll, R. (1989). Multiple personality, dissociation, and C.G. Jung’s complex theory. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 34, 353–370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petchkovsky, L., Petchkovsky, M., Morris, P., Dickson, P., Montgomery, D., Dwyer, J., Burnett, P., & Strudwick, M. (2011). The fMRI correlates of psychological “complexes”: Exploring the neurobiology of internal conflict. Journal of US-China Medical Science, 8(11), 647–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Y. W., Lee, J. S., Han, O. S., & Rhi, B. Y. (2005). The influence of complexes on implicit learning. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 50, 175–190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, T., & Kimbles, J. (2004). Emerging theory of cultural complexes. In J. Cambray & L. Carter (Eds.), Analytical psychology: Contemporary perspectives in Jungian psychology. Brunner-Routledge: Hove/New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Roesler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Roesler, C. (2017). Complex (Jung). In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_575-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_575-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics