Abstract
This chapter examines the trajectory of the academic integrity movement in the USA, beginning with the early conceptions of academic integrity, based on British higher education models in which ethical and moral lessons were explicitly addressed via specific, denominational religious teachings and compulsory practices that informed the earliest US institutions, and then tracing the development of the uniquely American approaches. Key factors in this development were the increasingly diverse demographics of students as well as the influence of education reformers who pressed for expanding access to higher education, which led to many students arriving at university with an incomplete understanding of the ethical expectations they would face. Additionally, American ideals that place emphasis on individual responsibility and control have led to practices such as honor codes and pledges. The discourse, framing, and descriptive metaphors of academic integrity as moral, legal, and medical issues as well as the shortcomings inherent in these frameworks are noted. Present-day academic integrity controversies are discussed, especially the extent to which academic integrity is exclusively or primarily a matter of individual choice or might instead be better addressed in terms of cultural expectations or systemic issues. A short history of the role of the International Center for Academic Integrity established in 1992 in response to concerns about student cheating is included. The chapter concludes by suggesting that narrow focus on student cheating is insufficient and that what is needed, instead, is a much broader approach to the development of integrity not only for students but for educators, researchers, educational practices, institutions, and cultures.
References
Ariely, D. (2014, December 1). The encyclopedia of ethical failure. Dan Ariely [web log]. Retrieved from http://danariely.com/tag/cheating/.
Arum, R. A., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Barnes, E. (1904). Student honor: A study in cheating. International Journal of Ethics, 14(4), 481–488. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2376257.
Berlin, J. A. (1984). Writing instruction in nineteenth-century American colleges. Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Bertram Gallant, T. (2011). Introduction. In T. Bertram Gallant (Ed.), Creating the ethical academy (pp. 3–11). New York: Routledge.
Biagioli, M. (2014). Plagiarism, kinship and slavery. Theory Culture and Society, 31(2/3), 65–91.
Bluedorn, H. (1997). A few words about the sin of plagiarism. Trivium Pursuit. Retrieved from www.triviumpursuit.com/articles/plagiarism.php
Blum, S. D. (2008, November 6). Academic integrity and student plagiarism: A question of education, not ethics. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved September 12, 2014, from http://chronicle.com/article/Academic-IntegrityStudent/32323.
Boffey, P. M. (1957, June 13). Jacob finds that college may not influence values. The Harvard Crimson.
Bowdon, D. (1996). Coming to terms: Plagiarism. The English Journal, 85(4), 82–84.
Brubacher, J. S. (2004). Higher education in transition: A history of American colleges and universities. Brunswick: Harper and Row.
Cheating by college girls. (1927). The Science News Letter, 12(338), 219–220.
Dennis, C. M. (1948). Shop talk. Music Educators Journal, 34(4), 19.
DeVoss, D., & Rosati, A. C. (2002). It wasn’t me, was it? Plagiarism and the web. Computers and Composition, 19, 191–203.
Drake, C. A. (1941). Why students cheat. The Journal of Higher Education, 12(8), 418–420. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1976003.
Drayer, A. M. (1970). The teacher in a democratic society. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.
East, J. (2010). Judging plagiarism: A problem of morality and convention. Higher Education, 59(1), 69–83.
Eaton, J. S. (2014, October 5). An overview of U.S. accreditation. Retrieved from ERIC Institute of Education Sciences: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED544355.pdf
El-Kawas, E. (1998). Accreditation’s role in quality assurance in the United States. Journal of Higher Education Management, 10, 42–56.
Ellison, J. (1960). American disgrace: College cheating. The Saturday Evening Post, 232(28), 13.
Fishman, T. (2009). ‘We know it when we see it’ is not good enough: Toward a standard definition of plagiarism that transcends theft, fraud and copyright. In 4th Asia Pacific conference on educational integrity: Creating an inclusive approach, University of Wollongong, 28–39 Sept. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/apcei/09/papers/37/.
Grossberg, M. (2011). History and the disciplining of plagiarism. In C. Eisner & M. Vicinus (Eds.), Originality, imitation, and plagiarism; teaching writing in the digital age (pp. 159–172). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Haines, V. J., Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E., & Clark, R. E. (1986). College cheating: Immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude. Research in Higher Education, 25(4), 342–352.
Hendricks, E., Young-Jones, A., & Foutch, J. (2011). To cheat or not to cheat. Logos, 4, 68–75.
Howard, R. M. (1993). A plagiarism pentimento. Journal of Teaching Writing, 11, 233–245.
Howard, R. M. (2000). Sexuality, textuality: The cultural work of plagiarism. College English, 62(4), 473–491. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/378866.
Howard, R. M. (2010). The scholarship of plagiarism: Where we’ve been, where we are, what’s needed next. Retrieved August 10, 2014, from Council of Writing Program Administrators: http://www.wpacouncil.org/archives/33n3/33n3howard-watson.pdf
International Centre for Academic Integrity (ICAI). (n.d.). History: 1992. Retrieved August 22, 2014, from AcademicIntegrity.org: http://www.academicintegrity.org/icai/about-3.php
Jacob, P. E. (1957). Changing values in college: An exploratory study of the impact of college teaching. New York: Harper and Row.
Key Supreme Court Cases: Dartmouth College v. Woodward (17 U. S. 518, 1819). (2014). Retrieved from American Bar Association http://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/initiatives_awards/students_in_action/dartmouth.html
Kincaid, J. (1997, January 20). Purloined letters. The New Yorker 93–97.
Kroll, B. M. (1988). How college freshmen view plagiarism. Written Communication, 5, 203–221.
Lang, J. M. (2013). Cheating lessons: Learning from dishonesty. Cambridge: Harvard College.
Laser, M. (2008). To cheat or not to cheat. The Christian Science Monitor, 9.
Malloch, A. E. (1976). A dialogue on plagiarism. College English, 38(2), 165–174.
Mallon, T. (1989). Stolen words: Forays into the origins and ravages of plagiarism. New York: Ticknor.
McCabe, D. T. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics and Behavior, 11, 219–232.
McCabe, D., & Pavela, G. (2004). Ten (updated) principles of academic integrity. Change, 36(3), 10–15. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40177967.
McCalister, C., & Watkins, P. J. (2012). Increasing academic integrity in online classes by fostering the development of self-regulated learning skills. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies Issues and Ideas, 85(3), 96–101.
McCleod, S. H. (1992). Responding to plagiarism: The role of the WPA. Writing Program Administration, 15, 7–16.
McKowan, H. C. (1950). What would you have done? Saturday Evening Post, 222(48), 110.
Penister, A. O. (1958). Changing values in college: An exploratory study of the impact of college teaching by Philip E. Jacob. The School Review, 238–244. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1083551
Rankin, E. (1994). Seeing yourself as a teacher: Conversations with five new teachers in a university writing program. Urbana: NCTE.
Rettinger, D., & Kramer, Y. (2009). Situational and personal causes of student cheating. Research in Higher Education, 50(3), 873–890.
Robillard, A. (2009). Pass it on. Revising the “plagiarism as theft” metaphor. JAC, 29(1/2), 405–435. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20866905.
Spellmeyer, K. (1994). On conventions and collaboration: The open road and the iron cage. In J. C. Schilb (Ed.), Writing theory and critical theory (pp. 73–95). New York: MLA.
TED: The Economics Daily. (2014, September 26). Retrieved from United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2014/ted_20140508.htm
Trow, M. (1996, June 12). Trust, markets, and accountability in Higher Education: A comparative perspective. Retrieved September 27, 2014, from Center for Studies in Higher Education: http://www.cshe.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/shared/publications/docs/ROP.Trow.Trust.1.96.pdf
Valentine, K. (2006). Plagiarism as literary practice: Recognizing and rethinking ethical binaries. College Composition and Communication, 58(1), 89–109. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20456924.
Velduis, N. (2000). Sumerian proverbs in their curricular context. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 120(3), 383.
Zwagerman, S. (2008). The Scarlet P: Plagiarism, panopticism, and the rhetoric of academic integrity. College Composition and Communication, 59(4), 676–710. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20457030.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this entry
Cite this entry
Fishman, T.‘. (2015). Academic Integrity as an Educational Concept, Concern and Movement in US Institutions of Higher Learning. In: Bretag, T. (eds) Handbook of Academic Integrity. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_1-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_1-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-079-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Academic Integrity as an Educational Concept, Concern and Movement in US Institutions of Higher Learning- Published:
- 02 November 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_1-2
-
Original
Academic Integrity as an Educational Concept, Concern and Movement in US Institutions of Higher Learning- Published:
- 29 June 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_1-1