Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

78/w mit Rezidiv-Genitalprolaps zur vaginalen Netzeinlage

Vorbereitung auf die Facharztprüfung: Fall 41

78/f with recurrent genital prolapse to vaginal mesh insertion

Preparation for the medical specialist examination: part 41

  • Facharzt-Training
  • Published:
Der Gynäkologe Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4

Literatur

  1. Baessler K, Aigmüller T, Albrich S et al (2016) Diagnosis and therapy of female pelvic organ prolapse. Guideline of the DGGG, SGGG and OEGGG (S2e-level, AWMF registry number 015/006, April 2016). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 76(12):1287–1301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. de Albuquerque Coelho SC, de Castro EB, Juliato CR (2016) Female pelvic organ prolapse using pessaries: systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 27(12):1797–1803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K et al (2013) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD4014. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Costantini E, Brubaker L, Cervigni M et al (2016) Sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: evidence-based review and recommendations. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 205:60–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Meriwether KV, Balk EM, Antosh DD et al (2019) Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines. Int Urogynecol J 30(4):505–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Morgan DM, Rogers MA, Huebner M et al (2007) Heterogeneity in anatomic outcome of sacrospinous ligament fixation for prolapse: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 109(6):1424–1433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K et al (2016) Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD12079

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Naumann G, Hüsch T, Mörgeli C et al (2020) Mesh-augmented transvaginal repair of recurrent or complex anterior pelvic organ prolapse in accordance with the SCENIHR opinion. Int Urogynecol J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04525-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wong V, Shek KL, Goh J et al (2014) Cystocele recurrence after anterior colporrhaphy with and without mesh use. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 172:131–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE et al (2011) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) & grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Int Urogynecol J 22(1):3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hampel C (2017) Implantate bei Genitalprolaps. Urologe 56:1583–1590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-017-0525-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Naumann G (2019) Diagnose und Therapie des Genitaldeszensus. Gynäkologe 52:851–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-019-04508-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Erfurt, Nordhäuser Str. 74, 99089, Erfurt, Deutschland

    Gert Naumann

Authors
  1. Gert Naumann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gert Naumann.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

G. Naumann gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien. Für Bildmaterial oder anderweitige Angaben innerhalb des Manuskripts, über die Patienten zu identifizieren sind, liegt von ihnen und/oder ihren gesetzlichen Vertretern eine schriftliche Einwilligung vor.

The supplement containing this article is not sponsored by industry.

Additional information

Redaktion

K. Diedrich, Hamburg

M. Friedrich, Krefeld

U. Gembruch, Bonn

W. Jonat, Kiel

A. Rody, Lübeck

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naumann, G. 78/w mit Rezidiv-Genitalprolaps zur vaginalen Netzeinlage. Gynäkologe 54 (Suppl 1), 73–77 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-021-04758-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-021-04758-9

Schlüsselwörter

Search

Navigation