Abstract
There is a lack of reliable and valid measurement tools to assess neck function in infants with congenital muscular torticollis, and most physiotherapists use visual estimation, which has not been adequately tested for reliability in this population. We examined the reliability of visual estimation of head tilt and active neck rotation in the upright position, on infants with congenital muscular torticollis by physiotherapists. We recruited 31 infants and 26 physiotherapists. Therapists rated videos of infants’ head position in the frontal plane (tilt) and transverse plane (active rotation) using visual estimation, on two occasions at least one week apart. Overall, inter-rater reliability was good (mean ICC, 0.68 ± 0.20; mean SEM, 5.1° ± 2.1°). Rotation videos had better reliability (mean ICC, 0.79 ± 0.14) than head tilt videos (mean ICC, 0.58 ± 0.20). Intra-rater reliability was excellent (mean ICC, 0.85 ± 0.08). Both head tilt and rotation had excellent reliability (mean ICC, 0.84 ± 0.08 for head tilt and 0.85 ± 0.09 for rotation). There was no correlation between intra-rater reliability and clinical experience.
Conclusion Visual estimation had excellent intra-rater reliability in the assessment of neck active rotation and head tilt on infants with congenital muscular torticollis. Visual estimation had acceptable inter-rater reliability in the assessment of neck active rotation but not of head tilt. There was a wide variation in reliability with no correlation between reliability and clinical experience. Assessment tools for head tilt that are more psychometrically robust should be developed.
What is Known: | |
• A thorough assessment of infants presenting with torticollis is essential, using assessment tools with robust psychometric properties | |
• Visual estimation is the most commonly used method of assessment of neck function in infants with torticollis | |
What is New: | |
• Visual estimation had excellent intra-rater reliability in the assessment of neck active rotation and head tilt in the upright position in videos of infants and acceptable inter-rater reliability in the assessment of rotation but not of head tilt | |
• Physiotherapists’ clinical experience had minimal relationship with reliability |
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- CMT:
-
Congenital muscular torticollis
- CSp:
-
Cervical spine
- ICC:
-
Intraclass correlation coefficient
- ROM:
-
Range of motion
- Rot :
-
Rotation
- SCM :
-
Sternocleidomastoid muscle
- SEM:
-
Standard error of measurement
- SD:
-
Standard deviation
- SF:
-
Side-flexion
- VE:
-
Visual estimation
- VLE:
-
Virtual learning environment
References
Cooperman D (1997) The differential diagnosis of torticollis in children. Phys Occup Ther Paediatr 17:1–11
Nucci P, Kushner BJ, Seragino M (2005) A multi-disciplinary study of the ocular, orthopaedic and neurological causes of abnormal head postures. Am J Opthalmol 140:65–68
Herman MJ (2006) Torticollis in infants and children: common and unusual causes. Instr Course Lect 55:647–653
Cheng J, Tang S, Chen TMK, Wong E (2000) The clinical presentation and outcome of treatment of congenital muscular torticollis in infants—1086 cases. J Ped Surg 35:1091–1096
Kaplan S, Coulter C, Sargent B (2018) Physical therapy management of congenital muscular torticollis: a 2018 evidence-based clinical practice guideline. Pediatr Phys Ther 30:240–290
van Vlimmeren LA, Helders PJ, van Adrichem LN, Engelbert RH (2004) Diagnostic strategies for the evaluation of asymmetry in infancy—a review. Eur J Pediatr 163:185–191
van Vlimmeren LA, Helders PJ, van Adrichem LN, Engelbert RH (2006) Torticollis and plagiocephaly in infancy: therapeutic strategies. Pediatr Rehabil 9:40–46
Aarnivala HE, Valkama AM, Pirttiniemi PM (2014) Cranial shape, size and cervical motion in normal new-borns. Early Hum Dev 90:425–430
de Chalain TM, Park S (2005) Torticollis associated with positional plagiocephaly: a growing epidemic. J Craniofac Surg 16:411–418
Cheng JC, Au AW (1994) Infantile torticollis: a review of 624 cases. J Ped Orthop 14:802–808
Chen MM, Chang HC, Hsieh CF, Yen MF, Chen TH (2005) Predictive model for congenital muscular torticollis: analysis of 1021 infants with sonography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:2199–2203
Stellwagen L, Hubbard E (2008) Torticollis, facial asymmetry and plagiocephaly in normal new-borns. Arch Dis Child 93:827–831
Hylton N (1997) Infants with torticollis: the relationship between asymmetric head and neck positioning and postural development. Phys Occ Ther Ped 17:91–117
Yu C, Wong F, Lo L, Chen Y (2004) Cranio-facial deformities in patients with uncorrected congenital muscular torticollis—an assessment from 3D imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:24–33
Tessner A, Mooney P, Pellard L (2010) A developmental perspective on congenital muscular torticollis: a critical appraisal of the evidence. Pediatr Phys Ther 22:378–383
Öhman AM (2009) Are infants with torticollis at risk of a delay in early motor milestones compared with a control group of healthy infants? Dev Med Child Neurol 51:545–550
Schertz M, Luk L, Green D (2013) Long term neurodevelopmental follow up of children with congenital muscular torticollis. J Child Neurol 28:1215–1221
Kiwak KJ (1984) Establishing an etiology for torticollis. Postgrad Med 75:126–134
Nuysink J, van Haastert IC, Takken T, Helders P (2008) Symptomatic asymmetry in the first six months of life: differential diagnosis. Eur J Pediatr 167:613–619
Antonaci F, Ghirmai S, Bono G, Nappi G (2000) Current methods for cervical spine movement evaluation: a review. Clin Exp Rheumatol 18:S-45
Fortin C, Ehrmann Feldman D, Cheriet F, Labelle H (2011) Clinical methods for quantifying body segment posture: a literature review. Disabil Rehabil 33:367–383
Schaufele MK, Boden SD (2003) Physical function measurements in neck pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 14:569–588
Youdas JW, Carey JR, Garrett TR (1991) Reliability of measurements of cervical spine range of motion—comparison of three methods. Phys Ther 71:98–104
Jordan K (2000) Assessment of published reliability studies for cervical spine range-of-motion measurement tools. J Manip Physiol Ther 23:180–195
de Koning CH, van den Heuvel SP, Staal JB, Smits-Engelsman BC, Hendriks EJ (2008) Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 17:905–921
Whitcroft KL, Massouh L, Amirfeyz R, Bannister G (2010) Comparison of methods of measuring active cervical range of motion. Spine 35:E976–E980
Tyson S (2003) A systematic review of methods to measure posture. Phys Ther Rev 8:45–50
Hald ES, Hertle RW, Yang D (2011) Application of a digital head-posture measuring system in children. Am J Ophthalmol 151:66–70
Arbogast KB, Gholve PA, Friedman JE, Maltese MR, Tomasello MF, Dormans JP (2007) Normal cervical spine range of motion in children 3–12 years old. Spine 32:E309–E315
Lewandowski J, Szulc P (2003) The range of motion of the cervical spine in children aged from 3 to 7 years-an electrogoniometric study. Folia Morphol 62:459–461
Lynch-Caris T, Majeske KD, Brelin-Fornari J, Nashi S (2008) Establishing reference values for cervical spine range of motion in pre-pubescent children. J Biomech 41:2714–2719
Feipel V, Rondelet B, Le Pallec JP, Rooze M (1999) Normal global motion of the cervical spine: an electrogoniometric study. Clin Biomech 14:462–470
Sforza C, Grassi G, Fragnito N, Turci M, Ferrario VF (2002) Three-dimensional analysis of active head and cervical spine range of motion: effect of age in healthy male subjects. Clin Biomech 17:611–614
Rubio AS, Griffet JR, Caci H, Bérard E, El Hayek T, Boutté P (2009) The moulded baby syndrome: incidence and risk factors regarding 1,001 neonates. Eur Journal Ped 168:605–611
Petronic I, Brdar R, Cirovic D, Nikolic D, Lukac M, Janic D, Pavicevic P, Golubovic Z, Knezevic T (2010) Congenital muscular torticollis in children: distribution, treatment duration and outcome. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 46:153–158
Captier G, Dessauge D, Picot MC, Bigorre M, Gossard C, El Ammar J, Leboucq N (2011) Classification and pathogenic models of unintentional postural cranial deformities in infants: plagiocephalies and brachycephalies. J Craniofac Surg 22:33–41
Lee YT, Yoon K, Kim YB, Chung PW, Hwang JH, Park YS, Han BH (2011) Clinical features and outcome of physiotherapy in early presenting congenital muscular torticollis with severe fibrosis on ultrasonography: a prospective study. J Pediatr Surg 46:1526–1531
Lee JY, Koh SE, Lee IS, Jung H, Lee J, Kang JI, Bang H (2013) The cervical range of motion as a factor affecting outcome in patients with congenital muscular torticollis. Ann Rehab Med 37:183–190
Jung AY, Kang EY, Lee SH, Nam DH, Cheon JH, Kim HJ (2015) Factors that affect the rehabilitation duration in patients with congenital muscular torticollis. Ann Rehab Med 39:18–24
Oleszek JL, Chang N, Apkon SD, Wilson PE (2005) Botulinum toxin type a in the treatment of children with congenital muscular torticollis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 84:813–816
Lal S, Abbasi AS, Jamro S (2011) Response of primary torticollis to physiotherapy. J Surg Pak (Intl) 16:153–156
Aarnivala H, Vuollo V, Harila V, Heikkinen T, Pirttiniemi P, Holmström L, Valkama AM (2016) The course of positional cranial deformation from 3 to 12 months of age and associated risk factors: a follow-up with 3D imaging. Eur J Pediatr 175:1893–1903
Laughlin J, Luerssen TG, Dias MS (2011) Prevention and management of positional skull deformities in infants. Pediatrics 128:1236–1241
Rogers GF, Oh AK, Mulliken JB (2009) The role of congenital muscular torticollis in the development of deformational plagiocephaly. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:643–652
Persing J, James H, Swanson J, Kattwinkel J (2003) Prevention and management of positional skull deformities in infants. Pediatrics 112:199–202
Emery C (1994) The determinants of treatment duration for congenital muscular torticollis. Phys Ther 74:921–928
Zachman ZJ, Traina AD, Keating JJ, Bolles ST, Braun-Porter L (1989) Inter-examiner reliability and concurrent validity of two instruments for the measurement of cervical ranges of motion. J Manip Physiol Ther 12:205–210
Van Genderen FR, De Bie RA, Helders PJ, Van Metteren LA (2003) Reliability research: towards a more clinically relevant approach. Phys Ther Rev 8:169–176
Seager A, French H, Meldrum D (2019) Measurement properties of instruments for assessment of cervical spine function in infants with torticollis: a systematic review. Eur J Pediatr 18:1–5
Chen TMK (1995) Infantile muscular torticollis: efficacy of conservative treatment with active programme and manual stretching. Chapter 4: pilot study on the measurement of passive rotation of the neck. Master of Philosophy Dissertation, Chinese University of Hong Kong (personal communication)
Klackenberg E, Elfving B, Haglund-Akerlind Y, Brogren Carlberg E (2005) Intra-rater reliability in measuring range of motion in infants with congenital muscular torticollis. Adv Physio 7:84–91
Öhman AM, Nilsson S, Beckung E (2009) Validity and reliability of muscle function scale, aimed to assess the lateral flexors of the neck in infants. Physiother Theory Pract 25:129–137
Rahlin M, Sarmiento B (2010) Reliability of still photography measuring habitual head deviation from midline in infants with congenital muscular torticollis. Pediatr Phys Ther 22:399–406
Murgia M, Venditto T, Paoloni M, Hodo B, Alcuri R, Bernetti A, Mangone M (2016) Assessing the cervical range of motion in Infants with positional plagiocephaly. J Craniofac Surg 27:1060–1064
Oledzka MM, Kaplan SL, Sweeney JK, Coulter C, Evans-Rogers DL (2018) Interrater and intrarater reliability of the congenital muscular torticollis severity classification system. Pediatr Phys Ther 30:176–182
Blonna D, Zarkadas PC, Fitzsimons JC, O’Driscoll SW (2012) Accuracy and inter-observer reliability of visual estimation compared to clinical goniometry of the elbow. Knee Surg Sport Tr A 20:1378–1385
Luxford B, Hale L, Piggott J (2009) The physiotherapy management of infants with congenital muscular torticollis: a survey of current practice in New Zealand. N Z J Physiother 37:127–135
Öhman AM, Mårdbrink EL, Orefelt C, Seager A, Tell L, Klackenberg E (2013) The physical therapy assessment and management of infants with congenital muscular torticollis: a survey and suggested assessment protocol for congenital muscular torticollis. J Nov Physiother 3:165
Seager A (2017) Assessment and management of torticollis in infancy: a survey of current physiotherapy practice. Physiother Prac Res 38:59–66
Viikari-Juntura E (1987) Inter-examiner reliability of observations in physical examinations of the neck. Phys Ther 67:1526–1532
Passier LN, Nasciemento MP, Gesch JM, Haines TP (2010) Physiotherapist observation of head and neck alignment. Physiother Theor Pr 26(6):416–423
Hoppenbrouwers M, Eckhardt MM, Verkerk K, Verhagen A (2006) Reproducibility of the measurement of active and passive cervical range of motion. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 29(5):363–367
Williams MA, McCarthy CJ, Chorti A, Cooke MW, Gates S (2010) A systematic review of reliability and validity studies of methods for measuring active and passive cervical range of motion. J Manip Physiol Ther 33(2):138–155
Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ, Hrobjartsson A, Roberts C, Shoukri M, Streiner DL (2011) Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. Int J Nurs Stud 48(6):661–671
Cocks K, Torgerson DJ (2013) Sample size calculations for pilot randomized trials: a confidence interval approach. J Clin Epidemiol 66(2):197–201
Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428
Rankin G, Stokes M (1998) Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses. Clin Rehabil 12(3):187–199
Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15(2):155–163
Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines, criteria and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6(4):284–290
Hripksak G, Heitjan DF (2002) Measuring agreement in medical informatics reliability studies. J Biomed Inform 35(2):99–110
Portney LG, Watkins MP (1993) Descriptive research. Foundations of clinical research: application to practice. Toronto, Canada: Prentice Hall Canada, pp.233-249
Boyer KK, Verma R (2000) Multiple raters in survey-based operations management research: A review and tutorial. Prod Oper Manag 9(2):128–140
Brunnekreef JJ, van Uden CJ, van Moorsel S, Kooloos JG (2005) Reliability of videotaped observational gait analysis in patients with orthopedic impairments. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 6(1):17
Chesterton LS, Sim J, Wright CC, Foster NE (2007) Interrater reliability of algometry in measuring pressure pain thresholds in healthy humans, using multiple raters. Clin J Pain 23(9):760–766
Christensen E, Castle KB, Hussey E (2015) Clinical feasibility of 2-dimensional video analysis of active cervical motion in congenital muscular torticollis. Pediatr Phys Ther 27:276–283
Barske E, Draeger D, Keck K (2014) Comparison of 2-dimensonal and 3-dimensional motion analysis to measure infant cervical range of motion. Wisconsin Physical Therapy Association, Wisconsin, USA
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2012) COSMIN checklist manual. University Medical Center, Amsterdam
Marx RG, Menezes A, Horovitz L, Jones EC, Warren RF (2003) A comparison of two-time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments. J Clin Epidemiol 56:730–735
Streiner DL, Kottner J (2014) Recommendations for reporting the results of studies of instrument and scale development and testing. J Adv Nurs 70(9):1970–1979
Eliasziw M, Young SL, Woodbury MG, Fryday-Field K (1994) Statistical methodology for the concurrent assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability: using goniometric measurements as an example. Phys Ther 74:777–788
Colaris J, van der Linden M, Selles R, Coene N, Allema JH, Verhaar J (2010) Pronation and supination after forearm fractures in children: reliability of visual estimation and conventional goniometry measurement. Injury 41:643–646
Ferenci K (2011) How reliable are measurements of limb movement joints? A comparison of estimates and gomiometry. Zeitschrift fur Physiotherapeuten 63:618
Somers DL, Hanson JA, Kedzierski CM, Nestor KL, Quinlivan KY (1997) The influence of experience on the reliability of goniometric and visual measurement of forefoot position. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 25(3):192–202
Youdas JW, Bogard CL, Suman VJ (1993) Reliability of goniometric measurements and visual estimates of ankle joint active range of motion obtained in a clinical setting. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74(10):1113–1118
Bruton A, Conway JH, Holgate ST (2000) Reliability: what is it, and how is it measured? Physiotherapy 86:94–99
Croxford P, Jones K, Barker K (1998) Inter-tester comparison between visual estimation and goniometric measurement of ankle dorsiflexion. Physiother Theor Pr. 14(2):107–113
Rachkidi R, Ghanem I, Kalouche I, El Hage S, Dagher F, Kharrat K (2009) Is visual estimation of passive range of motion in the pediatric lower limb valid and reliable? BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10:126
Bennell K, Talbot R, Wajswelner H, Techovanich W, Kelly D, Hall AJ (1998) Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a weight-bearing lunge measure of ankle dorsiflexion. Aust J Physiother 44(3):175–180
Bruton A, Ellis B, Goddard J (1999) Comparison of visual estimation and goniometry for assessment of metacarpophalangeal joint angle. Physiotherapy 85(4):201–208
Wong CK (2014) Interrater reliability of the Berg Balance Scale when used by clinicians of various experience levels to assess people with lower limb amputations. Phys Ther 94(3):371–378
Lecluse N (2004) Visual estimation of joint angles in paediatrics rehabilitation medicine: not a good alternative for goniometry. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Fysiotherapie 114:19–23
Funding
This study received funding from the Temple Street Foundation, Dublin 1, Ireland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by AS; AS drafted the manuscript; All authors contributed to the manuscript and approved the final version for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval was granted by the Children’s Health Ireland at Temple Street and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Research Ethics Committees.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all participating physiotherapists and parents/guardians of infants included in the study. Permission to publish was obtained from the parents of the infant illustrated in Fig. 1.
Additional information
Communicated by Gregorio Paolo Milani
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seager, A., Meldrum, D., Conroy, R. et al. Congenital muscular torticollis: the reliability of visual estimation in the assessment of cervical spine active rotation and head tilt by physiotherapists and the impact of clinical experience. Eur J Pediatr 179, 1823–1832 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03691-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03691-8