Abstract
In the industrial world, the agar diffusion test is a standard procedure for the susceptibility testing of bacteria isolates. Beta-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. are tested with Müller–Hinton agar supplemented with 5 % blood, a so-called blood agar. The results are interpreted using standardized tables, which only exist for this type of nutrient matrix. Because of a number difficulties, both with respect to technical issues and to manual skills, blood agar is not a feasible option in many developing countries. Beta-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. also grow on Standard Nutrient Agar 1 (StNA1). This suggests using that type of nutrient medium for running agar diffusion tests. However, there are no standardized tables that can be used for interpreting the diameters of the zones of inhibition on StNA1 1. Using the existing standardized tables for blood agar to interpret cultures on StNA1 1 would be of great benefit under such circumstances where blood agar is not available. With this in mind, we conducted comparative tests to evaluate the growth characteristics of beta-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. on StNA1 1 compared to Müller–Hinton agar supplemented with 5 % sheep blood. In this study, we were able to show that beta-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. develop similar zones of inhibition on blood agar and on StNA1 1. Therefore, it is suggested that, for the interpretation of antibiograms of beta-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. performed on StNA1 1, the standard tables for blood agar can be used.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
CIP is not recommended for treating beta-hemolytic Streptococcus spp., but in this study, we analyzed and compared the growth behavior of these bacteria, not their resistances. For this reason, we decided to check also an antibiotic not common for treating beta-hemolytic Streptococcus spp.
References
bioMérieux (2002) Product data sheet: 11378 A – DE – 2002/07. Columbia Agar + 5 % Hammelblut (COS) – REF 43041/43049
bioMérieux (2004) Product data sheet: 11677 B – DE – 2004/05. Mueller Hinton Agar + 5 % Schafblut (MHS) – REF 43321/43329
Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG (2011) Product data sheet: Standard Nutrient Agar 1 (s.s. 11/2011). http://www.carlroth.com/media/_de-de/usage/AE93.pdf
European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) (2009) Antimicrobial susceptibility testing. EUCAST disk diffusion method. Version 1.0, December 18, 2009. http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Disk_test_documents/Disk_method_description_v1.0.pdf
Jorgensen JH, Swenson JM, Tenover FC, Ferraro MJ, Hindler JA, Murray PR (1994) Development of interpretive criteria and quality control limits for broth microdilution and disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol 32(10):2448–2459
Korgenski EK, Daly JA (1998) Evaluation of the BIOMIC video reader system for determining interpretive categories of isolates on the basis of disk diffusion susceptibility results. J Clin Microbiol 36(1):302–304
Muhammad G, Hoblet KH, Bech-Nielsen S, Jackwood DL, Smith KL (1998) Reproducibility of antibiogram of bovine mammary gland staphylococci under conditions of repeated subculturing. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B 45(3):189–192
Russell FM, Biribo SSN, Selvaraj G, Oppedisano F, Warren S, Seduadua A, Mulholland EK, Carapetis JR (2006) As a bacterial culture medium, citrated sheep blood agar is a practical alternative to citrated human blood agar in laboratories of developing countries. J Clin Microbiol 44(9):3346–3351
Thorvilson J, Kohner P, Henry N, Cockerill F 3rd (1997) Comparison of agar dilution, broth dilution, disk diffusion, and the E-test for susceptibility testing of penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 16(5):391–394
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Niederstebruch, N., Sixt, D. Standard Nutrient Agar 1 as a substitute for blood-supplemented Müller–Hinton agar for antibiograms in developing countries. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 32, 237–241 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-012-1735-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-012-1735-2