Skip to main content
Log in

Interhemispheric transcallosal approach: going further based on the vascular anatomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Preserving cortical frontal bridging veins draining into the superior sagittal sinus is a factor of good neurological outcome in anterior interhemispheric transcallosal approaches, classically performed to reach intraventricular tumors. Challenging the idea that veins are utterly variable, we propose a statistical analysis of 100 selective cerebral angiographies to determine where to place the craniotomy in order to expose the most probable vein-free area. The mean distance to the first pre-coronal vein was 6.66 cm (± 1.73, 1.80 to 13.00) and to the first post-coronal vein 0.94 cm (± 0.92, 0 to 3.00) (p < 0.001). The probability of absence of bridging veins was 92.0% at 4 cm anterior to the coronal suture versus 37.5% at 1 cm and 12.5% at 2 cm posteriorly. The length of the surgical corridor (distance between the first pre-coronal and post-coronal vein) was 7.60 cm (± 1.72, 3.00 to 14.10). Overall, the ideal centering point of the craniotomy was 2.86 cm (± 1.08, − 0.65 to 6.50) ahead of the coronal suture. The mean number of veins within 6 cm behind the coronal suture was 8.47 (± 2.11, from 3 to 15) versus 0.530 (± 0.82, from 0 to 3) ahead of the coronal suture (p < 0.001). These findings support a purely pre-coronal 5 cm craniotomy for interhemispheric approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Apuzzo MLJ (1993) Brain surgery: complication avoidance and management. Churchill Livingstone

  2. Aryan HE, Ozgur BM, Jandial R, Levy ML (2006) Complications of interhemispheric transcallosal approach in children: review of 15 years experience. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 108:790–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2005.10.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brockmann C, Kunze SC, Schmiedek P, Groden C, Scharf J (2012) Variations of the superior sagittal sinus and bridging veins in human dissections and computed tomography venography. Clin Imaging 36:85–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2011.05.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenberg MS Handbook of neurosurgery

  5. Hassaneen W, Suki D, Salaskar AL, Levine NB, DeMonte F, Lang FF, McCutcheon IE, Dorai Z, Feiz-Erfan I, Wildrick DM, Sawaya R (2010) Immediate morbidity and mortality associated with transcallosal resection of tumors of the third ventricle. J Clin Neurosci 17:830–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2009.12.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hernesniemi J, Romani R, Dashti R, Albayrak BS, Savolainen S, Ramsey C, Karatas A, Lehto H, Navratil O, Niemelä M (2008) Microsurgical treatment of third ventricular colloid cysts by interhemispheric far lateral transcallosal approach-experience of 134 patients. Surg Neurol 69:447–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2007.11.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McNatt SA, Sosa IJ, Krieger MD, McComb JG (2011) Incidence of venous infarction after sacrificing middle-third superior sagittal sinus cortical bridging veins in a pediatric population: clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 7:224–228. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.11.PEDS09261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ohara K, Inoue T, Ono H, Kiyofuji S, Tamura A, Saito I (2017) Technique for rerouting a bridging vein that hinders the anterior interhemispheric approach: a technical note. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 159:1913–1918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3285-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Oka K, Rhoton AL, Barry M, Rodriguez R (1985) Microsurgical anatomy of the superficial veins of the cerebrum. Neurosurgery 17:711–748. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198511000-00003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Quiñones-Hinojosa A (2012) Schmidek and sweet operative neurosurgical techniques: indications, methods, and results: Sixth Edition. Elsevier Inc.

  11. Rhoton AL, Yamamoto I, Peace DA (1981) Microsurgery of the third ventricle: Part II. Operative approaches. Neurosurgery 8:357–373. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198103000-00007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sakaki T, Kakizaki T, Takeshima T, Miyamoto K, Tsujimoto S (1995) Importance of prevention of intravenous thrombosis and preservation of the venous collateral flow in bridging vein injury during surgery: an experimental study. Surg Neurol 44:158–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-3019(95)00160-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sampei T, Yasui N, Okudera T, Fukasawa H (1996) Anatomic study of anterior frontal cortical bridging veins with special reference to the frontopolar vein. Neurosurgery 38:971–975. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199605000-00024

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sindou M (2009) Practical handbook of neurosurgery: from leading neurosurgeons. Springer-Verlag

  15. Sindou MP, Auque J, Jouanneau E (2005) Neurosurgery and the intracranial venous system. Acta Neurochir Suppl 94:167–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-211-27911-3_27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tsutsumi K, Shiokawa Y, Sakai T, Aoki N, Kubota M, Saito I (1991) Venous infarction following the interhemispheric approach in patients with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 74:715–719. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1991.74.5.0715

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.A. performed the analysis, drafted the manuscript, and approved the final version of the manuscript.

C.A. performed the analysis, drafted the manuscript, and approved the final version of the manuscript.

D.C. critically reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.

C.L.G. critically reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.

P.B. designed the study, performed the analysis, drafted the manuscript, and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Apra.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Local committee approval.

Informed consent

Use of anonymized data, with patients’ consents

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aldea, S., Apra, C., Chauvet, D. et al. Interhemispheric transcallosal approach: going further based on the vascular anatomy. Neurosurg Rev 44, 2831–2835 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-021-01480-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-021-01480-x

Keywords

Navigation