Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does ethnic polarization stimulate or relegate trade and environmental performance? A global perspective

  • Original
  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Well-organized ethnic diversity plays a crucial role in performing quality environment and international trade. Discrimination, segregation and bigotry are escalating the pressure on world’s population and spreading prejudice, later as a consequence may lead to social exclusion. This study aims to investigate whether ethnic or religious diversity affects international trade and the environmental performance by using the data of 187-countries (including 56 high-income, 102 middle-income and 29 low-income countries) of the world. The results indicate that diversity (ethnic and religious) plays a significant positive impact on international trade and environmental performance of high- and middle-income countries and vice versa with low-income countries. This study further suggested that diversity cannot be abbreviated; however, its disastrous effects may be curtailed by providing equal opportunities and peace in society to ensure the well-being of people through cohesiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelman, I., & Morris, C. T. (1968). Performance criteria for evaluating economic development potential: An operational approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82, 260–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, B. (2009). Gender and forest conservation: The impact of women’s participation in community forest governance. Ecological Economics, 68(11), 2785–2799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlerup, P., Olsson, O., & Yanagizawa, D. (2009). Social capital vs institutions in the growth process. European Journal of Political Economy, 25(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Baqir, R., & Easterly, W. (1999). Public goods and ethnic divisions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4), 1243–1284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S., & Wacziarg, R. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic growth, 8(2), 155–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & Drazen, A. (1991). Why are stabilizations delayed? A political economy model. American Economic Review, 81(5), 1170–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & Spolaore, E. (2005). The size of nations. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & Tabellini, G. (1989). External debt, capital flight and political risk. Journal of International Economics, 27(3–4), 199–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2011). Segregation and the quality of government in a cross section of countries. The American Economic Review, 101(5), 1872–1911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. (2004). Subsidies and trade barriers. Copenhagen Consensus Challenge Paper (pp. 24–28).

  • Anderson, J. E. (2011). The gravity model. Annual Review of Economics, 3(1), 133–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. E., & Van Wincoop, E. (2004). Trade costs. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(3), 691–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annett, A. (2001). Social fractionalization, political instability, and the size of government. IMF Staff papers (pp. 561–592).

  • Asumadu-Sarkodie, S., & Owusu, P. A. (2016). The casual nexus between child mortality rate, fertility rate, GDP, household final consumption expenditure, and food production index. Cogent Economics & Finance, 4(1), 1191985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awaworyi Churchill, S., & Laryea, E. (2017). Crime and ethnic diversity: cross-country evidence. Crime & Delinquency, 0011128717732036.

  • Azam, M., Khan, A. Q., Abdullah, H. B., & Qureshi, M. E. (2016). The impact of CO2 emissions on economic growth: Evidence from selected higher CO2 emissions economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(7), 6376–6389.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H. (2001). The growth of world trade: Tariffs, transport costs, and income similarity. Journal of International Economics, 53(1), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. H., Fomby, T. B., & Carter Hill, R. (2001). Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, F. (1998). Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference. Long Grove: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basuchoudhary, A., & Reksulak, M. (2010). Reducing the impact of ethnic tensions on economic growth-economic or political institutions? Public Choice, 142(3–4), 423–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, R. H. (2000). Ethnicity and development in Africa: A reappraisal. The American Economic Review, 90(2), 131–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1957). The theory of discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrand, J. H. (1989). The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor-proportions theory in international trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bove, V., & Elia, L. (2017). Migration, diversity, and economic growth. World Development, 89, 227–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1988). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2011). The power of identity: The information age: Economy, society, and culture (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, S. (2000). International migration at the beginining of the twenty-first century: Global trends and issues. International Social Science Journal, 52(165), 269–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, S. A. (2017). Fractionalization, entrepreneurship, and the institutional environment for entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 48(3), 577–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P. (1998). The political economy of ethnicity. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P., Elbadawi, I., & Sambanis, N. (2000). How much war will we see? Estimating the likelihood and amount of war in 161 countries, 1960–1998. Unpublished mimeo, The World Bank.

  • Combes, P.-P., Lafourcade, M., & Mayer, T. (2005). The trade-creating effects of business and social networks: Evidence from France. Journal of International Economics, 66(1), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, J., & DiRienzo, C. E. (2010). Is ethnic diversity good for the environment? A cross-country analysis. The Journal of Environment & Development, 19(1), 91–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, A. V., & Haveman, J. D. (1995). The effects of US trade laws on poverty in America. Journal of Human Resources, 30, 807–825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1977). Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. The American Economic Review, 67(3), 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W., & Levine, R. (1997). Africa’s growth tragedy: Policies and ethnic divisions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1203–1250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W., Ritzen, J., & Woolcock, M. (2006). Social cohesion, institutions, and growth. Economics and Politics, 18(2), 103–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egger, P. H., Von Ehrlich, M., & Nelson, D. R. (2012). Migration and trade. The World Economy, 35(2), 216–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbadawi, E., & Sambanis, N. (2000). Why are there so many civil wars in Africa? Understanding and preventing violent conflict. Journal of African Economies, 9(3), 244–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esty, D. C. (2008). Rethinking global environmental governance to deal with climate change: The multiple logics of global collective action. American Economic Review, 98(2), 116–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferri, G., & Serlenga, L. (2006). Ethnic diversity and trade.

  • Foa, R. R., & Tanner, J. J. (2012). Methodology of the indices of social development (No. 2012-04).

  • Fukuyama, F. (2001). Social capital, civil society and development. Third world quarterly, 22(1), 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genç, M., Gheasi, M., Nijkamp, P., & Poot, J. (2012). The impact of immigration on international trade: A meta- analysis. In P. Nijkamp, J. Poot, & M. Sahin (Eds.), Migration impact assessment: New horizons (pp. 301–337). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gesthuizen, M., Van der Meer, T., & Scheepers, P. (2009). Ethnic diversity and social capital in Europe: Tests of Putnam’s thesis in European countries. Scandinavian Political Studies, 32(2), 121–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girma, S., & Yu, Z. (2002). The link between immigration and trade: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Weltwirtschaftliches Archive, 138(1), 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. L. (2005). Inequality: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Gören, E. (2013). Economic effects of domestic and neighbouring countries’ cultural diversity.

  • Gould, D. M. (1994). Immigrant links to the home country: empirical implications for US bilateral trade flows. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(2), 302–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafton, R. Q., & Knowles, S. (2004). Social capital and national environmental performance: A cross-sectional analysis. The Journal of Environment & Development, 13(4), 336–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif, A. (2005). Commitment, coercion, and markets: The nature and dynamics of institutions supporting exchange. Handbook of New Institutional Economics (pp. 727–786). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2009). Cultural biases in economic exchange? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 1095–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartenian, L. S., & Gudmundson, D. E. (2000). Cultural diversity in small business: Implications for firm performance. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 5(3), 209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, K., & Ries, J. (1998). Immigration and trade creation: Econometric evidence from Canada. Canadian Journal of Economics, 31(1), 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. (1984). A simple theory of international trade with multinational corporations. Journal of Political Economy, 92(3), 451–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, C. (1986). Analysis of panel data., Econometric Society Monograph, No. 11 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayne, M. E., & Dipboye, R. L. (2004). Leveraging diversity to improve business performance: Research findings and recommendations for organizations. Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management, 43(4), 409–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, M. (1998). Vertical tax externalities in the theory of fiscal federalism. Staff Papers, 45(3), 454–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, D. (2000). Incentives and disincentives for violence. Boulder: Lynne Reinner Publishers, International Development Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. R. (1979). Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade. Journal of International Economics, 9(4), 469–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1980). Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. The American Economic Review, 70(5), 950–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. R. (1981). Intraindustry specialization and the gains from trade. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 959–973.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15(1), 222–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambsdorff, J. G. (2007). The institutional economics of corruption and reform: Theory, evidence and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, A. (2006). Trust, inequality and ethnic heterogeneity. Economic Record, 82(258), 268–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J. R. (1983). Factor movements and commodity trade as complements. Journal of International Economics, 14(3–4), 341–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, P. (1996). The effects of corruption on growth, investment, and government expenditure (No. 96–98). International Monetary Fund.

  • McLeod, P. L., & Lobel, S. A. (1992). The effects of ethnic diversity on idea generation in small groups. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings.

  • Michalopoulos, S. (2012). The origins of ethnolinguistic diversity. The American Economic Review, 102(4), 1508–1539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milem, J. F. (2003). The educational benefits of diversity: Evidence from multiple sectors. In M. J. Chang, D. Witt, J. Jones, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Compelling interest: Examining the evidence on racial dynamics in higher education (pp. 126–169). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montalvo, J. G., & Reynal-Querol, M. (2005). Ethnic diversity and economic development. Journal of Development Economics, 76(2), 293–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundell, R. A. (1957). International trade and factor mobility. The American Economic Review, 47(3), 321–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nafziger, E. W., & Auvinen, J. (2002). Economic development, inequality, war, and state violence. World Development, 30(2), 153–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettle, D., Grace, J. B., Choisy, M., Cornell, H. V., Guégan, J.-F., & Hochberg, M. E. (2007). Cultural diversity, economic development and societal instability. PLoS ONE, 2(9), e929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, P., Oldekop, J. A., Brodnig, G., Karna, B. K., & Agrawal, A. (2016). Carbon, biodiversity, and livelihoods in forest commons: Synergies, trade-offs, and implications for REDD+. Environmental Research Letters, 11(4), 044017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papyrakis, E. (2013). Environmental performance in socially fragmented countries. Environmental & Resource Economics, 55(1), 119–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, C. (2005). Quantifying the trade-migration nexus of the enlarged EU. A comedy or errors of much ado about nothing.

  • Pervaiz, Z., & Chaudhary, A. R. (2015). Social cohesion and economic growth: An empirical investigation. Australian Economic Review, 48(4), 369–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranis, G. (2011). Diversity of communities and economic development: An overview.

  • Rauch, J. E. (2001). Business and social networks in international trade. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(4), 1177–1203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynal-Querol, M. (2002). Ethnicity, political systems, and civil wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(1), 29–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynal-Querol, M., & Montalvo, J. G. (2005). Ethnic polarization, potential conflict and civil war. American Economic Review, 95(3), 796–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, O. C. (2000). Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 164–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, O. C., Murthi, B., & Ismail, K. (2007). The impact of racial diversity on intermediate and long-term performance: The moderating role of environmental context. Strategic Management Journal, 28(12), 1213–1233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzen, J., Easterly, W., & Woolcock, M. J. (2000). On “good” politicians and” bad” policies: Social cohesion, institutions, and growth. Washington DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G., & Dechant, K. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. Academy of Management Perspectives, 11(3), 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, F., & Rodrik, D. (2000). Trade policy and economic growth: A skeptic’s guide to the cross-national evidence. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 15, 261–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1948). International trade and the equalisation of factor prices. The Economic Journal, 58(230), 163–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, N., Byrne, B., Campbell, A., Harrison, E., McKinley, B., & Shah, P. (2011). The impact of the global economic downturn on communities and poverty in the UK. Foundation JR, editor.

  • Spence, M. (1976). Product differentiation and welfare. The American Economic Review, 66(2), 407–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spolaore, E., & Alesina, A. (2003). The size of nations (Vol. 4). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, H. (2014). UNESCO World Culture Report. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 6773–6774). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svizzero, S., & Tisdell, C. A. (2016). Economic evolution, diversity of societies and stages of economic development: A critique of theories applied to hunters and gatherers and their successors. Cogent Economics & Finance, 4(1), 1161322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple, J. (1999). The new growth evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(1), 112–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trefler, D. (1995). The case of the missing trade and other mysteries. The American Economic Review, 85(5), 1029–1046.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations, Report of the High-level Panel on Threats, Change, & Information. (2004). A more secure world: our shared responsibility: report of the high-level panel on threats, challenges, and change (Vol. 5). United Nations Publications.

  • van Staveren, I., & Pervaiz, Z. (2017). Is it ethnic fractionalization or social exclusion, which affects social cohesion? Social Indicators Research, 130(2), 711–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Videras, J., & Bordoni, C. J. (2006). Ethnic heterogeneity and the enforcement of environmental regulation. Review of Social Economy, 64(4), 539–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigdor, J. L. (2004a). Community composition and collective action: Analyzing initial mail response to the 2000 census. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 303–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigdor, J. L. (2004b). Community composition and collective action: Analyzing initial mail response to the 2000 census. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 303–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, A., & Ferrara, E. L. (2005). Ethnic diversity and economic performance. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(3), 762–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27(2), 151–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), 225–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanikkaya, H. (2003). Trade openness and economic growth: A cross-country empirical investigation. Journal of Development Economics, 72(1), 57–89.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saqib Amin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

List of high-income countries:

Andorra

Ireland

Qatar

Antigua and Barbuda

Israel

San Marino

Australia

Italy

Saudi Arabia

Austria

Japan

Seychelles

Bahamas, The

Kuwait

Singapore

Bahrain

Latvia

Slovak Republic

Barbados

Liechtenstein

Slovenia

Belgium

Lithuania

Spain

Brunei Darussalam

Luxembourg

Sweden

Canada

Malta

Hong Kong, China

Chile

Monaco

Hungary

Cyprus

Netherlands

Iceland

Czech Republic

New Caledonia

Switzerland

Denmark

New Zealand

Trinidad and Tobago

Estonia

Norway

United Arab Emirates

Finland

Oman

United Kingdom

France

Palau

United States

Germany

Poland

Uruguay

Greece

Portugal

 

List of middle-income countries:

Albania

Cameroon

Fiji

Kiribati

Morocco

Algeria

Cape Verde

Gabon

Kyrgyz Republic

Namibia

Angola

China

Georgia

Lao PDR

Nicaragua

Argentina

Colombia

Ghana

Lebanon

Nigeria

Armenia

Congo, Rep.

Grenada

Lesotho

Pakistan

Azerbaijan

Costa Rica

Guatemala

Libya

Panama

Bangladesh

Cote d’Ivoire

Guyana

Macedonia, FYR

Papua New Guinea

Belarus

Croatia

Honduras

Malaysia

Paraguay

Belize

Cuba

India

Maldives

Peru

Bhutan

Djibouti

Indonesia

Marshall Islands

Philippines

Bolivia

Dominica

Iran, Islamic Rep.

Mauritania

Romania

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Dominican Republic

Iraq

Mauritius

Russian Federation

Botswana

Ecuador

Jamaica

Mexico

Samoa

Brazil

Egypt, Arab Rep.

Jordan

Micronesia, Fed. Sts.

Sao Tome and Principe

Bulgaria

El Salvador

Kazakhstan

Moldova

Serbia and Montenegro

Cambodia

Equatorial Guinea

Kenya

Mongolia

Solomon Islands

Suriname

Taiwan, China

Timor-Leste

Turkey

South Africa

Swaziland

Tajikistan

Tonga

Turkmenistan

Sri Lanka

Syrian Arab Republic

Thailand

Tunisia

Ukraine

St. Lucia

Venezuela, RB

Yemen, Rep.

Vanuatu

Uzbekistan

Sudan

Vietnam

Zambia

   

List of low-income countries:

Afghanistan

Liberia

Senegal

Eritrea

Benin

Madagascar

Sierra Leone

Ethiopia

Burkina Faso

Malawi

Somalia

Gambia, The

Burundi

Mali

Tanzania

Guinea

Central African Republic

Mozambique

Togo

Guinea-Bissau

Chad

Nepal

Uganda

Haiti

Comoros

Niger

Rwanda

Zimbabwe

Congo, Dem. Rep.

   

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmad, N., Amin, S. Does ethnic polarization stimulate or relegate trade and environmental performance? A global perspective. Environ Dev Sustain 22, 6513–6536 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00497-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00497-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation