Abstract
This paper combines available assessments on the impacts of climate change with climate projections from an earth system model to estimate the economic consequences for 15 sectors in 11 world regions. If the standard way of thinking about how economies work, the theory of market equilibrium, applies. The aim is to identify potential sources of conflicts between economic interests if the world succeeds in reducing emissions from a pathway with high emissions, where temperatures increase at around +6 °C in 2100 to a lower emission path, where the temperatures increase by +3 °C. Both pathways are recommended by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as standard descriptions of anthropogenic drivers for climate modelling. It is difficult to identify conflicts between developed and developing regions, but conflicts between sector interests are apparent. Fossil fuel extracting industries lose by mitigation in all regions. Nearly all other sectors gain in all regions. The results also reveal potential conflicts between socioeconomic groups. The main challenges relate to conflicts of interest between generations. The present generation can commence on a transformation to low-carbon economies without notable economic consequences, but the next generation stands to lose, while generations beyond will clearly gain.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaheim A (2010) The determination of optimal climate policy. Ecol Econ 69:562–568
Aaheim A, Ahlert G, Meyer M, Meyer B, Orlov A, Heyndrickx C (2015a) Integration of top-down and bottom-up analyses of adaptation to climate change in Europe—the cases of energy transport tourism and health. ToPDAd D3.4, EC Grant Agreement No 308620
Aaheim A, Amundsen H, Dokken T, Wei T (2012) Impacts and adaptation to climate change in European economies. Glob Environ Chang 22:959–968
Aaheim A, Romstad B, Wei T, Kristjánsson JE, Muri H, Niemeier U, Schmidt H (2015b) An economic evaluation of solar radiation management. Sci Total Environ 532:61–69
Aaheim A, Rive N (2005) A model for global responses to anthropogenic changes in the environment (GRACE), CICERO Rep 2005:5 Oslo
Aaheim A, Schjolden A (2004) An approach to utilise climate change impacts studies in national assessments. Glob Environ Chang 14:147–160
Ackermann F (1999) Still dead after all these years: interpreting the failure of general equilibrium theory Working Paper no. 00–01, Global Development and Environmental Institute, Tufts Univ. MA
Anthoff D, Tol RSJ (2014) The income elasticity of the impact of climate change. In Tiezzy S, Martini C (eds) Is the Environment a Luxury? An inquiry into the realtionship between environment and income. Routledge, p 34–47
Badri N G, Walmsley TL (eds) (2008) Global trade, assistance, and production: the GTAP 7 data base. Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue Univ
Biswas BK, Svirezhev Yu M, Bala BK, Wahab MA (2009) Climate change impacts on fish catch in the world fishing grounds. Clim Chang 93(1–2):117–136
Bosello F, Carraro C, de Cian E (2010) Climate policy and the optimal balance between mitigation, adaptation and unavoided damage. Clim Chang Econ 1(2):71–92
Brander KM (2007) Global fish production and climate change. PNAS 104(59):19709–19714
Ciscar J-C (2012) The impacts of climate change in Europe (the PESETA research project). Clim Chang 112(1):1–6
Cline W (2007) Global warming and agriculture impact estimates by country. Center for Glob Dev, Washington DC
de Cian E, Lanzi E, Roson R (2007) The impact of temperature change on energy demand: a dynamic panel analysis. FEEM Work Pap No. 46.2007, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei
Dietz S, Bowen A, Dixon C, Gradwell P (2016) ‘Climate value at risk’ of global financial assets. Nat Clim Chang. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE2972
Eboli F, Parrado R, Roson R (2010) Climate-change feedback on economic growth: explorations with a dynamic general equilibrium model. Environ Dev Econ 15:515–533
Ehmer P, Heymann E (2008) Climate change and tourism: where will the journey lead? Deutche Bank Research, ISSN 1612–3158, Frankfurt
Giorgetta M, Jungclaus JH, Reick CH, Legutke S, Brovkin V, Crueger T, Esch M, Fieg K, Glushak K, Gayler V, Haak H, Hollweg H-D, Ilyina T, Kinne S, Kornblueh L, Matei D, Mauritsen T, Mikolajewicz U, Mueller WA, Notz D, Raddatz T, Rast S, Redler R, Roeckner E, Schmidt H, Schnur R, Segschneider J, Six K, Stockhause M, Wegner J, Widmann H, Wieners K-H, Claussen M, Marotzke J, Stevens B (2013) Climate and carbon cycle changes from 1850 to 2100 in MPI-ESM simulations for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5. J Adv Mod Earth Syst 5:572–597
Gollier C, Weitzmann ML (2010) How should the distant future be discounted when discount rates are uncertain? Econ Lett 107:350–353
Global Carbon Project (2015) CDIAC Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center. http://cdiac.ornl.gov/GCP/carbonbudget
Hope C, Newberry D (2006) Calculating the social cost of carbon. Electricity Policy Research Group Working Papers, No EPRG07/02, University of Cambridge, Cambridge UK
International Monetary Fund IMF (2008) Chapter 4. Climate change and the global economy. World Economic and Financial Surveys: World Economic Outlook: Housing and Business Cycle. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2008/01/index.htm
Kolstad C, Urama K, Broome J, Bruvoll A, Cariρo Olvera M, Fullerton D, Gollier C, Hanemann WM, Hassan R, Jotzo F, Khan MR, Meyer L, Mundaca L (2014) Social, economic and ethical concepts and methods. In: Edenhofe, O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani F, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, von Stechow C, Zwickel T, Minx JC (eds) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Mechler R, Brouwer LM (2015) Understanding trends and projections of disaster losses and climate change: is vulnerability a mission link? Clim Chang 133:23–35
Mendelsohn R, Morrison W, Schlesinger WE, Andronova NG (2000) Country-specific market impacts of climate change. Clim Chang 45:553–569
Nordhaus WD (1991) To slow or not to slow: the economics of the greenhouse effect. Econ J 101:920–937
Nordhaus WD, Boyer J (2000) Warming the world. Economic models of global warming. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass
Nordhaus WD (2008): A question of balance. Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies, Yale University Press
Pindyck RS (2013) Climate change policy: what do the models tell us? J Econ Lit 51(3):860–872
Riahi K, Rao S, Krey V, Cho C, Chirkov V, Fisher G, Kindermann G, Nakicenovic N, Rafai P (2011) RCP8.5—a scenario for comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions. Clim Chang 109:33–57
Stern NH (2006) The stern review. The economics of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Teigland J (2002) Sosialøkonomiske effekter av ekstremvær i Norge—en studie av effekter over tid og rom av nyttårsorkanen i 1992 (in norwegian). VF/Rapport 7/2002. Vestlandsforskning. Sogndal
Tol RSJ (2010) The economic impact of climate change. Perspekt Wirtsch 11(S1):13–37
van Vuuren DP, Edmonds JA, Kainuma M, Riahi K, Thomson AM, Hibbard K, Hurtt GC, Kram T, Krey V, Lamarque J-F, Masui T, Meinshausen M, Nakicenovic N, Smith SJ, Rose S (2011a) The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Chang 109:5–31
van Vuuren DP, Stehfest E, den Elzen MGJ, Kram T, van Vliet J, Deetman S, Isaac M, Glodewijk KK, Hof A (2011b) RCP2.6: exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2 °C. Clim Chang 109:95–116
Weyant JP, de la Chesnaye FC, Blanford GJ (2006) Overview of EMF-21: multigas mitigation and climate policy. Energy J (Special Issue):1–32
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aaheim, A., Wei, T. & Romstad, B. Conflicts of economic interests by limiting global warming to +3 °C. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 22, 1131–1148 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-016-9718-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-016-9718-8