Abstract
Notched alloy 718 tensile specimens prepared by selective laser melting (SLM) and wrought bar were tested at 550, 650, and 750 °C. SLM specimens were tested with either an as-printed or a machined notch. For both types there was a decrease in strength with an increase in test temperature; however, the as-built notches are more sensitive to increases in test temperature than the machined notches. At 550 °C, the machined notch exhibits a roughly 20% higher tensile strength over as-built, while at 750 °C there is a 75% increase in strength. The notched strength ratio decreased with temperature for both types of SLM notches samples, while for wrought samples it increased. The temperature dependence of the difference in strength between the two SLM samples indicates that surface roughness—and the corresponding stress intensity factor—are not the only influences on notched strength. Fractography of tested specimens showed a difference in the intergranular crack propagation depth between as-built and machined notches, demonstrating a difference in the environmental susceptibility based on notch preparation that is due to microstructural differences arising in the SLM process that are preserved through heat treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Sundararaman, P. Mukhopadhyay and S. Banerjee, Carbide Precipitation in Nickel Base Superalloys 718 and 625 and their Effect on Mechanical Properties, Superalloys, 1997, 718, p 625–706
M.J. Donachie and S.J. Donachie, Superalloys: A Technical Guide, 2nd edn. Ingenieria de minas, 2002, ASM International
K. Saravanan et al., Dynamic Strain Aging and Embrittlement Behavior of IN718 During High-Temperature Deformation, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2020, 51(11), p 5691–5703
U. Krupp, Dynamic Embrittlement—Time–Dependent Quasi–Brittle Intergranular Fracture at High Temperatures, Int. Mater. Rev., 2005, 50(2), p 83–97
J.A. Pfaendtner and C.J. McMahon Jr., Oxygen-Induced Intergranular Cracking of a Ni-Base Alloy at Elevated Temperatures—An Example of Dynamic Embrittlement, Acta Mater., 2001, 49(16), p 3369–3377
D.B. Witkin et al., Anomalous Notch Rupture Behavior of Nickel-Based Superalloy Inconel 718 Due to Fabrication by Additive Manufacturing, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2019, 50(8), p 3458–3465
T.D. McLouth et al., Variations in Ambient and Elevated Temperature Mechanical Behavior of IN718 Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting Via Process Parameter Control, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2020, 780, p 139184
M. Prager and G. Sines, Embrittlement of Precipitation Hardenable Nickel-Base Alloys by Oxygen, J. Basic Eng., 1971, 93(2), p 225–230
D.B. Witkin et al., Influence of Surface Conditions and Specimen Orientation on High Cycle Fatigue Properties of Inconel 718 Prepared by Laser Powder Bed Fusion, Int. J. Fatigue, 2020, 132, p 105392
G. Nicoletto, Smooth and Notch Fatigue Behavior of Selectively Laser Melted Inconel 718 with as-Built Surfaces, Int. J. Fatigue, 2019, 128, p 105211
J. Gockel et al., The Influence of Additive Manufacturing Processing Parameters on Surface Roughness and Fatigue Life, Int. J. Fatigue, 2019, 124, p 380–388
A. Suárez et al., Surface Integrity and Fatigue of Non-conventional Machined Alloy 718, J. Manuf. Process., 2019, 48, p 44–50
Nickel Alloy, Corrosion and Heat Resistant, Bars, Forgings, and Rings 52.5Ni 19Cr 3.0Mo 5.1Cb 0.90Ti 0.50Al 19Fe, Consumable Electrode or Vacuum Induction Melted 1775°F (968 °C) Solution and Precipitation Heat Treated. 1965, SAE International
G.E. Totten, ASM Handbook Volume 4E—Heat Treating of Nonferrous Alloys. ASM International, Cleveland
T. McLouth, Microstructural Control and Elevated Temperature Mechanical Properties of Inconel 718 Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting, 2020. UCLA ProQuest ID: McLouth_ucla_0031D_19088
ASTM E292—Standard Test Methods for Conducting Time-for-Rupture Notch Tension Tests of Materials
A. Calleja et al., Inconel®718 Superalloy Machinability Evaluation After Laser Cladding Additive Manufacturing Process, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2018, 97(5), p 2873–2885
D.M. Krahmer et al., Alternatives for Specimen Manufacturing in Tensile Testing of Steel Plates, Exp. Tech., 2016, 40(6), p 1555–1565
ASTM E21 Standard Test Methods for Elevated Temperature Tension Tests of Metallic Materials
T. Yang et al., The Influence of Process Parameters on Vertical Surface Roughness of the AlSi10Mg Parts Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2019, 266, p 26–36
C. Kusuma, The Effect of Laser Power and Scan Speed on Melt Pool Characteristics of Pure Titanium and Ti-6Al-4V Alloy for Selective Laser Melting, 2016
T.D. McLouth et al., The Effect of Laser Focus Shift on Microstructural Variation of Inconel 718 Produced by Selective Laser Melting, Mater. Des., 2018, 149, p 205–213
E. Yasa and J.P. Kruth, Microstructural Investigation of Selective Laser Melting 316L Stainless Steel Parts Exposed to Laser Re-Melting, Proc. Eng., 2011, 19, p 389–395
T. McLouth, Temperature and Strain-Rate Dependence of the Elevated Temperature Tensile Behavior of Inconel 718 Prepared by Selective Laser Melting. Submission in Progress, 2020
ASTM E8—Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials
R. Qu, P. Zhang and Z. Zhang, Notch Effect of Materials: Strengthening or Weakening?, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2014, 30(6), p 599–608
S. Azadian, L.-Y. Wei and R. Warren, Delta Phase Precipitation in Inconel 718, Mater. Charact., 2004, 53(1), p 7–16
R.P. Wei et al., Oxygen Enhanced Crack Growth in Nickel-Based Superalloys and Materials Damage Prognosis, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2009, 76(5), p 715–727
J.F. Muller and M.J. Donachie, The Effects of Solution and Intermediate Heat Treatments on the Notch-Rupture Behavior of Inconel 718, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1975, 6(12), p 2221
C.F. Miller, G.W. Simmons and R.P. Wei, High Temperature Oxidation of Nb, NbC and Ni 3 Nb and Oxygen Enhanced Crack Growth, Scr. Mater., 2000, 42(3), p 227–232
V. Trindade et al., Studying the Role of the Alloy-Grain-Boundary Character During Oxidation of Ni-Base Alloys by Means of the Electron Back-Scattered Diffraction Technique, Mater. High Temp., 2005, 22, p 207–212
E.G. Wagenhuber, V. Trindade and U. Krupp, The Role of Oxygen-Grain-Boundary Diffusion During Intercrystalline Oxidation and Intergranular Fatigue Crack Propagation in Alloy 718, 2005, p 591–600
L.G. Zhao, Modeling of Oxygen Diffusion Along Grain Boundaries in a Nickel-Based Superalloy, J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 2011, 133(3), p 031002-1–031002-7
S. Floreen and R.H. Kane, Effects of Environment on High-Temperature Fatigue Crack Growth in a Superalloy, Metall. Trans. A, 1979, 10(11), p 1745–1751
E. Andrieu et al., Intergranular Crack Tip Oxidation Mechanism in a Nickel-Based Superalloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1992, 154(1), p 21–28
M. Gao, D.J. Dwyer and R.P. Wei, Niobium Enrichment and Environmental Enhancement of Creep Crack Growth in Nickel-Base Superalloys, Scr. Metall. Mater., 1995, 32(8), p 1169–1174
M. Gao, D.J. Dwyer and R.P. Wei, Chemical and Microstructural Aspects of Creep Crack Growth in Inconel 718 Alloy. Superalloys 718, 625, 706 and various derivatives, 1994, p 581–592
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Aerospace Technical Investment Program (ATIP) for their continued support. One of the authors (McLouth) would like to thank The Aerospace Corporation’s Corporate Fellowship for their support as well.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This invited article is part of a special topical focus in the Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance on Additive Manufacturing. The issue was organized by Dr. William Frazier, Pilgrim Consulting, LLC; Mr. Rick Russell, NASA; Dr. Yan Lu, NIST; Dr. Brandon D. Ribic, America Makes; and Caroline Vail, NSWC Carderock.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McLouth, T.D., Witkin, D.B., Lohser, J.R. et al. Elevated Temperature Notch Sensitivity of Inconel 718 Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 30, 4882–4890 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05522-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05522-9