Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of Wind Load on Stepped Tall Building Using CFD Simulation

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The behavior of wind around stepped tall building is quite different comparing with the symmetric plan shape tall building. Setback roof of stepped buildings is widely responsible for the turbulence around the building. The purpose of this work is to understand the behavior of wind load on stepped tall building model. Four different models having the same dimensions and same aspect ratios but different setback distances, namely Models A, B, C and D, are considered. The setback distances are 0.2L, 0.3L, 0.4L and 0.5L (L = length) and are located at H/2 level (H = height) from the base of domain. Computational fluid dynamics simulations are taken out of terrain category 2 with the model scale 1:300. The foreground of this study is the external pressure and force variation around the building face and roof at 0° and 90° wind incidence angles. Maximum positive pressure coefficient develops at 90% of building height from the base of all models and for setback case it goes to 80%. Negative pressure develops at the building roof top, whereas positive pressure develops in the setback roof for the same model and wind angle. This type of pressure variable will be considered in roof design of stepped building.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig.14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amin JA, Ahuja AK (2010) Aerodynamic modifications to the shape of the buildings: a review of the state-of-the-art. Asian J Civ Eng (Build Hous) 11(4):433–450

    Google Scholar 

  • ANSYS CFX-Solver Theory Guide (2012) Release 14.5, October

  • AS/NZS: 1170.2 (2002) Structural design actions, part 2: wind actions. Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand, Sydney, Wellington

  • ASCE/SEI: 7-10 (2010) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineering, Reston

  • Azzi Z, Habte F, Elawady A, Chowdhury AG, Moravej M (2020) Aerodynamic mitigation of wind uplift on low-rise building roof using large-scale testing. Front Built Environ 5(149):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Baby S, Jithin PN, Thomas AM (2015) A study of wind pressure on tall buildings and its aerodynamic modifications against wind excitation. Int J Eng Dev Res 3(4):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Bairagi AK, Dalui SK (2018) Comparison of aerodynamic coefficients of setback tall buildings due to wind load. Asian J Civ Eng Build Hous 19:205–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bairagi AK, Dalui SK (2019) Distribution of wind pressure around different shape tall building. In: 2nd International conference on emerging research in civil. Aeronautical and Mechanical Engineering, Bangalore

  • BS 6399-2 (1997) British standard: loading for buildings part 2. Code of practice for wind loads, British Standard Institution, London

  • Chan CM, Chui JKL, Huang MF (2009) Integrated aerodynamic load determination and stiffness design optimization of tall buildings. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 18:59–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elshaer A, Bitsuamlak G, Damatty AE (2016) Aerodynamic shape optimization of tall buildings using twisting and corner modifications. In: 8th International colloquium on bluff body aerodynamics and application. Northeastern University, Boston

  • EN 1991-1-4:2005/AC (2010) (E) European committee for standardization (CEN). Eurocode 1: actions on structures-part 1–4: general actions -wind actions. European Standard (Eurocode). European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Europe

  • Franke J, Hirsch C, Jensen A, Krüs H, Schatzmann M, Westbury P, Miles S, Wisse J, Wright NG (2004) Recommendations on the use of CFD in wind engineering. COST Action C14; impact of wind and storm on city life and built environment. Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics

  • Franke J, Hellsten A, Schlünzen H, Carissimo B (2007) Best practice guideline for the CFD simulation of flows in the urban environment. COST Action 732

  • Gousseau P, Blocken B, van Heijst GJF (2013) Quality assessment of Large–Eddy simulation of wind flow around a high-rise building: validation and solution verification. Comput Fluids 79:120–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin P, Kilpatrick J, Robinson J, Frisque A (2008) Wind and tall buildings: negatives and positives. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 17:915–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I.S: 875 (Part-3) (2015) Indian standard code of practice for the design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures (part-3. wind loads). Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

  • Jain A, Srinivasan M, Hart GC (2001) Performance based design extreme wind loads on a tall building. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 10:9–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareem A (1992) Dynamic response of high-rise buildings to stochastic wind loads. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 41(44):1101–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kijewski-Correa T, Pirnia JD (2007) Dynamic behavior of tall buildings under wind: insights from full-scale monitoring. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 16:471–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y, Kanda J (2010) Characteristics of aerodynamic forces and pressures on square plan buildings with height variations. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 98:449–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim YC, Kanda J (2013) Wind pressures on tapered and set-back tall buildings. J Fluids Struct 39:306–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim YM, You KP, Ko NH (2008) Across-wind responses of an aeroelastic tapered tall building. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 96:1307–1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim YC, Kanda J, Tamura Y (2011) Wind-induced coupled motion of tall buildings with varying square planwith height. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 99:638–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon DK, Kareem A (2013) Comparative study of major international wind codes and standards for wind effects on tall buildings. Eng Struct 51:23–35

  • Masera D, Ferro GA, Persico R, Sarkisian M, Beghini A, Macheda F, Froio M (2015) Effect of wind loads on non-regularly shaped high-rise buildings. In: 40th Conference on our world in concrete and structures. Singapore, pp 1–9

  • Mendis P, Ngo T, Haritos N, Hira A, Samali B, Cheung J (2007) Wind loading on tall buildings. Electron J Struct Eng Spec Issue Load Struct 7:41–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendis P, Mohotti D, Ngo T (2014)Wind design of tall buildings, problems, mistakes and solutions. In: 1st International conference on infrastructure failures and consequences. Melbourne, Australia

  • Meng Y, Hibi K (1998) Turbulent measurements of the flow field around a high-rise building. J Wind Eng 76:55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal H, Sharma A, Gairola A (2018) Numerical simulation of pedestrian level wind conditions: effect of building shape and orientation. Environmen Fluid Mech 20:663–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rej A, Bairagi AK (2019) Wind load analysis of a tall structure with sharp and corner cut edges. In: 2nd International conference on emerging research in civil. Aeronautical and Mechanical Engineering, Bangalore

  • Revuz J, Hargreaves DM, Owen JS (2012) On the domain size for the steady-state CFD modelling of a tall building. Wind Struct 15(4):313–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy K, Bairagi AK (2016) Wind pressure and velocity around stepped unsymmetrical plan shape tall building using CFD simulation—a case study. Asian J Civ Eng BHRC 17(8):1055–1075

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva AAK, Gupta PK (2013) Wind loads on tall buildings with steps. J Acad Ind Res 1(12):766–768

    Google Scholar 

  • Simiu E, Scanlan RH (1996) Wind effects on structures fundamentals and applications to design, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • S.P 64 (S&T) (2001) Explanatory hand book on Indian standard code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures, part 3 wind loads [IS 875 (part 3): 1987]. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India

  • Tanaka H, Tamura Y, Ohtake K, Nakai M, Kim YC, Bandi EK (2013) Aerodynamic and flow characteristics of tall buildings with various unconventional configurations. Int J High Rise Build 2(3):213–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Tominaga Y, Mochida A, Murakami S, Sawaki S (2008a) Comparison of various revised k–ε models and LES applied to flow around a high-rise building model with 1:1:2 shape placed within the surface boundary layer. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 96:389–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tominaga Y, Mochida A, Yoshie R, Kataoka H, Nozu T, Yoshikawa M, Shirasawaet T (2008b) AIJ guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedestrian wind environment around buildings. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 96:1749–1761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Yu XJ, Zhou Y, Tse KT (2015) A combination method to generate fluctuating boundary conditions for large eddy simulation. Wind Struct 20:579–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weerasuriya AU, Jayasinghe MTR (2014) Wind loads on high-rise buildings by using five major international wind codes and standards. Eng J Inst Eng 3(47):13–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie J (2014) Aerodynamic optimization of super-tall buildings and its effectiveness assessment. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 130:88–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Xie J (2015) Assessment of across-wind responses for aerodynamic optimization of tall buildings. Wind Struct Techno Press Ltd 21(5):505–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan BW, Li QS (2015) Inflow turbulence generation methods with large eddy simulation for wind effects on tall buildings. Comput Fluids 116:158–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zils J, Viise J (2003) An introduction to high-rise design. Struct Mag  pp.12–16

  • Zu G, Lam KM (2018) LES and wind tunnel test of flow around two tall. Build Staggered Arrange Comput 6(28):1–18

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sujit Kumar Dalui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bairagi, A.K., Dalui, S.K. Estimation of Wind Load on Stepped Tall Building Using CFD Simulation. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 45, 707–727 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-020-00535-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-020-00535-1

Keywords

Navigation