Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Germ Cell–Specific Markers ZPBP2 and PGK2 in Testicular Biopsies Can Predict the Presence as well as the Quality of Sperm in Non-obstructive Azoospermia Patients

  • Regenerative Medicine: Original Article
  • Published:
Reproductive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To assess the role of three testis-specific genes including ZPBP2, PGK2, and ACRV1 in the prediction of sperm retrieval result and quality of retrieved sperm by microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) patients. This was a case-control study including 57 testicular samples of NOA patients including 32 patients with successful sperm retrieval (NOA+) and 25 patients with failed sperm retrieval (NOA-), and 9 samples of men with normal spermatogenesis in the testes as the positive control (OA). We investigated the expression of candidate genes by RT-qPCR and germ cell population patterns by DNA flow cytometry in testicular biopsy samples. The association between PGK2 expressions with the quality of retrieved spermatozoa was also evaluated. The RT-qPCR data revealed a significantly higher expression of ZPBP2 and PGK2 in the NOA+ in comparison to NOA- group (P = 0.002, and P = 0.002, respectively). Flow cytometry results revealed that the haploid cell percentage was significantly higher in NOA+ vs. NOA- group (P = 0.0001). In samples with a higher percentage of haploid cells, expression levels of ZPBP2 and PGK2 were higher (P = 0.001). The PGK2 expression was significantly associated with retrieved sperm quality (P = 0.01). Our results contribute to the search for the biomarkers for predicting the presence of testicular sperm and would be useful to avoid unnecessary multiple micro-TESE. Overall, the expression pattern of the ZPBP2 and PGK2 may be useful in predicting sperm recovery success and quality of retrieved sperm in NOA patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wosnitzer M, Goldstein M, Hardy MP. Review of Azoospermia. Spermatogenesis [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2019 Jul 31];4:e28218. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25105055.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker K, Sabanegh E. Obstructive azoospermia: reconstructive techniques and results. Clinics (Sao Paulo) [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2019 Jul 31];68 Suppl 1:61–73. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23503955.

  3. McLachlan RI, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Hoei-Hansen CE, de Kretser DM, Skakkebaek NE. Histological evaluation of the human testis - approaches to optimizing the clinical value of the assessment: mini review. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. El-Haggar S, Mostafa T, Abdel Nasser T, Hany R, Abdel Hadi A. Fine needle aspiration vs. mTESE in non-obstructive azoospermia. Int J Androl [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2019 Jul 31];31:595–601. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17822417.

  5. Vernaeve V, Tournaye H, Schiettecatte J, Verheyen G, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. Serum inhibin B cannot predict testicular sperm retrieval in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 2002 [cited 2019 Jul 31];17:971–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11925393.

  6. Flannigan R, Bach PV, Schlegel PN. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(4):745–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Drabovich AP, Dimitromanolakis A, Saraon P, Soosaipillai A, Batruch I, Mullen B, et al. Differential diagnosis of azoospermia with proteomic biomarkers ECM1 and TEX101 quantified in seminal plasma. Sci Transl Med [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2019 Jul 31];5:212ra160. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24259048.

  8. Korbakis D, Schiza C, Brinc D, Soosaipillai A, Karakosta TD, Légaré C, et al. Preclinical evaluation of a TEX101 protein ELISA test for the differential diagnosis of male infertility. BMC Med. 2017;15:60–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Katoh M, Katoh M. Identification and characterization of human ZPBP-like gene in silico. Int J Mol Med [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2019 Jul 31];12:399–404. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12883658.

  10. Liu X, Li Q, Wang W, Liu F. Aberrant expression of sperm-specific glycolytic enzymes are associated with poor sperm quality. Mol Med Rep. 2019;19:2471–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Baksi A, Vasan SS, Dighe RR. DNA flow cytometric analysis of the human testicular tissues to investigate the status of spermatogenesis in azoospermic patients. Sci Rep. 2018;8:11117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Song GJ, Lee H, Park Y. Expression pattern of germ cell – specific genes in the testis of patients with nonobstructive azoospermia : usefulness as a molecular marker to predict the presence of testicular sperm. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:1104–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schlegel PN. Testicular sperm extraction : microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;14:131–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Riccardi C, Nicoletti I. Analysis of apoptosis by propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:1458–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tournaye H, Krausz C, Oates RD. Male reproductive impairment 2 concepts in diagnosis and therapy for male reproductive impairment. LANCET Diabetes Endocrinol [Internet]. 2016;8587:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30043-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tash JA and Schlegel PN. Histologic effects of testicular sperm extraction. Urology. 2001;4295:0–3.

  17. Chen S, Hsieh J, Yu H, Chang H. Appropriate cut-off value for follicle-stimulating hormone in azoospermia to predict spermatogenesis. 2010;8:108–13.

  18. Kleiman SE, Ph D, Lehavi O, Hauser R, Botchan A, Paz G, et al. CDY1 and BOULE transcripts assessed in the same biopsy as predictive markers for successful testicular sperm retrieval. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2011;95:2297-2302.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.03.020.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stahl PJ, Mielnik A, Schlegel PN, Paduch DA, Ph D. Heat shock factor Y chromosome ( HSFY ) mRNA level predicts the presence of retrievable testicular sperm in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2011;96:303–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.055.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bonaparte E, Moretti M, Colpi GM, Nerva F, Contalbi G, Vaccalluzzo L, et al. ESX1 gene expression as a robust marker of residual spermatogenesis in azoospermic men. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1398–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hashemi MS, Mozdarani H, Ghaedi K, N-EM. Among seven testis-specific molecular markers , SPEM1 appears to have a significant clinical value for prediction of sperm retrieval in azoospermic men. Andrology. 2018;6:890–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kazemeyni SM. Correlation between antisperm antibodies and successful testicular sperm extraction in azoospermic men. Reprod Biomed Online [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2020 Jun 22];7(Suppl 1):30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lin Y, Roy A, Yan W, Burns KH, Matzuk MM. Loss of Zona Pellucida binding proteins in the acrosomal matrix disrupts acrosome biogenesis and sperm morphogenesis. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:6794–805.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Torabi F, Bogle OA, Estanyol JM, Oliva R, Miller D. Zona pellucida-binding protein 2 ( ZPBP2 ) and several proteins containing BX7B motifs in human sperm may have hyaluronic acid binding or recognition properties. Mol Hum Reprod. 2017;23:803–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu X, Zhang H, Shen X, Liu F, Liu J, Wang W. Characteristics of testis-specific phosphoglycerate kinase 2 and its association with human sperm quality. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:273–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu X, Liu F. In - depth mapping of human testicular and epididymal proteins and their functional association with spermatozoa. Mol Med Rep. 2015;12:173–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Xiao-fang, Liu Shen F. Comparative analysis of human reproductive proteomes identifies candidate proteins of sperm maturation. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;12:10257–63.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tang A, Yan Q, Sun L, Diao R, Yu Z, Zhang Z, et al. Developmental expression of ACRV1 in humans and mice. Andrologia. 2011;21:16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Clausen OPF, Abyholm T. Deoxyribonucleic acid flow cytometry of germ cells in the investigation of male infertility. Fertil Steril. 1980;34:369–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Guler I, Erdem M, Erdem A, Demirdağ E, Tunc L, Bozkurt N, et al. Impact of testicular histopathology as a predictor of sperm retrieval and pregnancy outcome in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia: correlation with clinical and hormonal factors. Andrologia. 2016;48:765–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee S, Park CW, Cheon Y, Lim CK. Potential of testicular sperm to support embryonic development to the blastocyst stage is comparable to that of ejaculated sperm. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35:1103–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yang Q, Huang YP, Wang HX, Hu K, Wang YX, Huang YR, et al. Follicle - stimulating hormone as a predictor for sperm retrieval rate in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia : a systematic review and meta - analysis. Asian J Androl. 2015;17:281–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the patients who participated in the study for their important collaboration. We also thank the andrologists from the Andrology Unit of the Royan Institute, Tehran, Iran, who helped provide samples for this study. A special acknowledgment is dedicated to the staff of the Embryology Laboratory of Tehran University of Medical Sciences for their constant support.

Funding

This work was financially supported by a grant from the Tehran University of Medical Sciences (No. 37940). This is an original article as a part of a Ph.D. student thesis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Nasrin Ghanami Gashti, Maryam Qasemi, Narjes Feizollahi & Mehdi Abbasi

  2. Department of Andrology, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran

    Mohammad Ali Sadighi Gilani

  3. Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Mohammad Ali Sadighi Gilani

  4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moluod Infertility Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran

    Ayob Jabari

Authors
  1. Nasrin Ghanami Gashti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohammad Ali Sadighi Gilani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ayob Jabari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maryam Qasemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Narjes Feizollahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mehdi Abbasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Mehdi Abbasi and Mohammad Ali Sadighi Gilani designed the project, supervised the study, and reviewed the manuscript; Mohammad Ali Sadighi Gilani provided samples and performed clinical assessment; Nasrin Ghanami Gashti performed sample collection and the experiments, wrote the manuscript, and performed data analysis; Mohammad Ali Sadighi Gilani and Nasrin Ghanami Gashti performed recruitment of patients and clinical data acquisition; Ayob Jabari and Maryam Qasemi supported and assisted in conducting experiments; Narjes Feizollahi performed materials support. All authors approved the final manuscript for publishing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Abbasi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 14 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghanami Gashti, N., Sadighi Gilani, M. ., Jabari, A. et al. The Germ Cell–Specific Markers ZPBP2 and PGK2 in Testicular Biopsies Can Predict the Presence as well as the Quality of Sperm in Non-obstructive Azoospermia Patients. Reprod. Sci. 28, 1466–1475 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-020-00427-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-020-00427-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation