Abstract
The gender pay gap is one of the central themes of inequality in the workplace and remains at the heart of the political and social debate. Almost all prior executive pay studies focus on a geographic region or industry to uncover gender pay differences. Since firms differ in size and industry, prior studies used diverse conditional variables to deal with the heterogeneity issues. We use a new approach, executive replacement, to analyze the gender pay gap. Since we study the pay gap in the same firm, most heterogeneity issues disappear. We examine if the gender pay gap exists at the executive level when someone from the opposite sex replace an executive. We use a large sample of 4532 publicly traded firms and 302,729 annual pay observations spanning over 25 years (1992 to 2019). We find that a significant difference in total compensation for female CEOs (compared to male CEOs) does not exist at the aggregate level. However, the 'twenty-percent pay gap' does exist during executive turnover. Our results indicate that female executives face a representation problem, not a compensation discrimination problem. Moreover, evidence suggests that female CEOs are swiftly replaced when a company's stock performance suffers. Female CEOs turn around the company's sagging stock performance better than male CEOs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/title-vii-civil-rights-act-1964.
The Equal Pay Act of 1963: https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/equal-pay-act-1963.
US Census Bureau, income and poverty: https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2018/demo/p60-263.html.
Compustat ExecuComp Data, from 1992 to 2019: https://wrds-www.wharton.upenn.edu/pages/support/manuals-and-overviews/compustat/execucomp/overview-executive-compensation/.
CRSP US Stock Data, monthly Stock file data: https://wrds-www.wharton.upenn.edu/pages/support/data-overview/wrds-overview-crsp-us-stock-database/.
Wharton Research Data Services, WRDS: https://wrds-www.wharton.upenn.edu/pages/about/.
DEF14A forms: https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/answersproxyhtfhtm.html.
Basics of Executive Compensation: https://execcomp.org/Basics/Basic/What-Is-Executive-Compensation.
References
Agrawal, Anup, Charles R. Knoeber, and Theofanis Tsoulouhas. 2006. Are outsiders handicapped in CEO successions? Journal of Corporate Finance 12 (3): 619–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2004.04.005.
Alkalbani, Nasser, Francesca Cuomo, and Christine Mallin. 2019. Gender diversity and say-on-pay: Evidence from UK remuneration committees. Corporate Governance: An International Review 27 (5): 378–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12292.
Arulampalam, Wiji, Alison L. Booth, and Mark L. Bryan. 2007. Is there a glass ceiling over Europe? Exploring the gender pay gap across the wage distribution. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 60 (2): 163–186.
Bertrand, Marianne, and Kevin F. Hallock. 2001. The gender gap in top corporate jobs. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 55 (1): 3–21.
Blau, Francine D., and Lawrence M. Kahn. 2003. Understanding international differences in the gender pay gap. Journal of Labor Economics 21 (1): 106–144. https://doi.org/10.1086/344125.
Blau, Francine D., and Lawrence M. Kahn. 2006. The U.S. gender pay gap in the 1990S: Slowing convergence. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 60(1): 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979390606000103.
Blau, Francine D., and Lawrence M. Kahn. 2007. The gender pay gap. Academy of Management Perspectives 21 (1): 7–23. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2007.24286161.
Bruckmüller, Susanne, and Nyla R. Branscombe. 2010. The glass cliff: When and why women are selected as leaders in crisis contexts. British Journal of Social Psychology 49 (3): 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X466594.
Bruckmüller, Susanne, Michelle K. Ryan, Floor Rink, and S. Alexander Haslam. 2014. Beyond the glass ceiling: The glass cliff and its lessons for organizational policy. Social Issues and Policy Review 8 (1): 202–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12006.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2019. Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm
Carter, Mary Ellen, Francesa Franco, and Mireia Gine. 2017. Executive gender pay gaps: The roles of female risk aversion and board representation. Contemporary Accounting Research 34 (2): 1232–1264. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12286.
Chamberlain, Andrew 2016. Demystifying the gender pay gap. Glassdoor. https://www.classlawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/glassdoor-gender-pay-gap-study.pdf.
Curtis, John W. 2010. Faculty salary equity: Still a gender gap? On Campus with Women 39 (1).
Dolan, Julie. 2004. Gender equity: Illusion or reality for women in the federal executive service? Public Administration Review 64 (3): 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00374.x.
Eveline, Joan, and Patricia Todd. 2009. Gender mainstreaming: The answer to the gender pay gap? Gender, Work & Organization 16 (5): 536–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2007.00386.x.
Fins, Amanda. 2019. Women and the lifetime wage gap: How many woman years does it take to equal 40 man years? NWLC.Org. https://nwlc.org/resources/women-and-the-lifetime-wage-gap-how-many-woman-years-does-it-take-to-equal-40-man-years/.
Gayle, George-Levi, Limor Golan, and Robert A. Miller. 2012. Gender differences in executive compensation and job mobility. Journal of Labor Economics 30 (4): 829–872. https://doi.org/10.1086/666615.
Graf, Nikki, Anna Brown, and Eileen Patten. 2018. The narrowing, but persistent, gender gap in pay. Radnor Reports. https://radnorreports.com/2019/04/18/the-narrowing-but-persistent-gender-gap-in-pay-2/https://radnorreports.com/2019/04/18/the-narrowing-but-persistent-gender-gap-in-pay-2/
Guillaume, Cécile, and Sophie Pochic. 2009. What would you sacrifice? Access to top management and the work–life balance. Gender, Work & Organization 16 (1): 14–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2007.00354.x.
Hill, Aaron D., Arun D. Upadhyay, and Rafik I. Beekun. 2015. Do female and ethnically diverse executives endure inequity in the CEO position or do they benefit from their minority status? An empirical examination. Strategic Management Journal 36 (8): 1115–1134. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2274.
Hinchliffe, Emma. 2020. The number of women running Fortune 500 companies hits an all-time record. Fortune, May 18. https://fortune.com/2020/05/18/women-ceos-fortune-500-2020/.
Kaplan, Steven N. 2008. Are US CEOs overpaid? Academy of Management Perspectives 22 (2): 5–20. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2008.32739755.
Lewis, Gregory B. 1997. Race, sex, and performance ratings in the federal service. Public Administration Review 57 (6): 479–489. https://doi.org/10.2307/976959.
Lewis, Gregory B. 1998. Continuing progress toward racial and gender pay equality in the federal service: An update. Review of Public Personnel Administration 18 (2): 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X9801800203.
Mani, Bonnie G. 1997. Gender and the federal senior executive Service: Where is the glass ceiling? Public Personnel Management 26 (4): 545–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102609702600411.
Martijn Cremers, K.J., and Yaniv Grinstein. 2014. Does the market for CEO talent explain controversial CEO pay practices? Review of Finance 18 (3): 921–960. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rft024.
Mason, Mary Anne. 2011. The pyramid problem. The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 9.
Morrison, Anne M., Randall P. White, Ellen Van Velsor, and the Center for Creative Leadership. 1987. Breaking the glass ceiling: Can women reach the top of America’s largest corporations? Saddle River: Pearson Education.
Muñoz-Bullón, Fernando. 2010. Gender-compensation differences among high-level executives in the United States. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 49 (3): 346–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.2010.00604.x.
Riccucci, Norma M. 2009. The pursuit of social equity in the Federal Government: A road less traveled? Public Administration Review 69 (3): 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.01984.x.
Ryan, Michelle K., and S. Alexander Haslam. 2005. The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over-represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of Management 16 (2): 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00433.x.
Ryan, Michelle K., S Alexander Haslam, Thekla Morgenroth, Floor Rink, Janka Stoker, and Kim Peters. 2016. Getting on top of the glass cliff: Reviewing a decade of evidence, explanations, and impact. The Leadership Quarterly 27 (3): 446–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.008.
Sabharwal, Meghna. 2015. From glass ceiling to glass cliff: Women in senior executive service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (2): 399–426. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut030.
Shehu, Elona, Khurram Shahzad, Ghulame Rubbaniy, and Abida Perveen. 2017. Gender premium and economic downswings. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 14: 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2017.03.001.
Talukdar, Bakhtear. 2017. Are female CEOs paid less ? /paper/Are-Female-CEOs-Paid-Less-Talukdar/2dd61c2e7c7b2541264bd2c9efa8c233f2257190.
Wall Street Journal. 1986. The corporate woman: A special report.
Weichselbaumer, Doris, and Rudolph Winter-Ebmer. 2005. A meta-analysis of the international gender wage gap. Journal of Economic Surveys 19 (3): 479–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0950-0804.2005.00256.x.
Weisbach, Michael S. 1988. Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 431–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90053-0.
Yonker, Scott E. 2017. Geography and the market for CEOs. Management Science 63 (3): 609–630. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2319.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malladi, R.K., Mean, J.D. Is it a gender representation issue or a gender pay gap issue? A study of the replaced executives in the USA. Bus Econ 56, 67–80 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s11369-021-00208-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s11369-021-00208-5