Skip to main content
Log in

The Influence of the Hydrodynamic Response of the Flare Plasma on the Kinetics of an Accelerated Electron Beam and Hard X-rays

  • Published:
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The transfer of accelerated electrons in the plasma of flaring loops is accompanied by a hydrodynamic response of the heated plasma. The dynamics of the accelerated electron beam was determined from the solution of the one-dimensional, time-dependent relativistic Fokker-Planck equation, and the hydrodynamic response of the thermal plasma was studied by integrating a system of one-dimensional equations using the numerical RADYN code. Thus, the electron distribution function and thermal plasma parameters are changing self-consisting. In this problem the most important values are the energy flux, the duration of continuous injection, and the accelerated electrons spectrum. The most significant for the beam—thermal plasma system is the process of plasma evaporation. The upflows of the plasma (evaporation) increases the looptop plasma density comparing with steady-state value and thus reduces the Coulomb mean free path of fast electrons over time. For impulsive events, we consider heating plasma by electron beams with the energy flux of 3 × 1010, 1011 erg cm–2 s–1 in the energy band from 25 keV up to 10 MeV, and duration of 20 s, which is quite consistent with M-X GOES class flares. It is shown that for impulsive events, the effect of plasma “evaporation” for the specified values of the energy flux, isotropic pitch-angle distributions of the accelerated electrons, and power–low energy spectra leads to an increase of the plasma density in the magnetic loop on one-two orders near the transition region only. The effect of plasma evaporation is insignificant and does not affect the hard X-rays from the top of the loop for the considered parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Allred, J.C., Kowalski, A.F., and Carlsson, M., A unified computational model for solar and stellar flares, Astrophys. J., 2015, vol. 809, no. 1, id 104.

  2. Aschwanden, M.J., Physics of the Solar Corona, Berlin–Heidelberg: Springer, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aschwanden, M.J., Brown, J.C., and Kontar, E.P., Chromospheric height and density measurements in a solar flare observed with RHESSI II. Data analysis, Sol. Phys., 2002, vol. 210, nos. 1–2, pp. 383–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Charikov, Y.E. and Shabalin, A.N., Influence of magnetic turbulence on the propagation of accelerated electrons and hard X-ray brightness distribution in solar flares, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2015, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1104–1111.

  5. Charikov, Y.E. and Shabalin, A.N., Hard X-ray generation in the turbulent plasma of solar flares, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2016, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 1068–1074.

  6. Hamilton, R.J., Lu, E.T., and Petrosian, V., Numerical solution of the time-dependent kinetic equation for electrons in magnetized plasma, Astrophys. J., 1990, vol. 354, pp. 726–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, W., Petrosian, V., and Mariska, J.T., Combined modeling of acceleration, transport, and hydrodynamic response in solar flares. I. The numerical model, Astrophys. J., 2009, vol. 702, no. 2, pp. 1553–1566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Reznikova, V.E., Melnikov, V.F., Shibasaki, K., et al., 2002 August 24 limb flare loop: Dynamics of microwave brightness distribution, Astrophys. J., 2009, vol. 697, no. 1, pp. 735–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Somov, B.V., On hydrodynamic models of the effect of flares on the solar chromosphere, Sov. Astron. Lett., 1980, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 597–601.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vernazza, J.E., Avrett, E.H., and Loeser, R., Structure of the solar chromosphere. II. The underlying photosphere and temperature-minimum region, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 1976, vol. 30, pp. 1–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vernazza, J.E., Avrett, E.H., and Loeser, R., Structure of the solar chromosphere. III. Models of the EUV brightness components of the quiet-sun, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 1981, vol. 45, pp. 635–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zharkova, V.V., Kuznetsov, A.A., and Siversky, T.V., Diagnostics of energetic electrons with anisotropic distributions in solar flares. I. Hard X-rays bremsstrahlung emission, Astron. Astrophys., 2010, vol. 512, id A8.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu. E. Charikov.

Ethics declarations

FUNDING

This work is supported by the Russian Science Foundation under grant no. 20-72-10158.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Charikov, Y.E., Shabalin, A.N. The Influence of the Hydrodynamic Response of the Flare Plasma on the Kinetics of an Accelerated Electron Beam and Hard X-rays. Geomagn. Aeron. 60, 1071–1078 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793220080046

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793220080046

Navigation