Abstract
Embedded piezoresistive microcantilever (EPM) sensors were used to detect the presence of the compound estrogen in water samples. The sensor was fabricated with a host material hydrogel (Hypol) functionalized with estrogen antibody. This sensor was able to detect 1 ppm of estrogen in water, responding almost immediately to the estrogen addition, with a full sensor response (saturation) occurring after two minutes of exposure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. G. Anderson, T. K. Jensen, E. Carlsen, N. Jorgensen, A. M. Andersson, T. Krarup, N. Keiding, and N. E. Skakkabaek, Hum. Reprod., vol. 15, p. 366, 2000.
T. P. Rodgers-Gray, S. Jobling, C. Kelly, S. morris, G. Brightly, M. J. Waldock, J. P. Sumpter, and C. R. Tyler, Environ. Sci. Technol, vol. 35, p. 462, 2001.
D. W. Kolpin, E. T. Furlong, M. T. Meyer, E. M. Thurman, S. D. Zaugg, L. B. Barber, and H. T. Buxton, “Pharmaceuticals, Hormones, and Other Organic Wastewater Contaminants in U.S. Streams,” Environ. Sci. Technol, vol. 36, p. 1202–1211, 2002.
L. J. Guillette, “Endocrine Disrupting Contaminants - Beyond the Dogma,” Environ. Health Perspect., vol. 114, p. 9–12, 2006.
C. Bogi, J. Schwaiger, H. Ferling, U. Mallow, C. Steineck, F. Sinowatz, W. Kalbfus, R. D. Negele, I. Lutz, and W. Kloas, “Endocrine Effects of Environmental Pollution on Xenopus Laevis and Rana Temporaria,” Environ. Res., vol. 93, p. 195–201, 2003.
S. Jobling, M. Nolan, C. R. Tyler, G. Brightly, and J. P. Sumpter, “Widespread Sexual Disruption in Wild Fish,” Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 32, p. 2398–2506, 1998.
R. L. Gunter, W. Delinger, T. L. Porter, R. Stewart, and J. Reed, “Hydration level monitoring using embedded piezoresistive microcantilever sensors,” Medical Engineering and Physics, vol. 27, p. 215–220, 2005.
R. L. Gunter, W. G. Delinger, K. Manygoats, A. Kooser, and T. L. Porter, “Viral detection using an embedded piezoresistive microcantilever sensor,” Sensors and Actuators (A), vol. A107, p. 219–224, 2003.
R. L. Gunter, R. Zhine, W. Delinger, K. Manygoats, A. Kooser, and T. L. Porter, “Investigation of DNA sensing using piezoresistive microcantilever probes,” IEEE Sensors, vol. 4, p. 430–433, 2004.
T. L. Porter, W. Delinger, and R. L. Gunter, “ Embedded Piezoresistive Microcantilever Sensors: Materials for Sensing Chemical and Biological Analytes,” Proc. Materials Research Soc., 2005.
T. L. Porter, W. Delinger, and R. Venedam, “Gas Detection Using Embedded Piezoresistive Microcantilever Sensors in a Wireless Network,” Sensors and Transducers, vol. 94, p. 133–138, 2008.
T. L. Porter, T. R. Dillingham, and R. J. Venedam, “A microcantilever sensor array for the detection and inventory of desert tortoises,” Applied Herpetology, vol. 5, p. 293–301, 2008.
T. L. Porter, T. Vail, J. Reed, and R. Stewart, “Detection of Hydrogen Fluoride Gas Using Piezoresistive Microcantilever Sensors,” Sensors and Materials, vol. 20, p. 103–110, 2008.
T. L. Porter, T. Vail, and R. Venedam, “Detection of Organophosphate Gases and Biological Molecules using Embedded Piezoresistive Microcantilever Sensors,” Proc. Mater. Res. Soc., vol. 1086E, p. 1086-u08-02, 2008.
T. L. Porter and W. Delinger, “LabView based piezoresistive microcantilever sensor system,” Sensors and Transducers, vol. 68, p. 568–574, 2006.
T. L. Porter, T. Vail, M. P. Eastman, R. Stewart, J. Reed, R. Venedam, and W. Delinger, “A solid-state sensor platform for the detection of hydrogen cyanide gas,” Sensors and Actuators, vol. 123, p. 313–317, 2007.
A. Kooser, K. Manygoats, M. P. Eastman, and T. L. Porter, “Investigation of the antigen antibody reaction between anti-bovine serum albumin and bovine serum albumin using piezorsistive microcantilever sensors,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 19, p. 503–508, 2003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Porter, T.L., Vail, T., Propper, C.R. et al. Bio-composite Materials for the Detection of Estrogen in Water Using Piezoresistive Microcantilever Sensors. MRS Online Proceedings Library 1253, 1010 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-1253-K10-10
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-1253-K10-10