Abstract
A systematic evaluation of radionuclide solubility has been conducted for the Yucca Mountain Project. The conventional thermodynamic approach was employed and geochemical model calculations were used to estimate radionuclide solubilities for the base case. The study uses the computer code EQ3/6 as the major geochemical modeling tool. The water composition and environmental conditions are based on the results of in-package chemistry and in-drift chemistry studies. Field observations, laboratory measurements, and thermodynamic and kinetic considerations are utilized to ensure the resulting solubilities are conservative. Fourteen radioelements have been studied (U, Np, Pu, Th, Am, Ac, Tc, I, C, Cs, Sr, Ra, Pa, and Pb) and their solubilities are presented as either functions of environmental conditions or statistical distributions. An alternative source term model for Np, which was based on measurements of spent fuel dissolution experiments rather than conventional thermodynamic considerations, was also developed. Comparison of it with the Np base case solubility model suggests that it is necessary to advance our understanding about the behaviors of Np during the process of spent fuel corrosion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Y. Chen, A. Loch, T. Wolery, R. Gaylord, and W. Halsey, CRWMS M&O Report ANL-WISMD-000010 REV 01, (2000)
Y. Chen, P. Brady, BSC Report CAL-WIS-MD-000012 REV 00, (2001)
I. Grenthe, Radiochimica Acta, 52/53, 425–432. (1991)
D. Langmuir, Aqueous Environmental Geochemistry, (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1997) p.531.
T. Wolery, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report UCRL-MA-110662, (1992).
T.L. Steinborn, CRWMS M&O Report TDR-NBS-HS-000003 REV 00, (2000).
R. Finch, J. Suksi, K. Rasilainen, and R. Ewing, in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXI, edited by W. Murphy and D. Knecht, (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 412, Pittsburgh, PA, 1996) pp.823–830.
D. Efurd, W. Runde, J. Banar, D. Janecky et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 32, pp.3893-3900.
H. Nitsche et al., Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-12562-MS, (1993).
J.M. Cleveland, The Chemistry of Plutonium, (American Nuclear Society, 1979).
D. Rai, D. and J. Ryan, Radiochimica Acta, 30, pp.213–216 (1982).
D. Marani et al., Wat. Res., 29, pp.1085–1092, (1995).
J. Berry et al., Analyst, 114, pp. 339–347 (1989).
P. Burns, R. Ewing, and M. Miller, Jour. of Nucl. Mat., 245, pp.1–9, (1997).
E. Buck, R. Finch, P. Finn, and J. Bates, in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXI, edited by I. McKinley and C. McCombie, (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 506, Warrendale, PA, 1998) pp.87–94.
P. Finn et al., Radiochimica Acta, 66/67, p. 189–195 (1994).
P. Finn et al., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XX, edited by W. Gray, (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 465, Warrendale, PA, 1997), p. 527–534.
P. Finn, CRWMS M&O Report LLYMP0001064, (1999).
D. Sassani, and E. Siegmann CRWMS M&O Report B00000000–01717-2200–00191, (1997).
J. Bruno et al., Presented at 1998 International Spent Fuel Workshop, Las Vegas, Nevada, 1998.
D. Wronkiewicz, E. Buck, J. Bates, in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XX, edited by W. Gray, (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 465, Warrendale, PA, 1997), p. 519–516.
W.M. Murphy, Geological Society of America 2000 Abstracts, v. 32, no. 7, p. A–291.
W. Murphy and R. Codell, in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXII, edited by D. Wronkiewicz and J. Lee, (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 556, Warrendale, PA, 1999) pp.551–558.
Y. Chen et al., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXII, edited by D. Wronkiewicz and J. Lee, (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 556, Warrendale, PA, 1999) pp. 471–478.
Y. Chen, in CRWMS M&O Report B00000000–01717-4301–00006 REV 01, (1998).
C. Wilson, Pacific Northwest Laboratory Report PNL-7169, (1990).
C. Wilson, Pacific Northwest Laboratory Report PNL-7170, (1990).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, Y., Loch, A.R., Wolery, T.J. et al. Solubility Evaluation for Yucca Mountain TSPA-SR. MRS Online Proceedings Library 713, 104 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-713-JJ10.4
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-713-JJ10.4