Skip to main content

Conclusion: Diversity in the Future

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
An Historical Analysis of Skin Color Discrimination in America
  • 1506 Accesses

Abstract

Discrimination on the basis of race, in the United States and elsewhere, is a tenacious social pathology that has plagued Western civilization. It is among the most potent topics for public discussion, in particular among interracial audiences. Most scholars trace the origins of discrimination to the Atlantic slave trade and European colonization. Subsequently, African-Americans are cast as victims and Euro-Americans by way of the slave trade as the perpetrators of African-American victimization. Eventually such victimization spread to other non-European, non-biracial, male, gay, and lesbian immigrant populations, whose demographic status located them on the periphery of the Western power structure. However, the origin of racial and other forms of discrimination is much more extensive than the Western power structure, which historically Western scholars in particular have been unwilling to acknowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Herrnstein, R., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beatty, B. (2009). The bell curve. (Revised article) [Human Intelligence online]. http://www.indiana.edu/intell/bellcurve.shtml. Accessed 26 June 2009.

  3. Bradley, M. (1978). The iceman inheritance. Toronto: Dorset.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Welsing, F. (1970). The Cress theory of color confrontation and racism. Washington, DC: C-R Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kitano, H. (1985). Race relations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Powell, A. (1997). Through my grandfather’s eyes: ties that bind. Paper presented at the 1997 National Conference of African American Studies and Hispanic and Latino Studies, Houston, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pratt, J. (1950). America’s colonial experiment. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hall, R. (2003). Discrimination among oppressed populations. Lewiston, NY: Mellen.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hyde, C. (1995). The meanings of whiteness. Qualitative Sociology, 18(1), 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cooley, C. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Schreiber.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chan, S. (1991). Asian Americans: an interpretive history. Boston: Twayne.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hedley, M. (1994). The presentation of gendered conflict in popular movies: affective stereotypes, cultural sentiments, and men’s motivation. Sex Roles, 31, 721–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoetink, H. (1967). The two variants in Caribbean race relations: A contribution to the sociology of segmented societies. (E. M. Hookykaas, Trans.) London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bales, R. (1951). Interaction process analysis: a method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., and White, R. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created social climates. Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shaw, M. (1976). The psychology of small groups. Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 111–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Homans, G. (1974). Elementary forms of social behavior. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Crosbie, P. (1975). Interaction in small groups. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gleitman, H. (1986). Psychology. New York: Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kailash, (1997). Human ecological stress and demographic decline: a case of Negritos of Andamans. Indian Journal of Social Work, 58(3), 382–402.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Teall, B. (2000). Using solution-oriented interventions in an ecological frame: a case illustration. Social Work in Education, 22(1), 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Smith, S. (1999). “Now that mom is the Lord’s arms, I just have to live the way she taught me”: reflections on an elderly, African American mother’s death. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 32(2), 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jory, B., & Anderson, D. (1999). Intimate justice II: fostering mutuality, reciprocity, and accommodation in therapy for psychological abuse. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 25(3), 349–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Beverly, C. (1989). Treatment issues for black, alcoholic clients. Social Casework, 70(6), 370–374.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Green, R., & Ephross, P. (1991). Human behavior theory and social work practice. New York: DeGruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mackey, R., & O’Brien, B. (1999). Adaptation in lasting marriages. Families in Society, 80(6), 587–596.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schwartz, A. (1999). Americanization and cultural preservation in Seattle’s Settlement House: a Jewish adaptation to the Anglo-American model of settlement work. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 26(3), 25–47.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Erwin, E., & Kipness, N. (1997). Fostering democratic values in inclusive early childhood settings. Early Childhood Education Journal, 25(1), 57–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Monteiro, A. (2000). Being an African in the world: the Du Boisian epistemology. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 568, 220–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Iida, K. (2000). Globalization and human rights: conversion of intellectual paradig(m). Japanese Journal of Social Services, 2, 87–100.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Holton, R. (2000). Globalization’s cultural consequences. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 570, 140–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Barak, M. (2000). The inclusive workplace: an ecosystems approach to diversity management. Social Work, 45(4), 339–352.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Park, S., & Green, C. (2000). Is transracial adoption in the best interest of ethnic minority children?: questions concerning legal and scientific interpretations of a child’s best interests. Adoption Quarterly, 3(4), 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Digger [pseud.](2009). Vicente Fox: illegal aliens ‘doing jobs that not even blacks want to do.’ http://www.diggersrealm.com/mt/archives/001031.html. Accessed 14 June 2009.

  36. Naisbitt, J. (1982) Megatrends: ten new directions transforming our lives. New York: Warner Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald E Hall .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hall, R.E. (2010). Conclusion: Diversity in the Future. In: An Historical Analysis of Skin Color Discrimination in America. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5505-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics