Abstract
Having (re)conceptualised and operationalised “familiness” and entrepreneurial processes in the last chapter, I shall now turn to the design of the research. This chapter, therefore, will outline the methods used in this research with relation to the data collection and analysis. My main objective in this chapter is to justify and make sense of my selection of these research methods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In choosing this specific region for the fieldwork, accessibility was an important consideration, while other rationales will be discussed in more detail in the next chapter.
- 2.
I lived, studied, and worked in business in eastern China, until early 2004.
- 3.
By using the selection criteria as stated above, some businesses, based on the initial visit, were less relevant to the purpose of this research, being either not in their second generation or not entrepreneurial. These businesses were taken off the case list, replaced by others which were approached, assessed, and selected.
- 4.
This emphasis was very helpful for increasing the interest and a subtle sense of responsibility of the participants, particularly of the owner-managers.
- 5.
In practice, such paperwork cast a potential shadow on the interviews by actually arousing the participant’s alertness from the outset. I then had to continue with topics of a “casual” nature, such as personal and family experiences, and even current events at both national and international levels, to moderate the participant’s nervousness after signing the documents.
- 6.
It is common practices in China that small to medium-sized private enterprises deliberately process their financial statements and operational records, for tax purposes for instance, so that publicly accessible figures are different from their actual performance.
References
Boruch, R., & Foley, E. (2000). The honestly experimental society. In L. Bickman (Ed.), Validity and social experimentation: Donald Campbell’s legacy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bouma, G. (2000). The research process (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.
Bryman, A. (2008). Of methods and methodology. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 3(2), 159–168.
Bryman, A., & Cassell, C. (2006). The research interview: A reflexive perspective. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 1(1), 41–55.
Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2003). Business research: A practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Douglas, S. P., & Craig, C. S. (2007). Collaborative and iterative translation: An alternative approach to back translation. Journal of International Marketing, 15(1), 30–43.
Durkheim, É. (1982). The rules of sociological method: Les règles de la méthode sociologique (W. D. Halls, Trans.). New York, NY: The Free Press. (Original work published in 1895).
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.
Ferguson, P. M., Ferguson, D. L., & Taylor, S. J. (Eds.). (1992). Interpreting disability: A qualitative reader. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Ghauri, P., & Grønhaug, K. (2005). Research methods in business studies (3rd ed.). London: Prentice Hall.
Harkness, J. A. (2003). Questionnaire translation. In J. A. Harkness, F. J. R. van de Vijver & P. P. Mohler (Eds.), Cross-cultural survey methods. New York, NY: Wiley.
Heck, R. K. Z., Hoy, F., Poutziouris, P. Z., & Steier, L. P. (2008). Emerging paths of family entrepreneurship research. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(3), 317–330.
Jankowicz, A. (1992). Business research projects for students. London: Chapman and Hall.
Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602–611.
Keats, D. M. (2000). Interviewing. Sydney, NSW: University of New South Wales Press.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Locke, L. F., Spirduso, W. W., & Silverman, S. J. (1987). Proposals that work: A guide for planning dissertations and grant proposals (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Marschan-Piekkari, R., & Reis, C. (2004). Language and languages in cross-cultural interviewing. In R. Marschan-Piekkari & C. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for international business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Marshal, C., & Rossman, G. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Morse, J. M., & Richards, L. (2002). Read me first: A user’s guide to qualitative methods. London: Sage.
Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Ragin, C. C., & Becker, H. S. (1989). What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robson, C. (1993). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Oxford: Blackwell.
Rutherford, M. W., Kuratko, D. F., & Holt, D. T. (2008). Examining the link between “familiness” and performance: Can the F-PEC untangle the family business theory jungle? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6), 1089–1109.
Sandelowski, M. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing and Health, 18(2), 179–183.
Sharpiro, D. L., Kierman, B. L., & Courtney, H. G. (2007). Perceived causes and solutions of the translation problem in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 249–266.
Sinickas, A. (2005). Cultural differences and research. Strategic Communication Management, 9(1), 12.
Somekh, B., & Lewin, C. (2005). Research methods in the social sciences. London: Sage.
Taylor, S. T., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
Tellis, W. (1997). Application of a case study methodology. The Qualitative Report, 3(3). Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR3-3/tellis2.html
Temple, B. (2006). Being bilingual: Issues for cross-language research. Journal of Research Practice, 2(2), 161–178.
Welman, C., Kruger, F., & Mitchell, B. (2005). Research methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing: Biographic narrative and semi-structured methods. London: Sage.
Xian, H. (2008). Lost in translation? Language, culture and the roles of translator in cross-cultural management research. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 3(3), 231–245.
Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Applications of case study research (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shi, H.X. (2014). Methods and Methodology. In: Entrepreneurship in Family Business. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 30. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04304-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04304-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04303-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04304-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)