Abstract
The energy consumption of the world has been increasing in a consistent trend. This increment is faster than overall energy supply. The construction of additional power plants is essential to keep up with meeting the growing total energy demand. However, the effects of these power plants on social life and local economy should be considered during the planning stage. In this chapter, a Delphi method integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methodology is proposed to evaluate and to compare power plant alternatives. This approach is based on the fuzzy logarithmic least squares method and performs good solutions under implicit information conditions. The methodology is tested in a case study to find the optimal plant type for Turkey. The numerical results together with conducted sensitivity analysis provide insights on the strength and feasibility of the proposed method.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
International Energy Agency, Key world energy statistics (2007) website http://892www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2007/key_stats_2007.pdf, (2008)
Kahraman C, Kaya I (2010) A fuzzy multi criteria methodology for selection among energy alternatives. Expert Syst Appl 37(9):6270–6281
Beccali M, Cellura M, Mistretta M (2003) Decision making in energy planning: application of the ELECTRE method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology. Renew Energy 28:2063–2087
Burton J, Hubacek K (2007) Is small beautiful? A multicriteria assessment of small-scale energy technology applications in local governments. Energy Policy 35(12):6402–6412
Stagl S (2006) Multicriteria evaluation and public participation: the case of UK energy policy. Land Use Policy 23(1):53–62
Diakoulaki D, Georgiou P, Tourkolias C, Georgopoulou E, Lalas D, Mirasgedis S, Sarafidis Y (2007) A multicriteria approach to identify investment opportunities for the exploitation of the clean development mechanism. Energy Policy 35(2):1088–1099
Kowalski K, Stagl S, Madlener R, Omann I (2009) Sustainable energy futures: methodological challenges in combining scenarios and participatory multi-criteria analysis. Eur J Oper Res 197(3):1063–1074
Begic F, Afgan NH (2007) Sustainability assessment tool for the decision making in selection of energy system – Bosnian case. Energy 32:1979–1985
Aragones BP, Chaparro GF, Pastor FJP, Rodriguez PF (2010) An ANP-based approach for the selection of photovoltaic solar power plant investment projects. Renew Sust Energy Rev 14(1):249–264
San CJR (2011) Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: the Vikor method. Renew Energy 36(2):498–502
Cavallaro F, Ciraolo L (2005) A multicriteria approach to evaluate wind energy plants on an Italian Island. Energy Policy 33:235–244
Haralambopoulos DA, Polatidis H (2003) Renewable energy projects: structuring a multicriteria group decision-making framework. Renew Energy 28(6):961–973
Kaya T, Kahraman C (2011) Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Expert Syst Appl 38(6):6577–6585
Kaya T, Kahraman C (2010) Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: the case of Istanbul. Energy 35(6):2517–2527
Kahraman C, Kaya ˙I, Cebi S (2009) A comparative analysis for multiattribute selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Energy 34(10):1603–1616
Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353
Kwiesielewicz M (1996) The logarithmic least squares and the generalized pseudoinverse in estimating ratios. Eur J Oper Res 93(3):611–619
Wang YM, Elhag TMS, Hua Z (2006) A modified fuzzy logarithmic least squares method for fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Fuzzy Sets Syst 157(23):3055–3071
Sung WC (2001) Application of Delphi method, a qualitative and quantitative analysis, to the health care management. J Healthc Manag 2(2):11–19
Changa CW, Wub CR, Linc HL (2009) Applying fuzzy hierarchy multiple attributes to construct an expert decision making process. Expert Syst Appl 36(4):7363–7368
Abbasbandy S, Asady B (2006) Ranking of fuzzy numbers by sign distance. Inf Sci 176(16):2405–2416
Atilgan B, Azapagic A (2016) Renewable electricity in Turkey: life cycle environmental impacts. Renew Energy 89:649–657
Turan HH, Erbiyik H, Unver U (2017) Utilisation of fuzzy multicriteria method for selection of energy alternatives for Turkey, The 9th international exergy, energy and environment symposium (IEEES-9), pp 407–414
Acknowledgments
This article is the extended version of the earlier work of Turan et al. published in the 9th International Exergy, Energy and Environment Symposium (IEEES-9) Proceedings book with title the Utilisation of Fuzzy Multicriteria Method for Selection of Energy Alternatives for Turkey [23].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Turan, H.H., Unver, U., Erbıyık, H. (2018). An Integrated Fuzzy Multi-criteria Approach for Evaluation of Energy Resources: A Case Study of Turkey. In: Nižetić, S., Papadopoulos, A. (eds) The Role of Exergy in Energy and the Environment. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89845-2_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89845-2_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89844-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89845-2
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)