Skip to main content
Log in

Toward a Constructive Critique of Managerial Agency: MacIntyre’s Contribution to Strategy as Practice

  • Published:
Philosophy of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

MacIntyre’s distinctive version of practice theory has already influenced strategy as practice research but his approach has further relevance to the field. The MacIntyrean approach further focuses attention on joint production as an organization-wide practice that potentially encompasses and integrates sub-organizational practices. It also highlights the way that ordinary organization members engage in modes of praxis in order to integrate productive practices in the service of morally salient, organizational goals, facilitating collaboration and long-term value creation, illustrating how participation in joint production shapes members’ identities beyond that derived from sub-organizational, productive practices. As such, this approach offers new insights into the nature of the praxis, practices, and practitioners that shape processes of strategizing within organizations., This approach also furthers the integration of the practical and critical strands of strategy as practice research and provides insights into the way it can be integrated with other research in strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, P.S. 2001. Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organization Science 12 (2): 215–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P.S. 2005. The evolving object of software development. Organization 12 (3): 401–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P.S. 2015. Community and innovation: from Tönnies to Marx. Organization Studies 36 (4): 445–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P.S. 2019. The 99 percent economy: How democratic socialism can overcome the crises of capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P.S., and C. Heckscher. 2018. Collaboration as an organization design for shared purpose. In Toward Permeable Boundaries of Organizations? Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 57, ed. L. Ringel, P. Hiller, and C. Zietsma, 81–111. Bingley: Emerald Insight.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A.A., and H. Demsetz. 1972. Production, information costs, and economic organization. The American Economic Review 62 (5): 777–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allard-Poesi, F. 2015. Dancing in the dark: Making sense of managerial roles during strategic conversations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3)L 338–350.

  • Ambrosini, V., C. Bowman, and S. Burton-Taylor. 2007. Inter-team coordination activities as a source of customer satisfaction. Human Relations 60 (1): 59–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asher, C.C., J.M. Mahoney, and J.T. Mahoney. 2005. Towards a property rights foundation for a stakeholder theory of the firm. Journal of Management & Governance 9 (1): 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacq, S., and R.V. Aguilera. 2022. Stakeholder governance for responsible innovation: A theory of value creation, appropriation, and distribution. Journal of Management Studies 59 (1): 29–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balogun, J., and G. Johnson. 2005. From intended strategies to unintended outcomes: The impact of change recipient sensemaking. Organization Studies 26 (11): 1573–1601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balogun, J., C. Jacobs, P. Jarzabkowski, S. Mantere, and E. Vaara. 2014. Placing strategy discourse in context: Sociomateriality, sensemaking, and power. Journal of Management Studies 51 (2): 175–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J.B. 1986. Organizational culture: can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review 11 (3): 656–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17 (1): 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J.B. 2018. Why resource-based theory's model of profit appropriation must incorporate a stakeholder perspective. Strategic Management Journal 39 (13): 3305–3325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J.A.Y., and T. Felin. 2013. What are microfoundations? Academy of Management Perspectives 27 (2): 138–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J.B., and M.H. Hansen. 1994. Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 15 (S1): 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beadle, R. 2013. Managerial work in a practice-embodying institution: The role of calling, the virtue of constancy. Journal of Business Ethics 113 (4): 679–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beadle, R., and K. Knight. 2012. Virtue and meaningful work. Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (2): 433–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beadle, R., and G. Moore. 2006. MacIntyre on virtue and organization. Organization Studies 27 (3): 323–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernacchio, C. 2018. Networks of giving and receiving in an organizational context: Dependent rational animals and MacIntyrean business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 28 (4): 377–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernacchio, C. 2019. Pope Francis on conscience, gradualness, and discernment: Adapting Amoris Laetitia for business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 29 (4): 437–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernacchio, C. 2020. Morality Between taboo and ideology: Reading MacIntyre as a post-marxist. Rethinking Marxism 32 (2): 207–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernacchio, C. 2021. Realism, democratic accountability, and neo-aristotelianism: reading MacIntyre as a political realist. Acta Philosophica 30 (2): 323–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernacchio, C., N. Foss, and S. Lindenberg. 2022. The Virtues of Joint Production: Ethical Foundations for Collaborative Organization. Academy of Management Review, forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0389.

  • Besharov, M.L., and R. Khurana. 2015. In Institutions and Ideals: Philip Selznick’s Legacy for Organizational Studies, vol. 44, ed. S. Matthew and Kraatz, 53–88. Bingley: Emerald Insight.

  • Birkinshaw, J., N.J. Foss, and S. Lindenberg. 2014. Combining purpose with profits. MIT Sloan Management Review 55 (3): 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, M.M., and L.A. Stout. 1999. A team production theory of corporate law. Virginia Law Review 85 (2): 248–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosse, D.A., and R.A. Phillips. 2016. Agency theory and bounded self-interest. Academy of Management Review 41 (2): 276–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridoux, F., and J.W. Stoelhorst. 2022. Stakeholder governance: Solving the collective action problems in joint value creation. Academy of Management Review 47 (2): 214–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brielmaier, C., and M. Friesl. 2021. Pulled in all directions: Open strategy participation as an attention contest. Strategic Organization, 14761270211034515.

  • Burgelman, R.A., S.W. Floyd, T. Laamanen, S. Mantere, E. Vaara, and R. Whittington. 2018. Strategy processes and practices: Dialogues and intersections. Strategic Management Journal 39 (3): 531–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T. 1995. Explanation and understanding: Selected writings, 1944–1980. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

  • Burns, T. 2016. The BBC: Public institution and private world. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C., S. R. Clegg, and M. Kornberger. 2008. So! apbox: editorial essays: Strategy as practice? Strategic Organization, 6 (1): 83–99.

  • Chia, R., and R. Holt. 2006. Strategy as practical coping: A Heideggerian perspective. Organization Studies 27 (5): 635–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chia, R., and B. MacKay. 2007. Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: Discovering strategy in the logic of practice. Human Relations 60 (1): 217–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chia, R., and A. Rasche. 2015. Epistemological alternatives for researching Strategy as Practice: Building and dwelling worldviews. In Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice, ed. Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L, Seidl, D. and Vaara, E. 2nd edition, 44–57. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Coff, R., and J. Raffiee. 2015. Toward a theory of perceived firm-specific human capital. Academy of Management Perspectives 29 (3): 326–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couch, R., and C. Bernacchio. 2020. The virtues of equality and dissensus: MacIntyre in a dialogue with Rancière and Mouffe. Journal of Business Ethics 164 (4): 633–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, G., and S. Proctor. 2005. The Antecedents of Middle Managers Strategic Contribution: The Case of a Professional Bureaucracy. Journal of Management Studies 42 (7): 1325–1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M., and J. G. March. [1963] 1992. A behavioral theory of the firm, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.

  • Detert, J.R., and E.A. Bruno. 2017. Workplace courage: Review, synthesis, and future agenda for a complex construct. Academy of Management Annals 11 (2): 593–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericson, M.M. 2018. Moral Human Agency in Business: A Missing Dimension in Strategy as Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ezzamel, M., and H. Willmott. 2008. Strategy as discourse in a global retailer: A supplement to rationalist and interpretive accounts. Organization Studies 29 (2): 191–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezzamel, M., H. Willmott, and F. Worthington. 2001. Power, control and resistance in ‘the factory that time forgot’. Journal of Management Studies 38 (8): 1053–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M.S. 2000. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science 11 (6): 611–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M.S. 2004. Resources in emerging structures and processes of change. Organization Science 15 (3): 295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felin, T. 2012. Cosmologies of capability, markets and wisdom of crowds: Introduction and comparative agenda. Managerial and Decision Economics 33 (5–6): 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felin, T., and W. Hesterly. 2007. The knowledge-based view, nested heterogeneity, and new value creation: Philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge. Academy of Management Review 32: 195–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felin, T., S. Kauffman, and T. Zenger. 2021. Resource origins and search. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N.J. 2011. Invited editorial: Why micro-foundations for resource-based theory are needed and what they may look like. Journal of Management 37 (5): 1413–1428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N.J., and S. Lindenberg. 2012. Teams, team motivation, and the theory of the firm. Managerial and Decision Economics 33 (5–6): 369–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education 4 (1): 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., and P. Moran. 1996. Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review 21 (1): 13–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C.B., S.C. Gibson, and Q. Webster. 2021. Expanding our resources: Including community in the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management 47 (7): 1878–1898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gjerde, S., and M. Alvesson. 2020. Sandwiched: Exploring role and identity of middle managers in the genuine middle. Human Relations 73 (1): 124–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, M.A. 2008. Beyond constraint: How institutions enable identities: 3-430. In The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 41. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.

  • Gond, J.P., L. Cabantous, N. Harding, and M. Learmonth. 2016. What do we mean by performativity in organizational and management theory? The uses and abuses of performativity. International Journal of Management Reviews 18 (4): 440–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, A. 2016. Knowledge-intensive work and the (re) emergence of democratic governance. Academy of Management Perspectives 30 (2): 167–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (S2): 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A.M. 2012. Leading with meaning: Beneficiary contact, prosocial impact, and the performance effects of transformational leadership. Academy of Management Journal 55 (2): 458–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A.M., and S.V. Patil. 2012. Challenging the norm of self-interest: Minority influence and transitions to helping norms in work units. Academy of Management Review 37 (4): 547–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J.S., D.A. Bosse, and R.A. Phillips. 2010. Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 31 (1): 58–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R.E., E. Gambeta, C.D. Green, and T.X. Li. 2018. Is my firm-specific investment protected? Overcoming the stakeholder investment dilemma in the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review 43 (2): 284–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard-Grenville, J., M.L. Metzger, and A.D. Meyer. 2013. Rekindling the flame: Processes of identity resurrection. Academy of Management Journal 56 (1): 113–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalonen, K., H. Schildt, and E. Vaara. 2018. Strategic concepts as micro-level tools in strategic sensemaking. Strategic Management Journal 39 (10): 2794–2826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P. 2003. Strategic practices: An activity theory perspective on continuity and change. Journal of Management studies 40 (1): 23–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P. 2004. Strategy as practice: recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use. Organization Studies 25 (4): 529–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P. 2005. Strategy as practice: An activity based approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P., M. Kavas, and E. Krull. 2021. It’s Practice. But is it Strategy? Reinvigorating strategy-as-practice by rethinking consequentiality. Organization Theory, 2: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211029665.

  • Jarzabkowski, P., and R. Whittington. 2008. Hard to disagree, mostly. Strategic Organization 6 (1): 101–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P., J. Balogun, and D. Seidl. 2007. Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective. Human Relations 60 (1): 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T.M., J.S. Harrison, and W. Felps. 2018. How applying instrumental stakeholder theory can provide sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 43 (3): 371–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, B.G. 2015. Organizational actors, character, and Selznick’s theory of organizations. In Institutions and ideals: Philip Selznick’s legacy for organizational studies. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, P.G., J.T. Mahoney, A.M. McGahan, and C.N. Pitelis. 2012. Who is in charge? A property rights perspective on stakeholder governance. Strategic Organization 10 (3): 304–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, K. (1996) Revolutionary Aristotelianism. Contemporary Political Studies, 2: 885–896.

  • Knights, D. and G. Morgan, 1991. Corporate strategy, organizations, and subjectivity: A critique. Organization Studies, 12(2): 251–273.

  • Koerner, M.M. 2014. Courage as identity work: Accounts of workplace courage. Academy of Management Journal 57 (1): 63–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohtamäki, M., R. Whittington, E. Vaara, and R. Rabetino. 2021. Making connections: Harnessing the diversity of strategy-as‐practice research. International Journal of Management Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouamé, S., and A. Langley. 2018. Relating microprocesses to macro-outcomes in qualitative strategy process and practice research. Strategic Management Journal 39 (3): 559–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornberger, M., and S. Clegg. 2011. Strategy as performative practice: The case of Sydney 2030. Strategic Organization 9 (2): 136–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornberger, M., R.E. Meyer, and M.A. Höllerer. 2021. Exploring the long-term effect of strategy work: The case of Sustainable Sydney 2030. Urban Studies 58 (16): 3316–3334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, W., I. Clarke, and R. Wodak. 2014. Micro-level discursive strategies for constructing shared views around strategic issues in team meetings. Journal of Management Studies 51 (2): 265–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laine, P.M., and E. Vaara. 2007. Struggling over subjectivity: A discursive analysis of strategic development in an engineering group. Human Relations 60 (1): 29–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A.N.N., C. Smallman, H. Tsoukas, and A.H. Van de Ven. 2013. Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal 56 (1): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBar, M. 2021. Equality of Authority as the Aristotelian Common Good. The Journal of Value Inquiry 55 (3): 399–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S., and N. Foss. 2011. Managing joint production motivation: The role of goal-framing and governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Review 36: 500–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, J., W. Ocasio, and C. Jones. 2012. Vocabularies and vocabulary structure: A new approach linking categories, practices, and institutions. Academy of Management Annals 6 (1): 41–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. 1998a. Whose justice? Which rationality? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.

  • MacIntyre, A. 1998b. Social science methodology as the ideology of bureaucratic authority.”. In The MacIntyre reader, ed. K. Knight, 53–68. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. 1990. Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry Encyclopedia, Genealogy and Tradition. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. 1999. Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues. Chicago and LaSalle: Open Court Publishing. Chicago and LaSalle: Open Court Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. 2007. After virtue: A study in moral theory, 3rd ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. 2011. Where we were, where we are, where we need to be. In Virtue and politics, ed. P. Blackledge and K. Knight, 307–334. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. 2016. Ethics in the conflicts of modernity: An essay on desire, practical reasoning, and narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, S., and C. Hardy. 2009. Discourse and deinstitutionalization: The decline of DDT. Academy of Management Journal 52 (1): 148–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J.T. 2012. Toward a stakeholder theory of strategic management. In Towards a new theory of the firm, 153–182. Bilbao: BBVA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantere, S. 2008. Role expectations and middle manager strategic agency. Journal of Management Studies 45 (2): 294–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantere, S. 2013. What is organizational strategy? A language-based view. Journal of Management Studies 50 (8): 1408–1426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantere, S., and E. Vaara. 2008. On the problem of participation in strategy: A critical discursive perspective. Organization Science 19 (2): 341–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., and H. A. Simon. [1958] 1993. Organizations, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.

  • Mayer, C. 2021. The Future of the Corporation and the Economics of Purpose. Journal of Management Studies 58 (3): 887–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGahan, A.M. 2021. Integrating insights from the resource-based view of the firm into the new stakeholder theory. Journal of Management 47 (7): 1734–1756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, D. 2013. Vocational virtue ethics: Prospects for a virtue ethic approach to business. Journal of Business Ethics 116 (2): 283–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. 1992. Managerial Dilemmas: The political economy of hierarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. 2002. On the implications of the practice-institution distinction: MacIntyre and the application of modern virtue ethics to business. Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (1): 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. 2012. Virtue in business: Alliance Boots and an empirical exploration of MacIntyre’s conceptual framework. Organization Studies 33 (3): 363–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. 2017. Virtue at work: Ethics for individuals, managers, and organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Narduzzo, A., E. Rocco, and M. Warglien. 2000. Talking about routines in the field. In The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities, ed. G. Dosi, R.R. Nelson, and S.G. Winter, 27–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J. 2000. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science 11 (4): 404–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. 2009. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Peteraf, M.A., and J.B. Barney. 2003. Unraveling the resource-based tangle. Managerial and Decision Economics 24 (4): 309–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, N., G. Sewell, and S. Jaynes. 2008. Applying critical discourse analysis in strategic management research. Organizational Research Methods 11 (4): 770–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regnér, 2003 P. Regnér (2003) Strategy creation in the periphery: Inductive versus deductive strategy making. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1): 57–82.

  • Regnér, P. 2008. Strategy-as-practice and dynamic capabilities: Steps towards a dynamic view of strategy. Human Relations 61 (4): 565–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regnér, P. 2015. Relating strategy as practice to the resource-based view, capabilities perspectives and the micro-foundations approach. In Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice: 301–316.

  • Rhodes, D.P., and M.T. Lysaught. 2020. Whose revolution? Which future? The legacy of Alasdair MacIntyre for a radical pedagogy in virtue. Expositions 14 (1): 97–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouleau, L. 2013. Strategy-as-practice research at a crossroads. M@ n@ gement 16 (5): 574–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouleau, L., and J. Balogun. 2011. Middle managers, strategic sensemaking, and discursive competence. Journal of Management Studies 48 (5): 953–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R.M., V. Huta, and E.L. Deci. 2008. Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies 9 (1): 139–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvato, C. 2003. The role of micro-strategies in the engineering of firm evolution. Journal of Management Studies 40 (1): 83–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, J., and H. Tsoukas. 2011. Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality. Academy of Management Review 36 (2): 338–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, T. 1998. What we owe to each other. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A.G., and G. Palazzo. 2007. Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review 32 (4): 1096–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A.G., and C. Voegtlin. 2020. Corporate governance for responsible innovation: Approaches to corporate governance and their implications for sustainable development. Academy of Management Perspectives 34 (2): 182–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P., ed. 2011. Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. New Orleans: Quid Pro Books.

  • Sillince, J., and F. Mueller. 2007. Switching strategic perspective: The reframing of accounts of responsibility. Organization Studies 28 (2): 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sison, A.J.G., and J. Fontrodona. 2012. The common good of the firm in the Aristotelian-Thomistic tradition. Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (2): 211–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smets, M., R. Greenwood, and M. Lounsbury. 2015. An institutional perspective on strategy as practice. In The Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice, 2nd edition, 283–300.

  • Splitter, V., P. Jarzabkowski, and D. Seidl. 2021. Middle managers’ struggle over their subject position in Open Strategy processes. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoelhorst, J.W. 2021. Value, rent, and profit: A stakeholder resource-based theory. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stout, L.A. 2012. The shareholder value myth: How putting shareholders first harms investors, corporations, and the public. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. 1985. What is Human Agency? In Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers, vol. 1, 15–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University of Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. 1994. A partial response to my critics. In After MacIntyre: Critical perspectives on the work of Alasdair MacIntyre, ed. J. Horton and S. Mendus, 16–43. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J., G. Pisano, and A. Shuen. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal 18 (7): 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J. 2007. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 28 (13): 1319–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.D. [1967]. 2003. Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. Milton Park: Routledge.

  • Tsoukas, H. 1996. The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal 17 (S2): 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. 2015. Making strategy: meta-theoretical insights from Heideggerian phenomenology. In Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice, ed D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, and E. Vaara, 2nd edition, 58–77. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Tsoukas, H. 2018a. Strategy and virtue: Developing strategy-as-practice through virtue ethics. Strategic Organization 16 (3): 323–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. 2018b. Praxis, character, and competence: From a behavioral to a communitarian view of the firm. In Behavioral Strategy in Perspective, ed. M. Augier, C. Fang, and V.P. Rindova, 181–194. West Yorkshire: Bingley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (1): 35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaara, E. 2010. Taking the linguistic turn seriously: Strategy as a multifaceted and interdiscursive phenomenon. In The globalization of strategy research. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaara, E., and R. Whittington. 2012. Strategy-as-practice: Taking social practices seriously. Academy of Management Annals 6 (1): 285–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaara, E., V. Sorsa, and P. Pälli. 2010. On the force potential of strategy texts: a critical discourse analysis of a strategic plan and its power effects in a city organization. Organization 17 (6): 685–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Ende, L., and A. Van Marrewijk. 2018. The point of no return: Ritual performance and strategy making in project organizations. Long Range Planning 51 (3): 451–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wijk, J., W. Stam, T. Elfring, C. Zietsma, and F. Den Hond. 2013. Activists and incumbents structuring change: The interplay of agency, culture, and networks in field evolution. Academy of Management Journal 56 (2): 358–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hulst, M., and H. Tsoukas. 2021. Understanding extended narrative sensemaking: How police officers accomplish story work. Organization. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084211026878.

  • Von Krogh, G., S. Haefliger, S. Spaeth, and M.W. Wallin. 2012. Carrots and rainbows: Motivation and social practice in open source software development. MIS Quarterly 36 (2): 649–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H.C., and J.B. Barney. 2006. Employee incentives to make firm-specific investments: Implications for resource-based theories of corporate diversification. Academy of Management Review 31 (2): 466–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H.C., J. He, and J.T. Mahoney. 2009. Firm-specific knowledge resources and competitive advantage: the roles of economic‐and relationship‐based employee governance mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal 30 (12): 1265–1285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G.R. 2006. Virtue in organizations: Moral identity as a foundation for moral agency. Organization Studies 27 (3): 341–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, M., and J. Koch. 2018. Strategy as staged performance: A critical discursive perspective on keynote speeches as a genre of strategic communication. Strategic Management Journal 39 (3): 639–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westley, F.R. 1990. Middle managers and strategy: Microdynamics of inclusion. Strategic Management Journal 11 (5): 337–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, R. 1996. Strategy as practice. Long Range Planning 29 (5): 731–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, R. 2018. Greatness takes practice: On practice theory’s relevance to “Great Strategy. Strategy Science 3 (1): 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, R. 2019. Opening strategy: Professional strategists and practice change, 1960 to today. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H. 1997. Rethinking management and managerial work: Capitalism, control, and subjectivity. Human Relations 50 (11): 1329–1359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeoman, R. 2014. Conceptualising meaningful work as a fundamental human need. Journal of Business Ethics 125 (2): L.235-L251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zietsma, C., and T.B. Lawrence. 2010. Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Administrative Science Quarterly 55 (2): 189–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zingales, L. 2000. In search of new foundations. The Journal of Finance 55 (4): 1623–1653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zlatev, J. J. and Rogers, T. 2020. Returnable reciprocity: Returnable gifts are more effective than unreturnable gifts at promoting virtuous behaviors. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 161: 74–84.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caleb Bernacchio.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no conflicts of interests to report.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bernacchio, C. Toward a Constructive Critique of Managerial Agency: MacIntyre’s Contribution to Strategy as Practice. Philosophy of Management 22, 539–561 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-023-00229-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-023-00229-4

Keywords

Navigation