Abstract
Much of the discussion in favor of simplicity of legal rules and against complex regulation is rooted in economically developed countries with strong state capacity. With economic development and state capacity comes the presumption that complex rules will be enforced. Therefore, analysis focuses on the administrative and error costs, and the unintended consequences of complex rules that are enforced. This paper argues that the Epsteinian insight is even more relevant to the developing world where countries often lack enough state capacity to even take on simple governance tasks. Developing countries often have less than 20 percent of the state capacity of developed countries. However, this does not mean they limit the regulatory structure to a fifth of the tasks. Under-enforcement or non-enforcement of complex rules imposes different costs and unintended consequences on society. Using examples from India, this paper highlights problems of enforcement swamping, deadweight loss, and corruption arising from the under-enforcement of complex rules. To avoid these problems, the paper concludes that a fortiori less developed countries should favor simple rules.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The World Bank has recently released the findings of the investigation into irregularities in the Doing Business 2018 and 2020 reports (Machen et al., 2021) on the allegations that the rankings of countries like China and Saudi Arabia (2018) and Azerbaijan and UAE (2020) were manipulated in 2018–2020 for political reasons. We use data prior to any alleged manipulation and our results do not depend on Azerbaijan, China, Saudi Arabia and UAE.
The Minimum Wages Act, 1948; The Payment of Wages Act, 1936; The Payment of Bonus Act, 1965; The Equal Remuneration Act, 1976; The Trade Unions Act, 1926; The Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; The Weekly Holidays Act, 1942; The Factories Act, 1948; The Plantation Labour Act, 1951; The Mines Act, 1952; The Building and Other Constructions Workers’ (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996; The Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961; The Beedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act, 1966; The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; The Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976; The Sales Promotion Employees (Conditions of Service) Act, 1976; The Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979; The Cine Workers and Cinema Theatre Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act, 1981; The Dock Workers (Safety, Health and Welfare) Act, 1986; The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986; The Working Journalists and Other Newspapers Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955; The Working Journalists (Fixation of rates of Wages) Act, 1958; The Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923; The Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; The Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948; The Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; The Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; The Unorganized Workers’ Social Security Act, 2008; The Building and Other Construction Workers Cess Act, 1996; The Mica Mines Labour Welfare Fund Act, 1946; The Cine Workers Welfare (Cess) Act, 1981; The Cine Workers Welfare Fund Act, 198; The Limestone and Dolomite Mines Labour Welfare Fund Act, 1972; The Iron Ore Mines, Manganese Ore Mines and Chrome Ore Mines Labour Welfare (Cess)Act, 1976; The Iron Ore Mines, Manganese Ore Mines and Chrome Ore Mines Labor Welfare Fund Act,1976; The Beedi Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1976; The Beedi Workers Welfare Fund Act, 1976; The Labour Laws (Exemption from Furnishing Returns and Maintaining Registers by Certain Establishments) Act, 1988; The Employment Exchange (Compulsory Notification of Vacancies) Act, 1959. In a recent attempt to streamline labor laws the Indian Parliament consolidated 29 labor statutes into 4 labor codes, but keeping the content largely the same.
The scene can be found https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnbNcQlzV-4.
References
Acemoglu, D., Moscona, J., & Robinson, J. A. (2016). State capacity and american technology: Evidence from the nineteenth century. American Economic Review, 106(5), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161071
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2020). The narrow corridor: States, societies, and the fate of liberty. Penguin Books.
Adams, H. C. (1887). Relation of the State to industrial action. Publications of the American Economic Association, 1(6), 7–85.
Andrews Matt, Lant Pritchett, Michael Woolcock (2017) Building State Capability: Evidence, Analysis, Action. 1 edition. Oxford ; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169–217.
Bertrand, M., Djankov, S., Hanna, R., & Mullainathan, S. (2007). Obtaining a driver’s license in India: An experimental approach to studying corruption*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(4), 1639–1676. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2007.122.4.1639
Bhagwati, J. N., & Desai, P. (1970). India: Planning for Industrialization: Industrialization and Trade Policies Since 1951. Oxford University Press.
Bogart, D., & Richardson, G. (2009). Making property productive: Reorganizing rights to real and equitable estates in Britain, 1660–1830. European Review of Economic History, 13(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1361491609002433
Chatterjee, P. (2022, forthcoming). The truths and lies Of nationalism: As narrated by Charvak. State University of New York Press.
Chong, A., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2014). Letter grading government efficiency. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12(2), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12076
Choutagunta, A., Manish, G. P., & Rajagopalan, S. (2021). Battling COVID-19 with dysfunctional federalism: Lessons from India. Southern Economic Journal, 87(4), 1267–1299. https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12501
“Criminal Revision No. 1379 of 2019, Additional Sessions Judge-8.” Sept. 17. Jaipur Metropolitan.
De, R. (2018). A People’s constitution: The everyday life of law in the Indian Republic (Illustrated). Princeton University Press.
Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation of entry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302753399436
Elert, N., Henrekson, M., & Sanders, M. (2019). The entrepreneurial society: A reform strategy for the European Union. International Studies in Entrepreneurship. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59586-2
Epstein, R. A. (1995). Simple rules for a complex World (Revised). Harvard University Press.
ET Bureau. 2019. “30% Driving Licences in India Are Fake: Nitin Gadkari.” The Economic Times, July 16, 2019. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/30-driving-licences-in-india-are-fake-nitin-gadkari/articleshow/70237767.cms?from=mdr.
Geloso, Vincent, Michael Makovi. (2020). State Capacity and the Post Office: Evidence from 19th Century Quebec. SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3526153.
Glaeser, E. L., & Shleifer, A. (2003). The rise of the regulatory state. Journal of Economic Literature, 41(2), 401–425.
Hanson, J. K., & Sigman, R. (2021). Leviathan’s latent dimensions: Measuring State capacity for comparative political research. The Journal of Politics, 83(4), 1495–1510. https://doi.org/10.1086/715066
Jayal, N. G. (2013). Citizenship and its discontents: An Indian history. Harvard University Press.
Johnson, N. D., & Koyama, M. (2017). States and economic growth: Capacity and constraints. Explorations in Economic History, 64, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2016.11.002
Joshi, V. (2017). India’s long road: The search for prosperity (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
Kleiman, M. A. R. (1993). Enforcement swamping: A positive-feedback mechanism in rates of illicit activity. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 17(2), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7177(93)90240-Y
Krishnan, Murali. (2020). “3.7 Million Cases Pending in Courts for over 10 Years: Data.” Hindustan Times. June 29, 2020. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/3-7-million-cases-pending-in-courts-for-over-10-years-data/story-ytI7P0rm5Plwe5r8ubNVyJ.html.
Machen, R. C., Jones, M. T., Varghese, G. P., & Stark, E. L. (2021). Statement on release of investigation into data irregularities in doing business 2018 and 2020. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/statement/2021/09/16/statement-on-release-of-investigation-into-data-irregularities-in-doing-business-2018-and-2020. Accessed 25 Oct 2021.
Matthews, R. (2021). Peace, poverty and betrayal: A new history of British India. Hurst.
Menon, V. P. (1998). The transfer of power in India. Orient Blackswan Private Limited.
North, Douglass C., John Joseph Wallis, Steven B. Webb, and Barry R. Weingast. (2012). In the Shadow of Violence: Politics, Economics, and the Problems of Development. Cambridge University Press.
Prem Chand vs. State of Haryana, Criminal Appeal No. 2255 of 2010, Supreme Court of India. (2010). Supreme Court of India.
Pritchett, Lant. 2009. “Is India a Flailing State?: Detours on the Four Lane Highway to Modernization.” https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4449106.
Rajagopalan, S. (2015). Incompatible institutions: socialism versus constitutionalism in India. Constitutional Political Economy, 26(3), 328–355.
Rajagopalan, S. (2021). Interest groups repairing unconstitutionality: India’s ninth schedule. The Journal of Legal Studies, 50(S2), S151–S178.
Rajagopalan, S., & Tabarrok, A. (2019). Premature imitation and India’s flailing State. The Independent Review, 24(2), 165–186.
Tabarrok, A. (1997). A simple model of crime waves, riots, and revolutions. Atlantic Economic Journal, 25(3), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298409
Teicher, Julian, and Stuart G. Svensen. 1997. “The Nature and Consequences of Labour Market Deregulation in Australasia.” In . https://research.monash.edu/en/publications/the-nature-and-consequences-of-labour-market-deregulation-in-aust-2.
Yeung, Jessie. 2019. “1 in 2 Indians Paid a Bribe at Least Once in the Past Year, Survey Finds.” CNN Digital. November 28, 2019. https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/27/asia/india-corruption-bribe-intl-hnk-scli/index.html.
Funding
Shruti Rajagopalan is a Fellow at the Classical Liberal Institute at the New York University School of Law, which organized and funded the conference where an earlier version of this paper was presented.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Confict of interest
The authors declared that there is no confict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rajagopalan, S., Tabarrok, A. Simple rules for the developing world. Eur J Law Econ 52, 341–362 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-021-09716-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-021-09716-3