Abstract
The UK accountancy industry has traded upon its professional status as a means of expanding and legitimating its activities. Extensive appeals are made to ethical codes and disciplinary arrangements as part of its claim to professional status. This study examines some recent events relating to audit failures and alleged unprofessional conduct by accountancy firms and their partners in the UK with a view to assessing the validity of the claims to professional status. It concludes that the rhetoric of the claims is belied by the failure/inability of the professional accountancy bodies to take effective action against the offending firms or their partners.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carr-Saunders, A. M. and P. A. Wilson: 1933,The Professions (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
Chartered Association of Certified Accountants: 1984,Professional Independence (ACCA, London).
Chartered Association of Certified Accountants: 1991,Conflicts of Interests (ACCA, London).
Department of Trade and Industry: 1976a,London and Country Securities Limited (HMSO, London).
Department of Trade and Industry: 1976b,E. J. Austin International Limited (HMSO, London).
Department of Trade and Industry: 1977,London Capital Group Limited (HMSO, London).
Department of Trade and Industry: 1978,Court Line Limited (HMSO, London).
Department of Trade and Industry: 1980,The Central Provinces Manganese Ore Company Limited; Data Investments Limited; Vivella Limited (HMSO, London).
Department of Trade and Industry: 1981,Gilgate Holdings Limited; Raybourne Group Limited; Calomfern Limited; Desadean Properties Limited (HMSO, London).
Department of Trade and Industry: 1983,Ramor Investments Limited; Demitron Limited (HMSO, London).
Department of Trade and Industry: 1988,Milbury Plc; Westminster Property Group (HMSO, London).
Department of Trade and Industry: 1991a,Sound Diffusion Plc (HMSO, London).
Department of Trade and Industry: 1991b,Rotaprint Plc (HMSO, London).
Department of Trade and Industry: 1992,The Milford Docks Company (HMSO, London).
Dingwall, R. and P. Lewis: 1983,The Sociology of the Professions (Macmillan, London).
Flint, D.: 1988,Philosophy and Principles of Auditing (Macmillan, London).
Haskell, L.: 1984,The Authority of Experts (Indiana University Press, Bloomington).
Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales: 1977,Report of a Committee under the Chairmanship of the Rt. Hon. Lord Cross of Chelsea, Accountancy, December, 80–86.
Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales: 1979a,Guide to Professional Ethics (ICAEW, London).
Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales: 1979b,Report of the Joint Committee to Consider the Cross Report and Related Matters, Accountancy, June, 124–132.
Johnson, T.: 1977, ‘The Professions in the Class Structure’, in R. Scase (ed.),Industrial Society: Class Cleavage and Control (Allen Unwin, London).
Joint Disciplinary Scheme: 1989,Report and Findings of a Committee of Inquiry in the Matter of Euroflame Holdings Plc (ICAEW, London).
Larson, M. S.: 1977,The Rise of Professionalism (University of California Press, Berkeley).
McNeil, I.: 1992, ‘Auditors Lead the Way to Accountability’,The Observer,34.
Millerson, G.: 1964,The Qualifying Associations (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).
Montagna, P.: 1974,Certified Public Accounting: A Sociological View of a Profession in Change (Scholar Books, Houston).
Previts, G. J.: 1985,The Scope of CPA Services (John Wiley, New York).
Puxty, T.: 1990, ‘The Accountancy Profession in the Class Structure’ in D. Cooper and T. Hopper (eds.),Critical Accountants (MacMillan, London).
Sikka, P., H. Willmott and T. Lowe: 1989, ‘Guardians of Knowledge and Public Interest: Evidence and Issues of Accountability in the UK Accountancy Profession’,Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2(2), 47–71.
Sikka, P. and H. Willmott: 1991, ‘Illuminating the State-Profession Relationship: Some Evidence’,Proceedings of the Third Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Accounting Conference, University of Manchester, July, Vol. 3, No. 8.
Timperley, S. R. and M. Osbaldson: 1975, ‘The Profession-alisation Process: A Study of an Aspiring Occupational Organization’,Sociological Review, 607–627.
Wilding, P.: 1982,Professional Power and Social Welfare (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).
Willmott, H.: 1986, ‘Organising the Profession: A Theoretical and Historical Examination of the Development of the Major Accountancy Bodies in the UK’,Accounting, Organizations and Society 11(6), 555–580.
Willmott, H.: 1990, ‘Serving the Public Interest? A Critical Analysis of a Professional Claim’, in D. J. Cooper and T. Hopper (eds.),Critical Accounts (Macmillan, London).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Austin Mitchell After an early career as a university lecturer he became a television journalist and since 1983 has been a Member of Parliament. He was the Labour Party's Trade and Industry spokesman from 1987–1989. He published a number of books and many articles in the press.
Anthony Puxty has since 1987 been professor of Accounting and Finance at the University of Strathclyde. He has published some seven books and more than seventy papers and articles.
Prem Sikka is a professionally qualified accountant. He is currently a Principal Lecturer at the University of East London. He has published two research monographs and more than seventy five articles.
Hugh Willmott is currently a Senior Lecturer in the Manchester School of Management, having worked previously at the University of Aston and the Copenhagen Business School. He has published seven books and contributed numerous articles to leading management, accounting, finance, and social science journals.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mitchell, A., Puxty, T., Sikka, P. et al. Ethical statements as smokescreens for sectional interests: The case of the UK accountancy profession. J Bus Ethics 13, 39–51 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877153
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877153