Skip to main content
Log in

Ethical statements as smokescreens for sectional interests: The case of the UK accountancy profession

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The UK accountancy industry has traded upon its professional status as a means of expanding and legitimating its activities. Extensive appeals are made to ethical codes and disciplinary arrangements as part of its claim to professional status. This study examines some recent events relating to audit failures and alleged unprofessional conduct by accountancy firms and their partners in the UK with a view to assessing the validity of the claims to professional status. It concludes that the rhetoric of the claims is belied by the failure/inability of the professional accountancy bodies to take effective action against the offending firms or their partners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carr-Saunders, A. M. and P. A. Wilson: 1933,The Professions (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chartered Association of Certified Accountants: 1984,Professional Independence (ACCA, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chartered Association of Certified Accountants: 1991,Conflicts of Interests (ACCA, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry: 1976a,London and Country Securities Limited (HMSO, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry: 1976b,E. J. Austin International Limited (HMSO, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry: 1977,London Capital Group Limited (HMSO, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry: 1978,Court Line Limited (HMSO, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry: 1980,The Central Provinces Manganese Ore Company Limited; Data Investments Limited; Vivella Limited (HMSO, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry: 1981,Gilgate Holdings Limited; Raybourne Group Limited; Calomfern Limited; Desadean Properties Limited (HMSO, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry: 1983,Ramor Investments Limited; Demitron Limited (HMSO, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry: 1988,Milbury Plc; Westminster Property Group (HMSO, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry: 1991a,Sound Diffusion Plc (HMSO, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry: 1991b,Rotaprint Plc (HMSO, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry: 1992,The Milford Docks Company (HMSO, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingwall, R. and P. Lewis: 1983,The Sociology of the Professions (Macmillan, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flint, D.: 1988,Philosophy and Principles of Auditing (Macmillan, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, L.: 1984,The Authority of Experts (Indiana University Press, Bloomington).

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales: 1977,Report of a Committee under the Chairmanship of the Rt. Hon. Lord Cross of Chelsea, Accountancy, December, 80–86.

  • Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales: 1979a,Guide to Professional Ethics (ICAEW, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales: 1979b,Report of the Joint Committee to Consider the Cross Report and Related Matters, Accountancy, June, 124–132.

  • Johnson, T.: 1977, ‘The Professions in the Class Structure’, in R. Scase (ed.),Industrial Society: Class Cleavage and Control (Allen Unwin, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Disciplinary Scheme: 1989,Report and Findings of a Committee of Inquiry in the Matter of Euroflame Holdings Plc (ICAEW, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, M. S.: 1977,The Rise of Professionalism (University of California Press, Berkeley).

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, I.: 1992, ‘Auditors Lead the Way to Accountability’,The Observer,34.

  • Millerson, G.: 1964,The Qualifying Associations (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagna, P.: 1974,Certified Public Accounting: A Sociological View of a Profession in Change (Scholar Books, Houston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Previts, G. J.: 1985,The Scope of CPA Services (John Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Puxty, T.: 1990, ‘The Accountancy Profession in the Class Structure’ in D. Cooper and T. Hopper (eds.),Critical Accountants (MacMillan, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikka, P., H. Willmott and T. Lowe: 1989, ‘Guardians of Knowledge and Public Interest: Evidence and Issues of Accountability in the UK Accountancy Profession’,Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 2(2), 47–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikka, P. and H. Willmott: 1991, ‘Illuminating the State-Profession Relationship: Some Evidence’,Proceedings of the Third Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Accounting Conference, University of Manchester, July, Vol. 3, No. 8.

  • Timperley, S. R. and M. Osbaldson: 1975, ‘The Profession-alisation Process: A Study of an Aspiring Occupational Organization’,Sociological Review, 607–627.

  • Wilding, P.: 1982,Professional Power and Social Welfare (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H.: 1986, ‘Organising the Profession: A Theoretical and Historical Examination of the Development of the Major Accountancy Bodies in the UK’,Accounting, Organizations and Society 11(6), 555–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H.: 1990, ‘Serving the Public Interest? A Critical Analysis of a Professional Claim’, in D. J. Cooper and T. Hopper (eds.),Critical Accounts (Macmillan, London).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Austin Mitchell After an early career as a university lecturer he became a television journalist and since 1983 has been a Member of Parliament. He was the Labour Party's Trade and Industry spokesman from 1987–1989. He published a number of books and many articles in the press.

Anthony Puxty has since 1987 been professor of Accounting and Finance at the University of Strathclyde. He has published some seven books and more than seventy papers and articles.

Prem Sikka is a professionally qualified accountant. He is currently a Principal Lecturer at the University of East London. He has published two research monographs and more than seventy five articles.

Hugh Willmott is currently a Senior Lecturer in the Manchester School of Management, having worked previously at the University of Aston and the Copenhagen Business School. He has published seven books and contributed numerous articles to leading management, accounting, finance, and social science journals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mitchell, A., Puxty, T., Sikka, P. et al. Ethical statements as smokescreens for sectional interests: The case of the UK accountancy profession. J Bus Ethics 13, 39–51 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877153

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877153

Keywords

Navigation