Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Combination of the Push-Down and Let-Down Techniques: Mix-Down Approaches

  • Original Article
  • Rhinoplasty
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 11 January 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Rhinoplasty is one of the most widely conducted and challenging types of aesthetic surgical operations, and dorsal hump reduction is a commonly performed aesthetic surgery among Caucasian patients. Dorsal hump resection is traditionally conducted by removing the dorsal nasal bone and cartilage. The push-down and let-down techniques are used for dorsal preservation in dorsal hump reduction operations. Different patients require different approaches to achieve the best results in terms of aesthetic appearance and functionality.

Objectives

In the present research, the author describes two novel approaches that combine the push-down and let-down techniques for appropriate patients.

Methods

The records of 45 patients (40 females and 5 males) were assessed, and those who were eligible for the present approaches were included. The author defined two approaches in which the push-down and let-down techniques were used simultaneously (mix-down methods). All patients included in the study completed the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire before surgery and at their one-year follow-up appointment.

Results

The median ROE scores were 60.1 points before surgery and 92.2 points one year after surgery; this difference was statistically significant (p<0.001).

Conclusions

The present study is the first to demonstrate the beneficial effects of combining the push-down and let-down techniques in a selected patient population. These new approaches will improve both cosmetic and functional outcomes and allow surgeons to choose the best option for patients who are eligible for these mix-down approaches.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. The International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (2017) Cosmetic procedures performed in 2017. Annu ISAPS Int Surv Aesthetic/Cosmetic Proced

  2. The International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (2017) The International Study on Aesthetic/Cosmetic Procedures Performed in 2017. Annu ISAPS Int Surv Aesthetic/Cosmetic Proced 1–18

  3. Alsarraf R (2000) Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery: a review and new directions. Aesthet Plast Surg 24:192–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002660010031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barrett DM, Casanueva F, Wang T (2017) Understanding approaches to the dorsal hump. Facial Plast Surg 33:125–132. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1598033

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cabbarzade C (2019) A new algorithm for hump reduction according to dynamics of dorsal preservation. Aesthet Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chatrath P, De Cordova J, Nouraei SAR et al (2007) Objective assessment of facial asymmetry in rhinoplasty patients. Arch Facial Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.9.3.184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cottle MH (1954) Nasal roof repair and hump removal. AMA Arch Otolaryngol 60:408–414. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1954.00720010420002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cottle MH, Loring RM (1946) Corrective surgery of the external nasal pyramid and the nasal septum for restoration of normal physiology. Ill Med J 90:119–135

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Drumheller GW (1995) The cottle push down operation. Am J Cosmet Surg 12:255–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/074880689501200307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Farshidi F, Sood A, Castiglione CL (2017) Rhinoplasty. Complications in Maxillofacial Cosmetic Surgery: Strategies for Prevention and Management. Springer, Cham, pp 221–228

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goksel A, Saban Y (2019) Open piezo preservation rhinoplasty: a case report of the new rhinoplasty approach. Facial Plast Surg 35(1):113–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hafezi F, Naghibzadeh B, Nouhi A, Yavari P (2010) Asymmetric facial growth and deviated nose: a new concept. Ann Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31819ae02d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huizing EH (1975) Push down of the external nasal pyramid by resection of wedges. Rhinology 13:185–190

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ishida J, Ishida LC, Ishida LH et al (1999) Treatment of the nasal hump with preservation of the cartilaginous framework. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:1729–1735. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199905060-00028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jang YJ, Wang JH, Lee BJ (2008) Classification of the deviated nose and its treatment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2007.46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jobe R (1981) En bloc nasal shift rhinoplasty: An approach to the small crooked nose. Ann Plast Surg 7:120–125. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-198108000-00007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Katira K, Guyuron B (2014) The deviated nose and asymmetric eyebrows: an important trap to avoid. Plast Reconstr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000438067.84408.be

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kosins AM (2020) Expanding indications for dorsal preservation rhinoplasty with cartilage conversion techniques. Aesthet Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaa071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kosins AM, Daniel RK (2020) Decision making in preservation rhinoplasty: A 100 case series with one-year follow-up. Aesthet Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee J, Abdul-Hamed S, Kazei D et al (2020) The first descriptions of dorsal preservation rhinoplasty in the 19th and early- to mid-20th centuries and relevance today. Ear, Nose Throat J. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145561320925572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Montes-Bracchini JJ (2019) Nasal profile hump reduction using the let-down technique. Facial Plast Surg 35:486–491. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1695751

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Neves Pinto RM (1997) On the “let-down” procedure in septorhinoplasty. Rhinology 35:178–180

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nouraei SAR, Pulido MA, Saleh HA (2009) Impact of rhinoplasty on objective measurement and psychophysical appreciation of facial symmetry. Arch Facial Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfacial.2009.33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Öztürk G (2020a) Push-down technique without osteotomy: a new approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 44(3):891–901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01660-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Öztürk G (2019) Scroll ligament preservation and improvement in nasal tip with the room concept. Aesthetic Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01436-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Öztürk G (2020b) New approaches for the let-down technique. Aesthet Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01801-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Öztürk G (2020c) A novel hump reinsertion technique to reconstruct the nasal dorsum. J Craniofac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Patel PN, Abdelwahab M, Most SP (2020) A review and modification of dorsal preservation rhinoplasty techniques. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 22:71–79. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2020.0017

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Robotti E, Chauke-Malinga NY, Leone F (2019) A modified dorsal split preservation technique for nasal humps with minor bony component: a preliminary report. Aesthet Plast Surg 43:1257–1268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01425-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rohrich RJ, Villanueva NL, Small KH, Pezeshk RA (2017) Implications of facial asymmetry in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Saban Y, Daniel RK, Polselli R et al (2018) Dorsal preservation: the push down technique reassessed. Aesthet Surg J 38:117–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Taş S (2019) Dorsal roof technique for dorsum preservation in rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tuncel U, Aydogdu O (2019) The probable reasons of dorsal hump problems following let-down/push-down rhinoplasty and solution proposals. Plast Reconstr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Xia TY, Punjabi A, Oh JH et al (2020) Updated dynamics of rhinoplasty: a review of the literature and comprehensive list of the findings. Aesthet Plast Surg. 44(3):904–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yi JS, Jang YJ (2015) Frequency and characteristics of facial asymmetry in patients with deviated noses. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2015.0388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Güncel Öztürk.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Human or Animal Rights

This study was performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki’s standards for biomedical research on human subjects.

Informed Consent

All participants provided informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article was updated to replace the video file.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

demonstrates the stages of the operation. Supplementary file1 (MP4 46580 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Öztürk, G. Combination of the Push-Down and Let-Down Techniques: Mix-Down Approaches. Aesth Plast Surg 45, 1140–1149 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-02012-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-02012-6

Keywords

Navigation