Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social-psychological Determinants of the Implementation of Green Infrastructure for Residential Stormwater Management

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 20 February 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Climate change effects and increasing levels of imperviousness, cause many urban areas globally to experience larger rainfall runoff volumes that need to be managed to protect property and infrastructure, and avoid environmental pollution. Conventionally engineered, ‘grey’ stormwater infrastructure often is outdated and unable to control these increased runoff volumes. Green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) can complement grey infrastructure, but public land for its installation is limited. Consequently, municipalities often look to residential properties to install GSI at the lot-level. While many studies have been conducted in the engineering aspects of GSI, less is known about what determines residents’ decisions to install GSI on their properties. To help close this knowledge gap, we conducted a survey of social-psychological determinants of residential GSI implementation using the Theory of Planned Behavior as theoretical framework, and analyzing our data with partial least squares path modeling. Results from three neighborhoods of our case study area suggest that residents’ decisions to install GSI largely are determined by social norms and perceived control factors such as available finances and time. However, residents’ beliefs and attitudes toward the effectiveness and attractiveness of GSI did not seem to play a significant role. Neighborhood characteristics including local flooding history did not seem to affect residents’ decisions about GSI installation either. We recommend creation of effective municipal education and outreach programs regarding urban stormwater management that speak to residents’ shared responsibility and options for addressing this issue, as well as creation of financial instruments that provide meaningful subsidies for residential GSI adoption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data used for this research will be made available via Scholars Portal Dataverse.

Change history

References

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (2011) The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections. Psychol Health 26(9):1113–1127

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (2015) The theory of planned behaviour is alive and well, and not ready to retire: a commentary on Sniehotta, Presseau, and Araújo-Soares. Health Psychol Rev 9(2):131–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson BC, Watt WE, Marsalek J, Ng J, Sneyd B (2008) Feasibility of the application of integrated stormwater management for land-restricted lakeside villages: the case study of Portland, Ontario. Can Water Resour J 33(3):295–306

  • Armitage CJ, Conner M (1999) Predictive validity of the theory of planned behaviour: the role of questionnaire format and social desirability. J Community Appl Soc Psych 9:261–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage CJ, Conner M (2001) Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. Brit J Soc Psychol 40(4):471–499

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baker A, Brenneman E, Chang H, McPhillips L, Matsler M (2019) Spatial analysis of landscape and sociodemographic factors associated with green stormwater infrastructure distribution in Baltimore, Maryland and Portland, Oregon. Sci Total Environ 664:461–473

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baptiste AK (2014) “Experience is a great teacher”: citizens’ reception of a proposal for the implementation of green infrastructure as stormwater management technology. Community Dev 45(4):337–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Baptiste AK, Foley C, Smardon R (2015) Understanding urban neighborhood differences in willingness to implement green infrastructure measures: a case study of Syracuse, NY. Landscape Urban Plan 136:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa AE, Fernandes JN, David LM (2012) Key issues for sustainable urban stormwater management. Water Res 46:6787–6798

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle SJ, Tsanis IK, Kanaroglou PS (1998) Developing geographic information systems for land use impact assessment in flooding conditions. J Water Res Plan Man 124(2):89–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Brander KE, Owen KE, Potter KW (2004) Modeled impacts of development type on runoff volume and infiltration performance. J Am Water Resour As 40(4):961–969

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown HL, Bos DG, Walsh CJ, Fletcher TD, RossRakesh S (2016) More than money: how multiple factors influence householder participation in at-source stormwater management. J Environ Plann Man 59(1):79–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumgardner M, Montague I, Wiedenbeck J (2017) Survey response rates in the forest products literature from 2000 to 2015. Wood Fiber Sci 49(1):84–92

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chao Y-L (2012) Predicting people’s environmental behaviour: theory of planned behaviour and model of responsible environmental behaviour. Environ Educ Res 18(4):437–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Chui TFM, Ngai WY (2016) Willingness to pay for sustainable drainage systems in a highly urbanised city: a contingent valuation study in Hong Kong. Water Environ J 30:62–69

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Hamilton (2018) City of Hamilton - Ward 13. Hamilton, ON, https://spatialsolutions.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=4ee9585a8ed04215b82185837971b7c9. Accessed 19 November 2020

  • Coleman S, Hurley S, Rizzo D, Koliba C, Zia A (2018) From the household to watershed: a cross-scale analysis of residential intention to adopt green stormwater infrastructure. Landscape Urban Plan 180:195–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Cote SA, Wolfe SE (2014) Assessing the social and economic barriers to permeable surface utilization for residential driveways in Kitchener. Canada. Environ Practice 16(1):6–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Craggs S (2017) Dundas suffered flooding, mud slides when a full month of rain fell in 1 day. CBC News. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/dundas-flooding-1.4079256. Accessed 1 June 2020

  • Dietz ME, Clausen JC (2008) Stormwater runoff and export changes with development in a traditional and low impact subdivision. J Environ Manage 87:560–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Eanes FR, Zhou X (2020) The role of attitudes, social norms, and perceived behavioral control as factors influencing urban and suburban residential adoption of stormwater best management practices. Environ Manage 65:737–747

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckart K, McPhee Z, Bolisetti T (2017) Performance and implementation of low impact development – a review. Sci Total Environ 607-608:413–432

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Esmail BA, Sulemain L (2020) Analyzing evidence of sustainable urban water management systems: a review through the lenses of sociotechnical transitions. Sustainability 12:4481

    Google Scholar 

  • Faehnle M, Backlund P, Tyrvainen L, Niemela J, Yli-Pelkonen V (2014) How can residents’ experiences inform planning of urban green infrastructure? Case Finland. Landscape Urban Plan 130:171–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiquepron J, Garcia S, Stenger A (2013) Land use impact on water quality: valuing forest services in terms of the water supply sector. J Environ Mange 126:113–121

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein M, Ajzen I (2010) Predicting and changing behavior: the reasoned action approach. Psychology Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeborn JR, Sample DJ, Fox LJ (2012) Residential stormwater: methods for decreasing runoff and increasing stormwater infiltration. J Green Build 7(2):15–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Babin N, Turner AJ, Hoffa CR, Peel S, Prokopy L (2016) Understanding urban-suburban adoption and maintenance of rain barrels. Landscape Urban Plan 153:99–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Cuerva L, Berglund EZ, Rivers III L (2018) An integrated approach to place green infrastructure strategies in marginalized communities and evaluate stormwater mitigation. J Hydrol 559:648–660

  • Gobel P, Stubbe H, Weinert M, Zimmermann J, Fach S, Dierkes C, Kories H, Messer J, Mertsch V, Geiger WF, Coldewey WG (2004) Near natural stormwater management and its effects on the water budget and groundwater surface in urban areas taking account of the hydrogeological conditions. J Hydrol 299:267–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Grothmann T, Reusswig F (2006) People at risk of flooding: why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Nat Hazards 38:101–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair Jr JF, Matthews LM, Matthews RL, Sarstedt M (2017) PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. Int J Multivar Data Anal 1(2):107–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensler J, Sarstedt M (2013) Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Computation Stat 28:565–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman RN, Dailey P, Hopsch S, Ponte RM, Quinn K, Hill EM, Zachry B (2010) An estimate of increases in storm surge risk to property from sea level rise in the first half of the twenty-first century. Weather Clim Soc 2:271–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplowitz MD, Hadlock TD, Levine R (2004) A comparison of web and mail survey response rates. Public Opin Quart 68(1):94–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley M, Koburger A, Dolowitz DP, Medearis D, Nickel D, Shuster W (2013) Perspectives on the use of green infrastructure for stormwater management in Cleveland and Milwaukee. Environ Manage 51:1093–1108

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo MC, Low SC, Henning J, Branas CC (2015) The impact of green stormwater infrastructure installation on surrounding health and safety. Am J Public Health 105(3):114–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim TC (2018) An empirical study of spatial-temporal growth patterns of a voluntary residential green infrastructure program. J Environ Plann Man 61(8):1363–1382

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin I-F, Schaeffer NC (1995) Using survey participants to estimate the impact of nonparticipation. Public Opin Quart 59(2):236–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin N, Emanuel K, Oppenheimer M, Vanmarcke E (2012) Physically based assessment of hurricane surge threat under climate change. Nat Clim Change 2:462–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan J (2014) Using a spreadsheet to model rain barrel efficiency and cost benefit for homeowners. HortTechnology 24(1):156–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Loperfido JV, Noe GB, Jarnagin ST, Hogan DM (2014) Effects of distributed and centralized stormwater best management practices and land cover on urban stream hydrology at the catchment scale. J Hydrol 519:2584–2595

    Google Scholar 

  • Mentens J, Raes D, Hermy M (2006) Green roofs as a tool for solving the rainwater runoff problem in the urbanized 21st century? Landscape Urban Plan 77:217–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles B, Band LE (2015) Green infrastructure stormwater management at the watershed scale: urban variable source area and watershed capacitance. Hydrol Process 29:2268–2274

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne S, Sheeran P, Orbell S (2000) Prediction and intervention in health- related behaviour: a meta-analytic review of protection motivation theory. J Appl Soc Psychol 30:10643

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Municipal Affairs (2020) Provincial policy statement. https://files.ontario.ca/mmah-provincial-policy-statement-2020-accessible-final-en-2020-02-14.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2020

  • Moan SI, Rise J (2011) Predicting intentions not to “drink and drive” using an extended version of the theory of planned behaviour. Accident Anal Prev 43(4):1378–1384

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickel D, Schoenfelder W, Medearis D, Dolowitz DP, Keeley M, Shuster W (2014) German experience in managing stormwater with green infrastructure. J Environ Plann Man 57(3):403–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennino MJ, McDonald RI, Jaffe PR (2016) Watershed-scale impacts of stormwater green infrastructure on hydrology, nutrient fluxes, and combined sewer overflows in the mid-Atlantic region. Sci Total Environ 565:1044–1053

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pennsylvania State University (2017) 6.1 How to use stratified sampling. https://online.stat.psu.edu/stat506_sp20/lesson/6/6.1. Accessed 1 June 2020

  • Pradhananga AK, Davenport MA (2017) Community attachment, beliefs and residents’ civic engagement in stormwater management. Landscape Urban Plan 168:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2013) The R project for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org/ Accessed 1 June 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigdon EE (2012) Rethinking partial least squares path modeling: in praise of simple methods. Long Range Plann 45:341–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg EA, Keys PW, Booth DB, Hartley D, Burkey J, Steinemann AC, Lettenmaier DP (2010) Precipitation extremes and the impacts of climate change on stormwater infrastructure in Washington State. Climatic Change 102:319–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe AA, Rector P, Bakacs M (2016) Survey results of green infrastructure implementation in New Jersey. J Sustain Water Built Environ 2(3):04016001

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez G (2013) PLS Path Modeling with R. Trowchez Editions. Berkeley, 2013. http://www.gastonsanchez.com/PLSPathModelingwithR.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2020

  • Sandberg T, Conner M (2008) Anticipated regret as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behavior: a meta-analysis. Brit J Soc Psychol 47:589–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheeran P (2002) Intention behaviour relations: a conceptual and empirical review. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 12:1–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton DP, Rodie SN, Feehan KA, Franti TG, Pekarek KA, Holm BA (2015) Integrating extension teaching and research for stormwater management education. J Contemp Water Res Educ 156:68–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Schirmer J, Dyer F (2018) A framework to diagnose factors influencing proenvironmental behaviors in water-sensitive urban design. P Natl Acad Sci USA 115(33):E7690–E7699

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sniehotta FF, Presseau J, Araújo-Soares V (2014) Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour. Health Psychol Rev 8(1):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner VK, Jarden K, Jefferson A (2016) Resident perspectives on green infrastructure in an experimental suburban stormwater management program. Cities Environ 9(1):4

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S, Yli-Pelkonen V, Kazmierczak A, Niemela J, James P (2007) Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landscape Urban Plan 81:167–178

  • United Nations [United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division] (2018) World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision, custom data acquired via website. https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html. Accessed 1 June 2020

  • United Nations (2014) World’s population increasingly urban with more than half living in urban areas. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/news/population/world-urbanization-prospects-2014.html. Accessed 1 June 2020

  • Urbonas BR, Roesner LA (1993) Hydrologic design for urban drainage and flood control. In: Maidment DR (ed) Handbook of hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York.

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (2015) What is green infrastructure? https://www.epa.gov/green-infrastructure/what-green-infrastructure. Accessed 1 June 2020

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (2017) Urban runoff: low impact development. https://www.epa.gov/nps/urban-runoff-low-impact-development. Accessed 1 June 2020

  • Venkataramanan V, Lopez D, McCuskey DJ, Kiefus D, McDonald RI, Miller WM, Packman AI, Young SL (2020) Knowledge, attitudes, intentions, and behavior related to green infrastructure for flood management: a systematic literature review. Sci Total Environ 720:137606

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang R, Eckelman MJ, Zimmerman JB (2013) Consequential environmental and economic life cycle assessment of green and grey infrastructures for combined sewer systems. Environ Sci Technol 47:11189–11198

  • Waters D, Watt WE, Marsalek J, Anderson BC (2003) Adaptation of a storm drainage system to accommodate increased rainfall resulting from climate change. J Environ Plann Man 46(5):755–770

    Google Scholar 

  • Wauters E, Bielders C, Poesen J, Govers G, Mathijs E (2010) Adoption of soil conservation practices in Belgium: an examination of the theory of planned behaviour in the agri-environmental domain. Land Use Policy 27:86–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells J (2012) Climate change: How Toronto is adapting to our scary new reality. The Toronto Star. http://www.thestar.com/news/insight/2012/08/19/climate_change_how_toronto_is_adapting_to_our_scary_new_reality.html. Accessed 1 June 2020

  • Wong KK (2013) Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Mark Bull 24:1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia S, Liu J (2014) A belief-based model for characterizing the spread of awareness and its impacts on individuals’ vaccination decisions. J Roy Soc Interface 11:20140013

    Google Scholar 

  • XLSTAT (2017) XLSTAT by Addinsoft. Addinsoft, New York, NY. https://www.xlstat.com/en/news/xlstat-version-2017-1. Accessed 19 November 2020

  • Yang B, Li M (2010) Ecological engineering in a new town development: drainage design in The Woodlands, Texas. Ecol Eng 36:1639–1650

  • Yang B, Li S (2013) Green infrastructure design for stormwater runoff quality: empirical evidence from large watershed-scale community developments. Water 5:2038–2057

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the residents of Dundas for their participation in this study. We are also grateful for the support by staff of the Hamilton Conservation Authority who provided advice in the planning stages of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Planning, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada

    Michael Drescher

  2. Cooperation of the Town of Amherstburg, 271 Sandwich Street South, Amherstburg, ON, N9V 2A5, Canada

    Sarah Sinasac

Authors
  1. Michael Drescher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah Sinasac
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Drescher.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The University of Waterloo Office of Research Ethics has reviewed the entire study. Full ethics clearance has been granted (ORE#21801).

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Drescher, M., Sinasac, S. Social-psychological Determinants of the Implementation of Green Infrastructure for Residential Stormwater Management. Environmental Management 67, 308–322 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01393-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01393-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation