Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How tangible is your prototype? Designing the user and expert interaction

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The only way to create a shared understanding of an idea in the design process is to convert it into a prototype. Since prototypes are in general built by experts and tested by users, we want to discover which materials users like and if experts and users are aligned in this choice in the different design phases. In this experiment, the tested object is an intangible artefact. We gathered qualitative data on how users and experts perceive low fidelity prototypes made of different materials. We found that the sequence of prototyping materials to use for each phase of the design process depends upon the user. The tangibility level of prototypes increases as the design process progresses. Less tangible prototypes works in brainstorming while ones that are more tangible are perfect for the testing phase. In general, prototypes that are more tangible facilitate creativity, interaction and communication, because they allow a direct link between actions and thoughts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Muller, M.J.: Participatory design: the third space in HCI. In: Sears, A., Jacko, J.A. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction: Development Process, pp. 165–185. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Holman, D., et al.: The Design of Organic User Interfaces: Shape, Sketching and Hypercontext. Interact. Comput. 25(2), 133–142 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lafrenière, D., Dayton, T., Muller, M.: Variations of a theme: card-based techniques for participatory analysis and design. In: CHI ’99 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 151–152. ACM, Pittsburgh (1999)

  4. Fischer, X., Coutellier, D.: Editorial. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM) 1(1), 1–4 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kanai, S., Verlinden, J.: Advanced prototyping for human-centered design for information appliances. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM) 3(3), 131–134 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. West, M.A., Farr, J.L. (eds).: Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies. Wiley, Chichester (1991)

  7. Bratteteig, T., Gregory, J.: Understanding design. In: Proceedings of the 24th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia (IRIS 24) (2001)

  8. Muller, M., Kuhn, S.: Special issue on participatory design. Commun. ACM 36(6), 24–28 (1993)

  9. Walker, M., Takayama, L., Landay, J.A.: High-fidelity or low-fidelity, paper or computer? Choosing attributes when testing web prototypes. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. SAGE Publications (2002)

  10. Statler, M., Oliver, D.: Facilitating serious play. The Oxford Handbook on Organizational Decision-Making, pp. 475–494. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)

  11. Kristiansen, P., Hansen, P.H.K., Nielsen, L.M.: Articulation of tacit and complex knowledge. In: 13th International Workshop of the IFIP WG 5.7 SIG (2009)

  12. Bødker, S., Grønbæk, K.: Design in action: from prototyping by demonstration to cooperative prototyping. In: Design at work. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale (1992)

  13. Coughlan, P., Suri, J.F., Canales, K.: Prototypes as (Design) tools for behavioral and organizational change: a design-based approach to help organizations change work behaviors. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 43(1), 122–134 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leonard, D., Rayport, J.F.: Spark innovation through empathic design. Harv. Bus. Rev. 75, 102–115 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Curtis, G., Vertelney, L.: Storyboards and sketch prototypes for rapid interface visualization. Tutorial 33, CHI’90. 34 (1990)

  16. Nam, T.-J., Park, S., Verlinden, J.: A model to conceptualize interactivity. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM) 3(3), 147–156 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sauer, J., Franke, H., Ruettinger, B.: Designing interactive consumer products: Utility of paper prototypes and effectiveness of enhanced control labelling. Appl. Ergon. 39(1), 71–85 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Filippi, S., Barattin, D.: A selection algorithm for prototyping activities. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM) 8(1), 1–11 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bolchini, D., Pulido, D., Faiola, A.: “Paper in screen” prototyping: an agile technique to anticipate the mobile experience. Interactions 16(4), 29–33 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sauer, J., Sonderegger, A.: The influence of prototype fidelity and aesthetics of design in usability tests: effects on user behaviour, subjective evaluation and emotion. Appl. Ergon. 40(4), 670–677 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Wiley, Chichester (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gabrysiak, G., et al.: How tangible can virtual prototypes be. In: Proceedings of the 8th Design Thinking Research Symposium, Sydney (2010)

  23. Sefelin, R., Tscheligi, M., Giller, V.: Paper prototyping-what is it good for?: a comparison of paper-and computer-based low-fidelity prototyping. In: CHI’03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (2003)

  24. Schulz, K.-P., Geithner, S.: The development of shared understandings and innovation through metaphorical methods such as LEGO Serious Play\(^{{\rm TM}}\) (2011)

  25. Tudor, L.G., et al.: A participatory design technique for high-level task analysis, critique, and redesign: the CARD method. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. SAGE Publications (1993)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Science and Methods for Engineering, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola, 2, 42122 , Reggio, Italy

    Chiara Donati & Matteo Vignoli

Authors
  1. Chiara Donati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matteo Vignoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiara Donati.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Donati, C., Vignoli, M. How tangible is your prototype? Designing the user and expert interaction. Int J Interact Des Manuf 9, 107–114 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-014-0232-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-014-0232-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation