Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An investigation of plagiarism software use and awareness training on English as a foreign language (EFL) students

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plagiarism is often considered as cheating, dishonesty, copying, or moral failing in writing because it is the act of stealing others’ language and ideas without proper citation or paraphrasing. However, this idea is not universally shared because people from different cultural backgrounds are likely to conceptualize plagiarism differently. To fill the gap in teachers’ perceptions and investigate students’ actual plagiaristic behavior, this study aims to detect the extent of plagiarism in students’ English summary writing by adopting plagiarism-detection software, Turnitin. The present study draws on both quantitative and qualitative data to investigate whether discrepancy exists between students’ perceptions of plagiarism and their actual plagiaristic behavior, and whether student behavior changes after their awareness training on plagiarism. The results of this study show that student plagiaristic behavior has changed and the awareness of adoption of plagiarism-detection software significantly has reduced the instances of textual plagiarism. It is thus noted that students who were aware that a plagiarism detection system was in use had lower percentages of plagiarism. However, no obvious relationship is observed between plagiarism awareness and the students’ actual plagiaristic behavior. The implications of these findings on pedagogical practice and future research are discussed and presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abasi, A. R., & Akbari, N. (2008). Are we encouraging patchwriting? Reconsidering the role of the pedagogical context in ESL student writers’ transgressive intertextuality. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babaii, E., & Nejadghanbar, H. (2017). Plagiarism among Iranian graduate students of language studies: Perspectives and causes. Ethics & Behavior, 27(3), 240–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. K., Thornton, B., & Adams, M. (2008). An evaluation of the effectiveness of Turnitin.com as a tool for reducing plagiarism in graduate student term papers. College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal, 4(9), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batane, T. (2010). Turning to Turnitin to fight plagiarism among university students. Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, J. (2012). Plagiarism, intellectual property and teaching of L2 writing. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Borg, E. (2009). Local plagiarism. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(4), 415–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. (2000). How to avoid plagiarism. Retrieved December 12, 2016, from https://Brookes.ac.uk/services/ocsd/2learntch/plagiarism.html.

  • Caval Collaborative Solutions. (2002, September). Victoria vice-chancellors’ electronic plagiarism detection pilot project: Member project report. Melbourne, Australia: Caval Collaborative Solutions.

  • Chien, S. C. (2014). Cultural constructions for plagiarism in student writing: Teachers’ perceptions and responses. Research in the Teaching of English, 49(2), 120–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, P. (1998). Staying out of trouble: Apparent plagiarism and academic survival. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M., & Carroll, J. (2009). Formative feedback within plagiarism education: Is there a role for text-matching software? International Journal for Educational Integrity, 5(2), 58–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Voss, D., & Rosati, A. (2002). It wasn’t me, was it? Plagiarism and the Web. Computers and Composition, 19(2), 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flint, A., Clegg, S., & Macdonald, R. (2006). Exploring staff perceptions of student plagiarism. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 30, 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh, E. (2013). Plagiarism behavior among undergraduate students in hospitality and tourism education. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 13, 307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, N. (2010). English language teaching materials: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckler, N. C., Rice, M., & Bryan, C. H. (2013). Turnitin systems: A deterrent to plagiarism in college classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(3), 229–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, G., & Lei, J. (2012). Investigating Chinese university students’ knowledge of and attitudes toward plagiarism from an integrated perspective. Language Learning, 62(3), 813–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, G., & Lei, J. (2015). Chinese university students’ perceptions of plagiarism. Ethics and Behavior, 25(3), 233–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, G., & Sun, X. (2016). Chinese university EFL teachers’ knowledge of and stance on plagiarism. Comunicar, 48(14), 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, S. (2012). Action research in education. International Journal of Research in Education Methodology, 3(2). Retrieved March 23, 2018, from https://pjournals.com/index.php/ijrem/article/view/3952.

  • Keck, C. (2010). How do university students attempt to avoid plagiarism? A grammatic analysis of undergraduate paraphrasing strategies. Writing & Pedagogy, 2(2), 193–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer, D. R. B. (2008, September). Using a plagiarism-catching computer program as a teaching tool. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education Midwest Sectional Conference, Tulsa, OK.

  • Ledwith, A., & Risquez, A. (2008). Using anti-plagiarism software to promote academic honesty in the context of peer reviewed assignments. Studies in Higher Education, 33(4), 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W. O. (1996). The cultural context for Chinese learners: Conceptions of learning in the Confucian tradition. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 25–41). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. F. (2005). Plagiarism and technology: A tool for coping with plagiarism. Journal of Education for Business, 80(3), 149–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. E., Rao, A., & Sloan, L. R. (2009). Plagiarism, integrity, and workplace deviance: A criterion study. Ethics and Behavior, 19(1), 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavrinac, M., Brumini, G., Bilic-Zulle, L., & Petrovecki, M. (2010). Construction and validation of attitudes toward plagiarism questionnaire. Croatian Medical Journal, 51(3), 195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, A., Curtis, G. J., & Vardanega, L. (2008). Does culture influence understanding and perceived seriousness of plagiarism? International Journal for Educational Integrity, 4(2), 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeever, L. (2006). Online plagiarism detection services—Saviour or scourge? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. (2003). In other (people’s) words: Plagiarism by university students literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. (2004). Rebels without a cause: Towards an institutional framework for dealing with plagiarism by students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28, 291–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pecorari, D. (2008). Academic writing and plagiarism: A linguistic analysis. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecorari, D., & Petrić, B. (2014). Plagiarism in second-language writing. Language Teaching, 47(3), 269–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing others’ words: Text, ownership, memory and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 201–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickard, J. (2006). Staff and student attitudes to plagiarism at University College, Northampton. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(2), 215–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, Z. (2013). A study of Chinese learners‘recognition of plagiarism. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 269, 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakovski, C. C., & Kevy, E. S. (2007). Academic dishonesty: Perceptions of business students. College Student Journal, 41(2), 466–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roig, M. (2007). Some reflections on plagiarism: The problem of paraphrasing in the sciences. European Science Editing, 33(2), 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scaife, B. (2007). IT consultancy plagiarism detection software report for JISC Advisory Service. Manchester, UK: NCC Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, P. M., & Neumann, D. R. (2002). Internet plagiarism among college students. Journal of College Student Development, 43(3), 374–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, L. (2006). Cultural backgrounds and textual appropriation. Language Awareness, 15, 264–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, L. (2012). Rewriting and paraphrasing source texts in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 134–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirazi, B., Jafarey, A. M., & Moazam, F. (2010). Plagiarism and the medical fraternity: A study of knowledge and attitudes. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association, 60(4), 269–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapleon, P. (2012). Gauging the effectiveness of anti-plagiarism software: An empirical study of second language graduate writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 125–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y. C. (2009). Using a two-tier test in examining Taiwan graduate students’ perspectives on paraphrasing strategies. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10, 399–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, T. T. (2012). The perceptions and attitudes of international students towards plagiarism. The ACPET Journal for Private Higher Education, 1(2), 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. (2010). Measuring plagiarism: Researching what students do, not what they say they do. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 41–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigle, S. C., & Parker, K. (2012). Source text borrowing in an integrated reading/writing assessment. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 118–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, G. (2009). Plagiarism in the Japanese universities: Truly a cultural matter? Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, J. (2009). Staff and student perceptions of plagiarism and cheating. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20, 98–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, K. (2003). What prevents ESL/EFL writers from avoiding plagiarism? Analyses of 10 North-American college websites. System, 31, 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youmans, R. J. (2011). Does the adoption of plagiarism-detection software in higher education reduce plagiarism? Studies in Higher Education, 36(7), 749–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 106-2410-H-214-006).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied English, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

    Hui-Fang Shang

Authors
  1. Hui-Fang Shang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui-Fang Shang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shang, HF. An investigation of plagiarism software use and awareness training on English as a foreign language (EFL) students. J Comput High Educ 31, 105–120 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9193-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9193-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation