Skip to main content
Log in

JazzFlow—Analyzing “Group Flow” Among Jazz Musicians Through “Honest Signals”

  • Technical Contribution
  • Published:
KI - Künstliche Intelligenz Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this project we aim to analyze “honest signals” between Jazz musicians by using sociometric badges with the goal of identifying structural properties of self-organizing creative teams. In particular, we are interested in the pre-requisites for “flow,” the state of work where “time flies,” and workers are at their most-productive best. We extend the concept of individual “flow” as defined by Csikszentmihalyi (Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper Row, New York, 1990) to the group level (Sawyer in Group creativity: music, theater, collaboration. Psychology Press, Oxford, 2003; Group genius: the creative power of collaboration. Basic Books, New York, 2007), trying to identify some of the conditions indicative of the group flow state. We speculate that a band of Jazz musicians is particularly well suited to study group flow, because they are an archetype of a self-organizing creative team, involved in highly creatively work while passing leadership of the tune for the solo part from one band member to the next.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://hd.media.mit.edu/tech-reports/TR-619.pdf.

  2. E.g. see: http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/44913.

References

  1. Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In: Staw BM, Cummings LL (eds) Research in organizational behavior. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 123–167

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amabile TM (1990) Within you, without you: the social psychology of creativity and beyond. In: Runco MA, Albert RS (eds) Theories of creativity. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 61–91

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barron FB, Harrington DM (1981) Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annu Rev Psychol 32:439–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bharadwaj S, Menon A (2000) Making innovation happen in organizations: individual creativity mechanisms, organizational creativity mechanisms or both? J Prod Innov Manag 17:424–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burt R (2005) Brokerage and closure. An introduction to social capital. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carrol JB (1985) Domains of cognitive ability. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Los Angeles

  7. Csíkszentmihályi M (1996) Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Perennial, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Csikszentmihalyi M (1990) Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gloor P (2006) Swarm creativity, competitive advantage through collaborative innovation networks. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gloor P, Oster D, Raz O, Pentland A, Schoder D (2010) The virtual mirror—reflecting on your social and psychological self to increase organizational creativity. In: J Int Stud Manag Organ, 40(2)

  11. Goldenberg J, Mazursky D (2002) Creativity in product innovation. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldenberg J, Mazursky D, Solomon S (1999) Creative sparks. Science 285(5433):1495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldenberg J, Lehmann RD, Mazursky D (2001) The idea itself and the circumstances of its emergence as predictors of new product success. Manag Sci 47(1):69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Grant AM, Gino F, Hofmann DA (2011) Reversing the extroverted leadership advantage: the role of employee proactivity. Acad Manag J 54(3):528–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Guimera R, Uzzi B, Spiro J, Nunes Amaral L (2005) Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science 308:697–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hackman JR, Katz N (2010) Group behavior and performance. In: Fiske ST, Gilbert DT, Lindzey G (eds) Handbook of social psychology, 5th edn. Wiley, New York, pp 1208–1251

    Google Scholar 

  17. King N, Anderson N (1990) Innovation in working groups. In: West MA, Farr JL (eds) Innovation and creativity at work. Wiley, Chichester, pp 81–100

    Google Scholar 

  18. Limb CJ, Braun AR (2008) Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: an fMRI study of jazz improvisation. PLoS ONE 3(2):e1679. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Manzano O, Theorell T, Harmat L, Ullen F (2010) The psychophysiology of flow during piano playing. Emotion 10(3):301–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mitchell TR, Holtom BC, Lee TW, Sablynski CJ, Erez M (2001) Why people stay: using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Acad Manag J 44:1102–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Olguín Olguín D (2007) Sociometric badges: wearable technology for measuring human behavior. MAS Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge, MA, May

  22. Olguín Olguín D, Pentland AS (2010) Sensor-based organisational design and engineering. Int J Organ Des Eng 1(1/2):69–97

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pentland AS (2008) Honest signals, how they shape our world. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sawyer C (2003) Group creativity: music, theater, collaboration. Psychology Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sawyer C (2007) Group genius: the creative power of collaboration. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Simonton DK (1986) Biographical typicality, eminence and achievement styles. J Creat Behav 20:14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Woodman R, Sherwood J (1980) The role of team development in organizational effectiveness: a critical review. Psychol Bull 88:166–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Woodmann RW, Sawyer JE, Griffin RW (1993) Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad Manag Rev 18(2):293–321

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou J, Shin SJ, Brass DJ, Choi J, Zhang ZX (2009) Social networks, personal values, and creativity: evidence for curvilinear and interaction effects. J Appl Psychol 94(6):1544–1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are deeply indebted to the members of the “Big K and the Solid Senders” Jazz band for their spontaneous agreement to collaborate in our experiment, by wearing the sociometric badges during a live concert. We also would like to thank Daniel Olguin Olguin for providing support and guidance in using the most recent version of the sociometric badges.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter A. Gloor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gloor, P.A., Oster, D. & Fischbach, K. JazzFlow—Analyzing “Group Flow” Among Jazz Musicians Through “Honest Signals”. Künstl Intell 27, 37–43 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-012-0230-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-012-0230-3

Keywords

Navigation