Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Linking social wellbeing and intersectionality to understand gender relations in dried fish value chains

  • Viewpoint
  • Published:
Maritime Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this perspective paper is to advance a comprehensive framework to integrate gender within the study of dried fish value chains. We do so by linking three complementary areas of scholarship: social wellbeing, intersectionality, and value chains. Social wellbeing literature emphasizes the range of benefits generated through dried fish value chains (e.g., social ties, cultural values, and material goods). An intersectional perspective, however, brings attention to the relational structures (e.g., caste, ethnicity) that intersect with gender to uniquely position women and men within value chains in relation to the benefits they can generate. In developing this framework, a key point of departure from existing literature is the notion of relationality (i.e., the creation of experiences in relation to one another within a given context). The value chain analysis further reveals how such unique positions determine the wellbeing outcomes women can generate through their participation in value chains. We demonstrate the contribution of this novel framework by applying it within dried fish case examples from Bangladesh, Tanzania, and Sri Lanka. In doing so, we systematically unpack how gender intersects with other structures of oppression and perpetuate gender inequity. Our framework thus results in a ‘thick description’ of gender relations operating in dried fish value chains. The insights that emerge can inform relevant policies, decision-making processes, and programs to ensure the creation of equitable wellbeing outcomes by those participating in dried fish value chains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data and material availability statement

N/A.

Notes

  1. Bavinck, M., Verrips, J., 2020. Manifesto for the marine social sciences. Maritime Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-020-00179-x

  2. Frangoudes, K., Gerrard, S., Said, A., 2020. Commentary Six to the Manifesto for the marine social sciences: gender and the role of women. Maritime Studies 19, 137–138.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-020-00186-y

  3. Existing studies related to dried seafood value chains (i.e., invertebrates and other high-valued products such as sea cucumber, abalone, and shark fins) are largely concerned with the economic returns associated with the trading of specialized products destined for global markets (e.g., China, Europe). Such studies are therefore less helpful in understanding the significance of dried fish value chains toward supporting local livelihoods (beyond mere economic terms) with attention locally produced, traded, and consumed dried fish products.

  4. Although our discussion in this paper refers only to the gender categories of women and men, we acknowledge the need to move beyond the gender binary. Our attention to marginalized groups in fact may have relevance for transgender, nonbinary, and intersex identities.

References

  • Ahmed, D.M., M.N. Islam, and M. Shamsuddoha. 2007. Value chain analysis in the dry fish production and marketing of Post-harvest Fishery Products (PHFP) in the coastal belt of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Fisheries Research Forum.

  • Barclay, K., B. Leduc, S. Mangubhai, and C. Donato-Hunt. 2021. Pacific handbook for gender equity and social inclusion in coastal fisheries and aquaculture. Noumea: Pacific Community.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrientos, S., G. Gereffi, and A. Rossi. 2011. Economic and social upgrading in global production networks: A new paradigm for a changing world. International Labour Review 150: 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2011.00119.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belton, B., A. Hein, K. Htoo, L.S. Kham, U. Nischan, T. Reardon, and D. Boughton. 2015. Aquaculture in transition: value chain transformation (International Development Working Paper 139), Fish and Food Security in Myanmar. Lancing: Michigan State University.

  • Belton, B., M.A.R. Hossain, and S.H. Thilsted. 2018. Labour, Identity and Wellbeing in Bangladesh’s Dried Fish Value Chains. In Social Wellbeing and the Values of Small-Scale Fisheries, 217–241. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60750-4_10.

  • Bennett, E. 2005. Gender, fisheries and development. Marine Policy 29: 451–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2004.07.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berenji, S. 2020. The role of values and beliefs in small-scale fishery and dried fish production: An exploration of social well-being in fishing communities of Sagar Island (Indian Sundarbans) (A thesis produced in fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Environmental Studies in Sustainability Management). Waterloo: University of Waterloo.

  • Bolwig, S., S. Ponte, A. Du Toit, L. Riisgaard, and N. Halberg. 2010. Integrating Poverty and Environmental Concerns into Value-Chain Analysis: A Conceptual Framework. Development Policy Review 28: 173–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2010.00480.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, S.R., B. Belton, D.C. Little, and M.S. Islam. 2019. Emerging trends in aquaculture value chain research. Aquaculture 498: 428–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.08.077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, K.A., L. Pincus, M.M. Pasqualino, F. Muzofa, and S.M. Cole. 2021. Dried small fish provide nutrient densities important for the first 1000 days. Maternal & Child Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, C., and J. Mitchell. 2011. Gender and agricultural value chains—a review of current knowledge and practice and their policy implications (ESA Working Paper No. 11–05). Agricultural Development Economics Division, FAO.

  • Cooper, B. 2016. Intersectionality. In The Oxford handbook of feminist theory, ed. L. Disch and M. Hawkesworth. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199328581.013.20.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, A. 2003. Whose Voices? Whose Choices? Reflections on Gender and Participatory Development. World Development 31: 1325–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00086-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, A. 2016. Women’s empowerment: What works? Journal of International Development 28: 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulthard, S. 2012. What does the debate around social wellbeing have to offer sustainable fisheries? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4: 358–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulthard, S., D. Johnson, and J.A. McGregor. 2011. Poverty, sustainability and human wellbeing: A social wellbeing approach to the global fisheries crisis. Global Environmental Change 21: 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. 1991. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43: 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. 1989. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: a Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1 (Article 8).

  • CRIAW. 2006. Intersectional Feminist Frameworks: an Emerging Vision. Ottawa: Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deb, A.K., C.E. Haque, and S. Thompson. 2015. ‘Man can’t give birth, woman can’t fish’: Gender dynamics in the small-scale fisheries of Bangladesh. Gender, Place & Culture 22: 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2013.855626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunaway, W., ed. 2013. Gendered Commodity Chains: Seeing Womens’s Work and Households in Global Production. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabinyi, M., W.H. Dressler, and M.D. Pido. 2018. Moving beyond financial value in seafood commodity chains. Marine Policy 94: 89–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.04.033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO. 2015. Voluntary guidelines for securing sustainable small-scale fisheries in the context of food security and poverty eradication. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. 2020. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2020: sustainability in action. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9229en.10.4060/ca9229en.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO, 2016. Developing gender-sensitive value chains: a guiding framework. Rome.

  • FAO, 2017. Towards gender-equitable small-scale fisheries governance and development—a handbook. In support of the implementation of the Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries in the Context of Food Security and Poverty Eradication, by Nilanjana Biswas. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://doi.org/10.18356/e999fb85-en

  • Ferguson, C.E. 2021. A rising tide does not lift all boats: Intersectional analysis reveals inequitable impacts of the seafood trade in fishing communities. Frontiers in Marine Science 8: 625389. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.625389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frangoudes, K., and S. Gerrard. 2018. (En)Gendering Change in Small-Scale Fisheries and Fishing Communities in a Globalized World. Maritime Studies 17: 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-018-0113-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frangoudes, K., S. Gerrard, and D. Kleiber. 2019. Situated transformations of women and gender relations in small-scale fisheries and communities in a globalized world. Maritime Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-019-00159-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fröcklin, S., M. de la Torre-Castro, L. Lindström, and N.S. Jiddawi. 2013. Fish Traders as Key Actors in Fisheries: Gender and Adaptive Management. Ambio 42: 951–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0451-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. 1973. Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture. In The Interpretation of Cultures, 310–323. New York: Basic Books Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G., and J. Lee. 2016. Economic and Social Upgrading in Global Value Chains and Industrial Clusters: Why Governance Matters. Journal of Business Ethics 133: 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2373-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopal, N., H.M. Hapke, K. Kusakabe, S. Rajaratnam, and M.J. Williams. 2020. Expanding the horizons for women in fisheries and aquaculture. Gender, Technology and Development 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2020.1736353.

  • Gustavsson, M. 2020. Women’s changing productive practices, gender relations and identities in fishing through a critical feminisation perspective. Journal of Rural Studies 78: 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.06.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hapke, H.M., and D. Ayyankeril. 2018. Gendered livelihoods in the global fish-food economy: A comparative study of three fisherfolk communities in Kerala, India. Maritime Studies 17: 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-018-0105-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, S., M. Adshade, V.W.Y. Lam, D. Pauly, and U.R. Sumaila. 2020. Valuing invisible catches: Estimating the global contribution by women to small-scale marine capture fisheries production. PLoS ONE 15: e0228912. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, M.A.R., B. Belton, and S.H. Thilsted. 2015. Dried fish value chain in Bangladesh. Dhaka: WorldFish, Bangladesh and South Asia Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.S. 2018. The Values of Small-Scale Fisheries. In Social Wellbeing and the Values of Small-Scale Fisheries, MARE Publication Series, ed. D.S. Johnson, T.G. Acott, N. Stacey, and J. Urquhart, 1–22. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, F.N., A.M. Collins, P.K. Nayak, and D. Armitage. 2018. Women’s perspectives of small-scale fisheries and environmental change in Chilika lagoon, India. Maritime Studies 17: 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-018-0100-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiber, D., K. Frangoudes, H.T. Snyder, A. Choudhury, S.M. Cole, K. Soejima, C. Pita, A. Santos, C. McDougall, H. Petrics, and M. Porter. 2017. Promoting Gender Equity and Equality Through the Small-Scale Fisheries Guidelines: Experiences from Multiple Case Studies. In The Small-Scale Fisheries Guidelines: Global Implementation, ed. S. Jentoft, R. Chuenpagdee, M.J. Barragán-Paladines, and N. Franz, 737–759. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55074-9_35.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koralagama, D., J. Gupta, and N. Pouw. 2017. Inclusive development from a gender perspective in small-scale fisheries. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 24: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruijssen, F., C.L. McDougall, and I.J.M. van Asseldonk. 2018. Gender and aquaculture value chains: A review of key issues and implications for research. Aquaculture 493: 328–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.12.038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laven, A., and N. Verhart. 2011. Addressing gender equality in agricultural value chains: sharing work in progress. The Netherlands: Development Policy Review Network (DPRN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, S., P. Cohen, C. McDougall, G. Orirana, F. Soita, and K. Doyle. 2012. Gender norms and relations: Implications for agency in coastal livelihoods. Maritime Studies 18: 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-019-00147-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, S., P.J. Cohen, S. Mangubhai, D. Kleiber, and T.H. Morrison. 2021. Gender equality is diluted in commitments made to small-scale fisheries. World Development 140: 105348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lentisco, A., and R.U. Lee. 2015. A review of women’s access to fish in small-scale fisheries (FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1098). Rome: FAO.

  • Lokuge, G., and D. Hilhorst. 2017. Outside the net: Intersectionality and inequality in the fisheries of Trincomalee, Sri Lanka. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies 23: 473–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2017.1386839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorde, A. 1984. Learning from the 60s. In Sister Outsider: Essays & Speeches, ed. Audre Lorde, 138. Berkeley: Crossing Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manyungwa, C.L., M.M. Hara, and S.K. Chimatiro. 2019. Women’s engagement in and outcomes from small-scale fisheries value chains in Malawi: Effects of social relations. Maritime Studies 8: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-019-00156-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manyungwa-Pasani, C.L., M. Hara, and S.K. Chimatiro. 2017. Women’s participation in fish value chains and value chain governance in Malawi: a case of Msaka (Lake Malawi) and Kachulu (Lake Chilwa) (Working Paper 45). Institution for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS), UWC, Cape Town.

  • Matsue, N., T. Daw, and L. Garrett. 2014. Women Fish Traders on the Kenyan Coast: Livelihoods, Bargaining Power, and Participation in Management. Coastal Management 42: 531–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2014.964819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, A. 2008. Well-Being, Poverty and Conflict. Briefing Paper 1/08, ESRC Research Group on Wellbeing in Developing Countries. Bath: University of Bath.

  • Medard, M., H. van Dijk, and P. Hebinck. 2019. Competing for kayabo: Gendered struggles for fish and livelihood on the shore of Lake Victoria. Maritime Studies 18: 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-019-00146-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neis, B. 2005. Introduction. In Changing Tides: Gender, Fisheries and Globalization, ed. B. Neis, M. Binkley, S. Gerrard, and M.C. Maneschy, 1–13. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nightingale, A.J. 2011. Bounding difference: Intersectionality and the material production of gender, caste, class and environment in Nepal. Geoforum 42: 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. 1985. The Value Chain and Competitive Advantage. In Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Perormance, 33–52. New York: With a New Introduction. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, S.W., B.I. Crona, W. Lalavanua, and H. Eriksson. 2017. Distribution of economic returns in small-scale fisheries for international markets: A value-chain analysis. Marine Policy 86: 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quist, C. 2015. Widows’ struggles in post-war Sri Lanka. Yemaya: ICSF’s Newsletter on Gender and Fisheries published by the International Collective in Support of Fishworkers (ICSF) No. 50, 5–7.

  • Reardon, T., K. Chen, B. Minten, and L. Adriano. 2012. The Quiet Revolution in Staple Food Value Chains Enter the Dragon, the Elephant, and the Tiger. Mandaluyong City: Asian Development Bank and International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resurreccion, B.P., and R. Elmhirst, eds. 2008. Gender and natural resource management: livelihoods, mobility and interventions. London, Sterling: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riisgaard, L., A.M.E. Fibla, and S. Ponte. 2010. Gender and value chain development. Copenhagen: The Danish Institute for International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A., A.P. Sharma, U. Bhaumik, A. Pandit, S.R.K. Singh, S. Saha, and A. Mitra. 2017. Socio-economic features of womenfolk of indian sunderbans involved in fish drying. Indian Journal of Extension Education 53: 142–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samanta, C., U. Bhaumik, and B.C. Patra. 2016. Socio-economic status of the fish curers of the dry fish industry of the coastal areas of West Bengal, India. International Journal of Current Research and Academic Review 4: 84–100. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcrar.2016.405.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamsuddoha, M. 2007. Supply and value chain analysis in the marketing of marine dried fish in Bangladesh and Non-tariff Measures (NTMs) in International Trading (Paper prepared for the 106th seminar of the EAAE Pro-poor development in low income countries: Food, agriculture, trade, and environment). Montpellier: France.

  • Stacey, N., and H. Govan. 2021. Module 8: Livelihoods. In Pacific handbook for gender equity and social inclusion in coastal fisheries and aquaculture, ed. K. Barclay, S. Mangubhai, B. Leduc, C. Donato-Hunt, K. Makhoul, J. Kinch, and J. Kalsuak, 28. Noumea: Pacific Community.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoian, D., J. Donovan, M. Elias, and T. Blare. 2018. Fit for purpose? A review of guides for gender-equitable value chain development. Development in Practice 28: 494–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2018.1447550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torre, J., A. Hernandez-Velasco, F.F. Rivera-Melo, J. Lopez, and M.J. Espinosa-Romero. 2019. Women’s empowerment, collective actions, and sustainable fisheries: Lessons from Mexico. Maritime Studies 18: 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-019-00153-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNHSP. 2015. Mannar disaster risk reduction and preparedness plan: towards a sustainable and resilient city. Colombo: United Nations Human Settlements Programme -UHNSP (UN Habitat) - Sri Lanka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeratunge, N., C. Béné, R. Siriwardane, A. Charles, D. Johnson, E.H. Allison, P.K. Nayak, and M.-C. Badjeck. 2014. Small-scale fisheries through the wellbeing lens. Fish and Fisheries 15: 255–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, S.C. 2010. Analysing wellbeing: A framework for development practice. Development in Practice 20: 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520903564199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, S.C. 2008. But What is Wellbeing? A Framework for Analysis in Social and Development Policy and Practice (WeD Working Paper No. 43). Wellbeing in Developing Countries ESRC Research Group, Bath: University of Bath.

  • Williams, M.J. 2010. Gender Dimensions in Fisheries Management. In Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management, ed. R.Q. Grafton, R. Hilborn, D. Squires, M. Tait, and M. Williams, 72–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yingst, A., and U.D. Skaptadóttir. 2018. Gendered labor in the Icelandic fish processing industry. Maritime Studies 17: 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-018-0099-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback and suggestions that significantly improved this manuscript. MG acknowledges the financial support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) through a Doctoral Fellowship (No. 752-2018-0193) and a Partnership Research Grant titled ‘Dried Fish Matters’ (No. 895-2018-1017). We are also grateful to Jeremy Pittman and Sisir Kanta Pradhan for the insightful conversations that shaped the ideas discussed in this manuscript.

Funding

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC)—Doctoral Fellowship (No. 752–2018-0193); Partnership Research Grant titled ‘Dried Fish Matters’ (No. 895–2018-1017).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madu Galappaththi.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Galappaththi, M., Collins, A.M., Armitage, D. et al. Linking social wellbeing and intersectionality to understand gender relations in dried fish value chains. Maritime Studies 20, 355–370 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-021-00232-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-021-00232-3

Keywords

Navigation