Skip to main content
Log in

Support groups for battered women: Research on their efficacy

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An evaluation of 12 support groups for women victims of domestic assault revealed substantial benefits associated with group participation. A total of 76 women responded to an assessment package before, immediately after, and six months following the group. Significant improvements were found in self-esteem, belonging support, locus of control, less traditional attitudes towards marriage and the family, perceived stress, and marital functioning. Unexpectedly, clients currently living with their spouses also reported significant decreases in both physical and nonphysical abuse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnett, E., Pittman, C., Ragan, C., and Salus, M. (1980).Family Violence: Intervention Strategies, U S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J. (1977). Rescuing the battered wife.Hum. Behav. 16243: 6–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, L. (1984). Coping with wife abuse: Personal and social networks. In Roberts, A. (ed.),Battered Women and Their Families: Intervention Strategies and Treatment Programs, Springer, New York, pp. 169–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, M. (ed.) (1985),Handbook for Advocates and Counsellors of Battered Women, London Battered Women's Advocacy Clinic, London, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, B. (1977). Battered women and their assailants.Social Work 22: 455–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claerhout, S., Elder, J., and Janes, C. (1982). Problem solving skills of rural battered women.Am. J. Commun. Psychol. 10: 605–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., and Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress.J. Health Social Behav. 24: 385–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., Mermelstein, R., Kamarck, T., and Hoberman, H. (1985). Measuring the functional components of social support. In Sarason, I. G., and Sarason, B. R. (eds.),Social Support: Theory, Research and Application, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coopersmith, S. (1987).Self Esteem Inventories, Consulting Psychologist Press, Palo Alto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristall, L. (1978). A comparison of androgyny and self-actualization in battered women.Diss. Abstr. Int. 39: 5039B-5040B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, S. (1983).Battered Women: Psychological Correlates of the Victimization Process, University Microfilm International, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J. (1979).Stopping Wife Abuse, Anchor Press/Doubleday, Garden City, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follingstad, D., Rutledge, L., Berg, B., Hause, E., and Polek, D. (1990). The role of emotional abuse in physically abusive relationships.J. Fam. Viol. 5(2): 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles-Sims, J. (1983).Wife Battering: A Systems Theory Approach, Guilford Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gondolf, E., and Fisher, E. (1988).Battered Women as Survivors: An Alternative to Treating Learned Helplessness, Lexington, Lexington, MA.

  • Harris, D. (1985). Support groups for battered women. In Sinclair, D. (ed.),Wife Assault: A Training Manual for Counsellors and Advocates, Government of Ontario, Toronto, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartik, L. (1982).Identification of Personality Characteristics and Self-Concept Factors of Battered Wives, R & E Research Association, Inc., Palo Alto, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, S. (1983). A self-help group for women in abusive relationships.Social Work Groups 6: 133–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilberman, E., and Munson, K. (1978). Sixty battered women.Victimology 2(3-4): 1460–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotaling, G., and Sugarman, D. (1986). An analysis of risk markers in husband to wife violence: The current state of knowledge.Viol. Vict. 1: 101–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotaling, G., and Sugarman, D. (1990). A risk marker analysis of assaulted wives.J. Fam. Viol 5(1): 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, W., and McIntosh, S. (1981). The assessment of spouse abuse: Two quantifiable dimensions.J. Man. Fam. 42: 873–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, D., Attkisson, C., Hargreaves, W., and Nguyen T. (1979). Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: Development of a general scale.Eval. Progr. Plan. 2: 197–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Launius, M. H., and Jensen, B. L. (1987). Interpersonal problem solving skills in battered, counseling, and control women.J. Fam. Viol. 2(2): 151–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mardoyan, J. (1985).Personality Characteristics of Battered Women: The Examination of Self-Concept. Locus of Control, and Irrationality, University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirels, H. (1971). Dimensions of internal versus external control.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 34: 226–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, B. (1984).Family Violence: Origins and Treatment, University of Guelph Office for Educational Practice, Guelph, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, B. (1989a). Treatment of wife-abuse: The case for feminist therapy. In Pressman, B., Cameron, G., Rothery, M. (eds.),Intervening with Assaulted Women: Current Theory, Research and Practice, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 21–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, B. (1989b). Wife-abused couples: The need for comprehensive theoretical perspectives and integrated treatment models.J. Fem. Fam. Ther. 1(1): 23–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridington, J. (1977). The transition process: A feminist environment as reconstitutive milieu.Victimology 2(3–4): 563–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external locus of reinforcement.Psychological Monogr. 80: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, M. (Ed.). (1977).Battered Women: A Psychosociological Study of Domestic Behavior, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, S. (1987).Group Treatment for Abusive Men and Their Partners, Family Service London, London, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, H., Steinhauer, P., and Santa-Barbara, J. (1983). The Family Assessment Measure. Canad.J. Commun. Ment. Health 2(2): 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, B. (1978). Comparing battered and nonbattered women.Victimology 3(1–2): 32–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, E. (1984).The Battering Syndrome: Social Knowledge, Social Therapy and the Abuse of Women, University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scale.J. Man. Fam. Feb. 75–88.

  • Walker, L. (1978). Battered women and learned helplessness.Victimology 2(3–4): 525–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel, L., and Ross, M. (1983). Psychological and social ramifications of battering: Observations leading to a counselling methodology for victims of domestic violence.Person. Guid. J. 61(7): 423–428.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tutty, L.M., Bidgood, B.A. & Rothery, M.A. Support groups for battered women: Research on their efficacy. J Fam Viol 8, 325–343 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00978097

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00978097

Key words

Navigation