Abstract
Two experiments are reported which invesigate hindsight bias (the tendency to overestimate the probability of an event when one knows it has occurred and is asked to ignore the fact). Experiment I focuses upon the influence of commitments and desires upon subjective probability assessments in hindsight and foresight. Using the British General Election of May 1979 and Conservative and Labour Party members as subjects, only weak support for hindsight bias was found. However, party affiliation did exert a strong influence over likelihood assessments; outcomes favourable to the preferred party were perceived as more likely, in both foresight and hindsight, than outcomes favourable to the other party, and vice versa. Experiment 11 required subjects to make estimates in foresight and hindsight concerning the numbers of percentages of women in various roles in society. Strong evidence for hindsight bias was found. The paper concludes by considering the judgemental strategies subjects might have used in the two experiments. This is done by drawing on the heuristics of thinking proposed by Tversky and Kahneman.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Butler, D. & Kavanagh, D. (1975). The British General Election of October, 1974. London: Macmillan.
Cantril, H. (1938). The prediction of social events. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 33, 364–389.
Carroll, J.S. (1978). The effect of imagining an event on expectation for the event: an interpretation in terms of the availability heuristic. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 88–96.
Craik, F. I. M. & Lockhart, R.S. (1972). Levels of processing: framework for memory search. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 11, 671–684.
Craik, F.I.M. & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294.
Crozier, W.R. (1979). The interaction of value and subjective probability in risky decision-making. British Journal of Psychology, 70, 489–495.
Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight foresight: the effect of outcome knowledge on judgement uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288–299.
Fischhoff, B. (1977). Perceived informativeness of facts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 349–358.
Fischhoff, B. & Beyth, M. (1975). ‘I knew it would happen’: remembered probabilities of once future things. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 13, 116.
Janis, I. & Mann, L. (1977). Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice and Commitment. New York: Free Press.
Jones, R.A. (1977). Self-fulfilling Prophecies: Social Psychological and Physiological Effects of Expectancies. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
McGregor, D. (1938). The major determinants of the prediction of social events. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 33, 179–204.
Pennington, D.C. (1980). Social Cognition: Effects of Outcome Knowledge and Order of Information on Judgement under Uncertainty. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick.
Pennington, D.C. (1981). The British firemen's strike of 1977/78: an investigation of judgements in foresight and hindsight. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 89–96.
Pennington, D.C., Rutter, D.R., McKenna, K. & Morley, I.E. (1980). Estimating the outcome of a pregnancy test: women's judgements in foresight and hindsight. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 317–23.
Sevon, G. (1975). Probability estimates of social events as related to values. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 16, 229–232.
Slovic, P. (1966). Value as a determiner of subjective probability. IEEE Transactions of Human Factors in Electronics, Vol. HFE 7, 22–28.
Slovic, P. & Fischhoff, B. (1977). On the psychology of experimental surprises. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 554–551.
Taylor, S. & Fiske, S. T. (1978). Salience, attention and attribution: top of the head phenomena. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 11. New York: Academic Press.
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probabil ity. Cogniti ve Psychology, 5, 207–232.
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D, (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
Walster, E. (1967). Second guessing important events. Human Relations, 20, 239–250.
Winer, B.J. (1971). Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 2nd Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wood, G. (1978). The knew-it-all-along effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 345–346.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pennington, D.C. Being wise after the event: an investigation of hindsight bias. Current Psychological Research 1, 271–282 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03186737
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03186737