Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of cyclic δ-opioid peptides with non-peptide δ-agonist spiroindanyloxymorphone (SIOM) using the message-address concept: A molecular modeling study

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Based upon the message-address concept, this molecular modeling study used the δ-selective agonist spiroindanyloxymorphone (SIOM) as a molecular template for a conformational search and analysis of δ-selective opioid peptides. It was assumed that the tyramine moiety plays the same role for δ-opioid receptor recognition in both peptide and non-peptide ligands. Using 20 reported low-energy conformations of Tyr-cyclo[d-Cys-d-Pen]-OH (JOM-13) for comparison, the geometrical relationship of the two aromatic rings present in SIOM was used for the identification of potential active conformations of JOM-13, from which two δ-receptor-binding models (I and II) were constructed. Models I and II differ from each other in the arrangement of the peptide backbones. To evaluate the two models, a conformational search of two other known δ-selective ligands, [d-Pen2,d-Pen5]enkephalin (DPDPE) and [d-Pen2,l-Pen5]enkephalin (DPLPE) was performed, using the geometrical relationship of the two aromatic rings defined in the two receptor-binding models as a molecular template. Among the conformations generated from the molecular simulation, low-energy conformers of DPDPE and DPLPE conforming to models I and II were identified. Unlike model I, conformers of DPDPE and DPLPE that fit model II contain a cis amide bond in the Gly3 residue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SchwyzerR., Ann. New York Acad. Sci., 247 (1977) 3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. HrubyV.J. and GehrigC.A., Med. Res. Rev., 9 (1989) 343.

    Google Scholar 

  3. SchillerP.W., In HerzA. (Ed.) Opioids I, Vol. 104, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1993, pp. 681–710.

    Google Scholar 

  4. SalvadoriS., BryantS.D., BianchiC., BalboniG., ScaranariV., AttilaM. and LazarusL.H., J. Med. Chem., 36 (1993) 3748.

    Google Scholar 

  5. QianX., KövérK.E., ShenderovichM.D., LouB., MisickaA., ZalewskaT., HorváthR., DavisP., BilskyE.J., PorrecaF., YamamuraH.I. and HrubyV.J., J. Med. Chem., 37 (1994) 1746.

    Google Scholar 

  6. BryantS.D., AttilaM., SalvadoriS., GuerriniR. and LazarusL.H., Pept. Res., 7 (1994) 175.

    Google Scholar 

  7. MisickaA., LipkowskiA.W., HorvathR., DavisP., YamamuraH.I., PorrecaF. and HrubyV.J., J. Med. Chem., 37 (1994) 141.

    Google Scholar 

  8. LordJ.A.H., WaterfieldA.A., HughesJ. and KosterlitzH.W., Nature, 267 (1977) 495.

    Google Scholar 

  9. ChuangL.C., ChenS.T. and YaC., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1158 (1993) 209.

    Google Scholar 

  10. SchillerP.W. and DiMaioJ., Nature, 297 (1982) 74.

    Google Scholar 

  11. BradburyA.F., SmythD.G. and SnellC.R., Nature, 260 (1976) 165.

    Google Scholar 

  12. GorinF.A. and MarshallG.R., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 74 (1977) 5179.

    Google Scholar 

  13. SchillerP.W., YamC.F. and LisM., Biochemistry, 16 (1977) 1832.

    Google Scholar 

  14. GottschlichR., Kontakte, 1 (1990) 3.

    Google Scholar 

  15. HrubyV.J., Biopolymers, 33 (1993) 1073.

    Google Scholar 

  16. SchillerP.W., NguyenT.M., WeltrowskaG., WilkesB.C., MarsdenB.J., LemieuxC. and ChungN.N., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89 (1992) 11871.

    Google Scholar 

  17. MosbergH.I. and KroonaH.B., J. Med. Chem., 35 (1992) 4498.

    Google Scholar 

  18. MosbergH.I., LomizeA.L., WangC., KroonaH., HeylD.L., Sobczy-KijiroK., MaW., MousigianC. and PorrecaF., J. Med. Chem., 37 (1994) 4371.

    Google Scholar 

  19. MosbergH.I., OmnassJ.R., LomizeA.L., HeylD.L., NordanI., MousigianC., DavisP. and PorrecaF., J. Med. Chem., 37 (1994) 4384.

    Google Scholar 

  20. MosbergH.I., HurstR., HrubyV.I., GeeK., YamamuraH.I. and GalliganJ.J., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 80 (1983) 5871.

    Google Scholar 

  21. HrubyV.J., KaoL., PettittB.M. and KarplusM., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110 (1988) 3351.

    Google Scholar 

  22. MatsunagaT.O., CollinsN., RamaswamiV., YamamuraS.H., O'brienD.F. and HrubyV.J., Biochemistry, 32 (1993) 13180.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Flippen-AndersonJ.L., HrubyV.J., CollinsN., GeorgeC. and CudneyB., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116 (1994) 7523.

    Google Scholar 

  24. PettittB.M., MatsunagaT., Al-ObeidiF., GehrigC., HrubyV.J. and KarplusM., Biophys. J., 60 (1991) 1540.

    Google Scholar 

  25. FroimowitzM., Biopolymers, 30 (1990) 1011.

    Google Scholar 

  26. ChewC., VillarH. and LoewG., Mol. Pharmacol., 39 (1991) 502.

    Google Scholar 

  27. SmithP.E. and PettittB.M., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 113 (1991) 6029.

    Google Scholar 

  28. WilkesB.C. and SchillerP.W., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 5 (1991) 293.

    Google Scholar 

  29. MosbergH.I., Sobczy-KijiroK., SubramanianP., CrippenG.M., RamalingamK. and WoodardR.W., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112 (1990) 822.

    Google Scholar 

  30. SmithP.E. and PettittB.M., Biopolymers, 32 (1992) 1623.

    Google Scholar 

  31. NikiforovichG.V., HrubyV.J., PrakashO. and GehrigC.A., Biopolymers, 31 (1991) 941.

    Google Scholar 

  32. NikiforovichG.V., GolbraikhA.A., ShenderovichM.D. and BalodisJ., Int. J. Pept. Protein Res., 36 (1990) 209.

    Google Scholar 

  33. LomizeA.L., Flippen-AndersonJ.L., GeorgeC. and MosbergH.I., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116 (1994) 429.

    Google Scholar 

  34. PolinskyA., CooneyM.G., Toy-PalmerA., ÖsapayG. and GoodmanM., J. Med. Chem., 35 (1992) 4185.

    Google Scholar 

  35. StewartD.E., SarkarA. and WamplerJ., J. Mol. Biol., 214 (1990) 253.

    Google Scholar 

  36. ElielE.L., WilenS.H., ManderL.N., In Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds, Wiley, New York, NY, 1994, pp. 620–621.

    Google Scholar 

  37. KawaiM., PottorfR.S. and RichD.H., J. Med. Chem., 29 (1986) 2409.

    Google Scholar 

  38. MierkeD.F., YamazakiT., Said-NejadO.E., FelderE.R. and GoodmanM., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 111 (1989) 6847.

    Google Scholar 

  39. YamazakiT., RoS., GoodmanM., ChuangN.N. and SchillerP.W., J. Med. Chem., 36 (1993) 708.

    Google Scholar 

  40. CerriniS., GavuzzoE., LucenteG. and PinnenF., Int. J. Pept. Protein Res., 31 (1988) 447.

    Google Scholar 

  41. SpencerR.G., HalversonK.J., AugerM., MaDermottA.E., GriffinR.G. and LansburyP.T.J., Biochemistry, 30 (1991) 10382.

    Google Scholar 

  42. MosbergH.I., OmnaasJ.R., SmithC.B. and MedzihradskyF., Life Sci., 43 (1988) 1013.

    Google Scholar 

  43. PortogheseP.S., SultanaM. and TakemoriA.E., J. Med. Chem., 33 (1990) 1714.

    Google Scholar 

  44. PortogheseP.S., MoeS.T. and TakemoriA.E., J. Med. Chem., 36 (1993) 2572.

    Google Scholar 

  45. PortogheseP.S., NagaseK.E., MaloneyHussK.E., LinC. and TakemoriA.E., J. Med. Chem., 34 (1991) 1715.

    Google Scholar 

  46. PortogheseP.S., J. Med. Chem., 35 (1992) 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  47. PortogheseP.S., SultanaM., MoeS.T. and TakemoriA.E., J. Med. Chem., 37 (1994) 579.

    Google Scholar 

  48. StewartP.E. and HammondD.L., J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 266 (1993) 820.

    Google Scholar 

  49. KongH.Y., RaynorK., YasudaK., MoeS.T., PortogheseP.S., BellG.I. and ReisineT., J. Biol. Chem., 268 (1993) 23055.

    Google Scholar 

  50. ChangK.J., RigdonG.C., HowardJ.L. and McNuttR.W., J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 267 (1993) 852.

    Google Scholar 

  51. KenakinT., Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 16 (1995) 188.

    Google Scholar 

  52. KenakinT., Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 16 (1995) 232.

    Google Scholar 

  53. LeffP., Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 16 (1995) 89.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Stewart, J.J.P., MOPAC MANUAL, Frank J. Seiler Research Laboratory, United States Air Force Academy, CO.

  55. Dauber-OsguthorpeP., RobertsV.A., OsguthorpeP.J., WolffJ., GenestM. and HaglerA.T., Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet., 4 (1988) 31.

    Google Scholar 

  56. FletchR., Practical Methods of Optimization, Vol. 1, Wiley, New York, NY, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gao, P. Comparison of cyclic δ-opioid peptides with non-peptide δ-agonist spiroindanyloxymorphone (SIOM) using the message-address concept: A molecular modeling study. J Computer-Aided Mol Des 10, 327–336 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124502

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124502

Keywords

Navigation