Skip to main content
Log in

Chilling and photosynthetic productivity of field grown maize (Zea mays); changes in the parameters of the light-response curve, canopy leaf CO2 assimilation rate and crop radiation-use efficiency

  • Regular Papers
  • Published:
Photosynthesis Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of growth temperatures on the photosynthetic performance of field grown maize (Zea mays cv. LG11) was examined for crops sown on 1 May and 28 June 1991. During the period of growth, 2 May to 10 August, the early-sown crop experienced temperatures below 10 °C on 33 occasions compared with only one for the crop sown on 28 June. The prolonged period of low temperatures throughout May and beginning of June were associated with a marked depression in CO2 assimilation rates at all light levels in the early-sown treatment. Chill-induced depression of the photosynthetic light-response curve reflected a sustained reduction in canopy leaf photosynthesis and crop radiation-use efficiency (RUE). During the early stages of growth, RUE was 65% lower in the early- than late-sown treatment, with no marked recovery observed in the former treatment until approximately three weeks after chilling conditions had ceased. Data show a close correlation between chill-induced depression of quantum yield (Φ) and RUE, with corresponding reductions in the light-saturated rates of CO2 assimilation (Pmax). The convexity of the light-response curve recovered most rapidly from chilling temperatures, and at least three weeks before any improvement in RUE. It is concluded that photosynthetic productivity of immature maize stands is less sensitive to changes in the convexity of the light response, than to changes in either Φ or Pmax.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker NR and Ort DR (1992) Light and crop photosynthetic performance. In: Baker NR and Thomas H (eds) Crop Photosynthesis: Spatial and Temporal Determinants, pp 289–312. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker NR Long SP and Ort DR (1988) Photosynthesis and temperature with particular reference to effects on quantum yield. In: Long SP and Woodward FI (eds) Plants and Temperature, pp 347–375. Company of Biologists, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Biscoe PV and Gallagher JN (1977) Weather, dry matter production and yield. In: Landsberg JJ and Cutting CV (eds) Environmental Effects on Crop Physiology, pp 75–100. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury M and Baker NR (1986) The kinetics of photoinhibition of the photosynthetic apparatus in pea chloroplast. Plant Cell Environ 9: 289–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow WS, Osmond CB and Huang LK (1989) Photosystem II function and herbicide binding sites during photoinhibition of spinach chloroplasts in vivo and in vitro. Photosynth Res 21: 17–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Farage PK and Long SP (1991) The occurence of photoinhibition in over-wintering crop of oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.) and its correlation with changes in crop growth. Planta 185: 279–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Groom QJ and Baker NR (1992) Analysis of light-induced depressions of photosynthesis in leaves of a wheat crop during the winter. Plant Physiol 100: 1217–1223

    Google Scholar 

  • Leverenz JW (1987) Chlorophyll content and the light response curve of shade-adapted conifer needles. Physiologia Plantarum 71: 20–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Leverenz J W Falk S, Pilstrom C-M and Samuelsson G (1990) The effects of photoinhibition on the photosynthetic light-response of green plant cells (Chlamydomas reinhardtii). Planta 182: 161–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Long SP (1993) The significance of light-limiting photosynthesis to crop canopy carbon gain and productivity — a theoretical analysis. In: Abrol YP, Mohanty P and Govindjce (ed) Photosynthesis: Photoreactions and Plant Productivity, pp 547–559. Oxford & IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Long SP, East TM and Baker NR (1983) Chilling damage to photosynthesis in young Zea mays I. Effects of light and temperature variation on photosynthetic CO2 assimilation. J Experimental Botany 34: 177–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Long SP, Farage PK, Groom Q, Macharia JMN and Baker NR (1990) Damage to photosynthesis during chilling and freezing, and its significance to the photosynthetic productivity of field crops. In: Baltschevsky M (ed) Current Research in Photosynthesis, Vol IV, pp 835–842. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Miedema P (1982) The effects of low temperature on Zea mays. Advances in Agronomy 35: 93–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteith JL (1981) Does light limit crop production. In: Johnson CB (ed) Physiological Processes Limiting Plant Productivity, pp 23–38. Butterworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss DN (1964) Optimum lighting of leaves. Crop Science 4: 131–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie GY and Baker NR (1990) Modifications to thylakoid composition during development of maize at low growth temperatures. Plant Physiol 95: 184–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Ögren E and Sjöstrom M (1990) Estimation of the effect of photoinhibition on the carbon gain in leaves of a willow canopy. Planta 181: 560–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Ort DR and Baker NR (1988) Consideration of photosynthetic efficiency at low light as a major determinant of crop photosynthetic performance. Plant Physiol Biochem 26: 555–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Oya VM and Laisk AK (1976) Adaptation of the photosynthesis apparatus to the light profile in the leaf. Soviet Plant Physiol 23: 381–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Powles SB (1984) Photoinhibition of photosynthesis induced by visible light. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 35: 15–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Rackhman O and Wilson J (1968) Use of an integrating sphere for spectral measurements of leaves. In: Wadsworth RM (ed) The Measurement of Environmental Factors in Terrestrial Ecology, pp 259–263. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling CM, Nie GY Aguilera C, Nugawela A, Long SP and Baker NR (1992) Photosynthetic productivity of an immature maize crop: Changes in quantum yield of CO2 assimilation, conversion efficiency and thylakoid proteins. Plant Cell Environ 14: 947–954

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling CM, Rodrigo VHL and Thorne PJ (1993). Effect of growth temperature on the photosynthetic performance of immature maize canopies. In: ‘Resource Capture by Crops’. Proceedings of the 52nd University of Nottingham Easter School (in press)

  • Terashima I and Saeki T (1985) A new model for leaf photosynthesis incorporating the gradients of light environment and of photosynthetic properties of chloroplasts within a leaf. Annals of Botany 56: 489–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiley GED and Warbots IB (1975) Crop establishment. In: Mildburn GM (ed) Grower's Handbook, 3rd edn, pp 18–25. Home-Grown Cereals Authority, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornley JHM and Johnson IR (1990) Plant and Crop Modelling: A Mathematical Approach to Plant and Crop Physiology. Oxford Science Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang YP, McMurtie RE and Landsberg JJ (1992) Modelling canopy photosynthetic productivity. In: Baker NR and Thomas H (eds) Crop Photosynthesis: Spatial and Temporal Determinants, pp 43–67. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stirling, C.M., Rodrigo, V.H. & Emberru, J. Chilling and photosynthetic productivity of field grown maize (Zea mays); changes in the parameters of the light-response curve, canopy leaf CO2 assimilation rate and crop radiation-use efficiency. Photosynth Res 38, 125–133 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146411

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146411

Key words

Navigation