Abstract
Richard Henson has argued that hedonistic-average-act-utilitarianism has the extremely counter-intuitive consequence that certain individuals ought to be killed simply because they are unhappy and because their deaths would raise the average level of happiness. It is argued that Henson's criticisms are correct and that they can be extended to other versions of utilitarianism: total (as opposed to average) utilitarianism, non-hedonistic versions of utilitarianism, and those versions of act-utilitarianism that have originated in the recent controversy about population control.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I am greatly indebted to Jan Narveson, Dan Brock, Mark Overvold and Joe Pitt for helpful criticisms of earlier versions of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carson, T.L. Utilitarianism and the wrongness of killing. Erkenntnis 20, 49–60 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166493
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166493