Skip to main content
Log in

Reduction: Some criteria and criticisms of the structuralist concept

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Adams, E.: 1959, ‘The Foundations of Rigid Body Mechanics and the Derivation of Its Laws from Those of Particle Mechanics’, in L. Henkin, P. Suppes and A. Tarski (eds.), The Axiomatic Method. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 250–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzer, W.: 1982, Empirische Theorien: Modelle-Strukturen-Beispiele, Vieweg, Braunschweig, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzer, W. and J. D. Sneed: 1977, 1978, ‘Generalized Net Structures of Empirical Theories I, II’, Studia Logica 36, 37, 195–211, 167–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberle, R. A.: 1971, ‘Replacing one Theory by Another under Preservation of a Given Feature’, Philosophy of Science 38, 486–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. K.: 1962, ‘Explanation, Reduction, and Empiricism’, in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. III, Scientific Explanation, Space and Time, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 28–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. K.: 1963, ‘How to Be a Good Empiricist — A Plea for Tolerance in Matters Epistemological’, in B. Baumrin (ed.), Philosophy of Science, The Delaware Seminar, Vol. 2 (1962–1963), Interscience Publishers, New York, London, Sidney, pp. 3–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P.: 1987, Rational Changes of Belief, Bradford Books, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glymour, C.: 1970, ‘On Some Patterns of Reduction’, Philosophy of Science 37, 340–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G.: 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, Free Press, New York, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoering, W.: 1984, ‘Anomalies of Reduction’, in W. Balzer, D. Pearce and H.-J. Schmidt (eds.), Reduction in Science, Reidel, Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster, pp. 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamlah, A.: 1985, ‘On Reduction of Theories’, Erkenntnis 22, 119–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemeny, J. G. and P. Oppenheim: 1956, ‘On Reduction’, Philosophical Studies 7, 6–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makinson, D.: 1985, ‘How to Give It Up: A Survey of Some Formal Aspects of the Logic of Theory Change’, Synthese 62, 347–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, D.: 1976, ‘Investigations of the Concept of Reduction I’, Erkenntnis 10, 275–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mormann, T.: 1984, ‘Strukturalistische Reduktionsbeziehungen als Morphismen von Constraintkategorien’, mimeo, Bielefeld.

  • Nagel, E.: 1949, ‘The Meaning of Reduction in Natural Sciences’, in R. C. Stauffer (ed.), Science and Civilization, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp. 99–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1980: ‘The Growth of Theories: Comments on the Structuralist Approach’, in J. Hintikka, D. Gruender and E. Agazzi (eds.), Theory Change, Ancient Axiomatics, and Galileo's Methodology, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 3–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D.: 1981, ‘Is There Any Justification for a Nonstatement View of Theories?’, Synthese 46, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D.: 1982, ‘Logical Properties of the Structuralist Concept of Reduction’, Erkenntnis 18, 307–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. and V. Rantala: 1983, ‘New Foundations for Metascience’, Synthese 56, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. and V. Rantala: 1984, ‘Limiting Case Correspondence between Physical Theories’, in W. Balzer, D. Pearce and H.-J. Schmidt (eds.), Reduction in Science, Reidel, Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster, pp. 153–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneed, J. D.: 1971, The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneed, J. D.: 1976, ‘Philosophical Problems in the Empirical Science of Science: A Formal Approach’, Erkenntnis 10, 115–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W.: 1973, Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophie. Band II, Theorie und Erfahrung, 2. Halbband, Theorienstrukturen und Theoriendynamik, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York. (English 1976, as The Structure and Dynamics of Theories, Springer, New York, Heidelberg, Berlin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W.: 1979, The Structuralist View of Theories, A Possible Analogue of the Bourbaki Programme in Physical Science, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomela, R.: 1978, ‘On the Structuralist Approach to the Dynamics of Theories’. Synthese 39, 211–231.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I wish to thank David Pearce for enlightening criticism and Winfred Klink for correcting my English.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rott, H. Reduction: Some criteria and criticisms of the structuralist concept. Erkenntnis 27, 231–256 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175370

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175370

Navigation