Skip to main content
Log in

Parallel versus sequential processing of relational stimulus structures

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organisms are often faced with sets of stimuli bearing specifiable relationships to each other. Experimental data suggest that even animals not suspected of being particularly rational can solve problems involving consistent linear relationships. We examine the information processing required to cope with these and related stimulus structures from a theoretical point of view. We show that both a parallel processing neural network model and a serially processing Turing machine model require minimal complexities to process linear hierarchical structures. When dealing with other relational stimulus structures, the models need differing, greater minimal complexities. Siemann and Delius (1994) report experimental results indicating that both pigeons and humans appear to operate according to the parallel, neural network model we propose here. Further experiments likely to be diagnostic are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Davis RL (1954) Structures of dominance relations. Bull Math Biophys 16:131–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayhoff J (1990) Neural network architectures. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fersen L von, Wynne C, Staddon JER, Delius JD (1990) Deductive reasoning in pigeons. Naturwissenschaften 77:548–549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fersen L von, Wynne C, Staddon JER, Delius JD (1991) Transitive inference formation in pigeons. J Exp Psychol [Anim Behav] 17:334–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber S (1979) Automaten. In: Grosche G, Ziegler V (eds) Taschenbuch der Mathematik Teubner, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Harary F (1969) Graph theory. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.; German translation (1974) Graphentheorie. Oldenbourg, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Henley N, Horsfall R, De Soto C (1969) Goodness of figure and social structure. Phychol Rev 76:194–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL (1986) Parallel distributed processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemann M, Delius JD (1994) Processing of hierarchical stimulus structures has advantages in humans and pigeons. Biol Cybern 71:531–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carmesin, H.O., Schwegler, H. Parallel versus sequential processing of relational stimulus structures. Biol. Cybern. 71, 523–529 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00198470

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00198470

Keywords

Navigation