Skip to main content
Log in

Segmental reflexes and ankle joint stiffness during co-contraction of antagonistic ankle muscles in man

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The size of soleus H-reflexes and short-latency stretch reflexes was measured at different levels of plantar flexion or co-contraction (simultaneous activation of dorsi- and plantar flexors) in seven healthy subjects. In four of seven subjects the short-latency stretc reflex was smaller during weak co-contraction than during isolated plantar flexion at matched background electromyogram (EMG) levels in the soleus muscle. In three of these four subjects the stretch reflex was larger during strong co-contraction than during plantar flexion, whereas it had the same size during the two tasks in the last subject. In the remaining subjects the stretch reflex either had the same size or was larger at all levels of co-contraction than at similar levels of plantar flexion. In contrast, the H-reflex was found to decrease with co-contraction at all contraction levels in all subjects. The decrease in the reflexes during weak co-contraction might be caused by presynaptic inhibition of Ia afferents. It is unclear why only the H-reflex decreased during strong co-contraction. The stiffness of the ankle joint was measured from the torque increment following the stretch of the plantar flexors divided by the stretch amplitude. In all subjects the total stiffness of the ankle joint was larger during strong co-contraction than during plantar flexion of similar strength. The stiffness was smaller during weak co-contraction than during weak plantar flexion in three out of seven subjects. The medial gastrocnemius muscle was more active at a given level of soleus activity during the co-contraction task than during the isolated plantar flexion task. It is suggested that the increase in the stiffness during co-contraction as compared to isolated plantar flexion was mainly due to the mechanical contribution of the activity in the tibialis anterior and medial gastrocnemius muscles. The decrease in stiffness during weak co-contraction was, in contrast, most likely mainly caused by modulation of reflex stiffness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akazawa K, Milner TE, Stein RB (1983) Modulation of reflex EMG and stiffness in response to stretch of human finger muscle. J Neurophysiol 49:16–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke D, Gandevia SC, McKeon B (1984) Monosynaptic and oligosynaptic contributions to human ankle jerk and H-reflex. J Neurophysiol 52:435–448

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carter RR, Crago PE, Gorman PH (1993) Nonlinear stretch reflex interaction during cocontraction. J Neurophysiol 69:943–952

    Google Scholar 

  • Crago PE, Houk JC, Hasan Z (1976) Regulatory actions of human stretch reflex. J Neurophysiol 39:925–935

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crone C, Hultborn H, Mazieres L, Morin C, Nielsen J, Pierrot-Deseilligny E (1990) Sensitivity of monosynaptic test reflexes to facilitation and inhibition as a function of the test reflex size: a study in man and the cat. Exp Brain Res 81:35–445

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Datta AK, Farmer SF, Stephens JA (1991) Central nervous pathways underlying synchronization of human motor unit firing studied during voluntary contractions. J Physiol (Lond) 432:401–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman AG (1980) Superposition of motor programs. I. Rythmic forearm movements in man. Neuroscience 5:81–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffer JA, Andreassen S (1981) Regulation of soleus muscle stiffness in premammilary cats: intrinsic stiffness and reflex components. J Neurophysiol 45:267–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulliger M, Dürmüller N, Prochazka A, Trend P (1989) Flexible fusimotor control of muscle spindle feedback during a variety of natural movements. Prog Brain Res 80:87–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey DR, Reed DJ (1983) Separate cortical systems for control of joint movement and joint stiffness: reciprocal activation and coactivation of antagonist muscles. In: Desmedt JE (ed) Motor control mechanisms in health and disease. Raven New York, pp 347–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn M, Yang JF, Prochazka A (1990) Human H-reflexes are smaller in difficult beam walking than in normal treadmill walking. Exp Brain Res 83:22–28

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols TR, Houk JC (1976) Improvements in linearity and regulation of stiffness that results from actions of stretch reflex. J Neurophysiol 39:119–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols TR (1989) The organization of heterogenic reflexes among muscles crossing the ankle joint in the decerebrate cat. J Physiol (Lond) 410:463–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen J, Kagamihara Y (1992) Regulation of reciprocal Ia inhibition during co-contraction of antagonistic muscles in man. J Physiol (Lond) 456:373–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen J, Kagamihara Y (1993) Regulation of presynaptic inhibition during co-contraction of antagonitsic muscles in man. J Physiol (Lond) 464:575–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierrot-Deseilligny E, Morin C, Bergego C, Tankov N (1981) Pattern of group I fibre projections from ankle flexor and extensor muscles in man. Exp Brain Res 42:337–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Schieppati M, Romano C, Gritti I (1990) Convergence of Ia fibres from synergistic and antagonistic muscles onto interneurones inhibitory to soleus in humans. J Physiol (Lond) 431:365–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinkjær T, Hoffer JA (1990) Factors determining segmental reflex action in normal and decerebrate cats. J Neurophysiol 64:1652–1635

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith AM (1981) The co-activation of antagonist muscles. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 59:733–747

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinkjær T, Toft E, Andreassen S, Hornemann BC (1988) Muscle stiffness in human ankle dorsiflexors: areflexive and reflex components. J Neurophysiol 60:1110–1121

    Google Scholar 

  • Toft E, Sinkjær T, Andreassen S, Larsen K (1991) Mechanical and electromyographic responses to stretch of the human ankle extensors. J Neurophysiol 65:1402–1410

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nielsen, J., Sinkjær, T., Toft, E. et al. Segmental reflexes and ankle joint stiffness during co-contraction of antagonistic ankle muscles in man. Exp Brain Res 102, 350–358 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227521

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227521

Key words

Navigation